Blockchaink2 Corp (BITK) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Blockchaink2 Corp (BITK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of December 2023. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$0.00) from net assets (CA$235.93K) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See working capital position of Blockchaink2 Corp to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Blockchaink2 Corp Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1999–2023)
This chart shows how Blockchaink2 Corp's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 24 annual periods from 1999 to 2023. As of December 2023, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of CA$235.93K with intangible assets of CA$0.00 CAD. See BITK days of operational coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Blockchaink2 Corp (1999–2023)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Blockchaink2 Corp from 1999 to 2023, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see BITK stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 100.0% | CA$297.78K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.16 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | CA$384.79K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.35 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | CA$1.51 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.87 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | CA$2.69 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.79 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | CA$2.90 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.95 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | CA$3.55 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$3.92 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | CA$949.37K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.06 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | CA$70.50K | CA$0.00 | CA$206.50K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$416.34K | CA$0.00 | CA$489.49K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$866.92K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.11 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$13.50 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$14.57 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$14.38 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$14.63 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$843.72K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$1.84 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.25 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$2.04 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.08 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$2.95 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.15 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$2.41 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.91 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | CA$1.68 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.88 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$3.27 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$3.33 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$2.59 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$3.98 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$2.90 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$3.01 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | CA$399.32K | CA$0.00 | CA$704.50K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | CA$19.13K | CA$0.00 | CA$492.79K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$3.07 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$3.09 Million | — |