District Copper Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
District Copper Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. District Copper Corp (DCOP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -2.51x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-293.64K could theoretically repay -3% of its total liabilities (CA$116.81K) in one year. Check District Copper Corp (DCOP) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of District Copper Corp (2004–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of District Copper Corp from 2004 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for District Copper Corp across 22 annual periods. Check DCOP cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
District Copper Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2004–2025)
District Copper Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2004 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for District Copper Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see District Copper Corp cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -5.23x | CA$-602.20K | CA$115.09K | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2024 | -8.30x | CA$-339.52K | CA$40.92K | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2023 | -7.61x | CA$-356.30K | CA$46.80K | ▲ +40.0% |
| 2022 | -12.68x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$88.04K | ▼ -213.3% |
| 2021 | -4.05x | CA$-527.95K | CA$130.40K | ▼ -1021.7% |
| 2020 | -0.36x | CA$-176.27K | CA$488.35K | ▲ +64.1% |
| 2019 | -1.00x | CA$-411.18K | CA$409.38K | ▲ +43.7% |
| 2018 | -1.78x | CA$-779.68K | CA$437.00K | ▼ -124.9% |
| 2017 | -0.79x | CA$-223.69K | CA$281.98K | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2016 | -1.15x | CA$-320.37K | CA$279.73K | ▼ -53.9% |
| 2015 | -0.74x | CA$-333.51K | CA$448.26K | ▲ +53.8% |
| 2014 | -1.61x | CA$-362.48K | CA$225.18K | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2013 | -4.90x | CA$-342.72K | CA$70.00K | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2012 | -5.46x | CA$-260.65K | CA$47.73K | ▼ -706.7% |
| 2011 | -0.68x | CA$-434.37K | CA$641.62K | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2010 | -4.75x | CA$-381.37K | CA$80.28K | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2009 | -6.77x | CA$-676.60K | CA$99.90K | ▼ -645.2% |
| 2008 | -0.91x | CA$-505.14K | CA$555.82K | ▲ +84.3% |
| 2007 | -5.77x | CA$-364.79K | CA$63.20K | ▲ +74.3% |
| 2006 | -22.43x | CA$-439.08K | CA$19.58K | ▼ -137.7% |
| 2005 | -9.44x | CA$-227.19K | CA$24.07K | ▲ +58.0% |
| 2004 | -22.45x | CA$-190.38K | CA$8.48K | — |