Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.58 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$42.90 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Playgon Games Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Playgon Games Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Playgon Games Inc across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Playgon Games Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Playgon Games Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Playgon Games Inc. Check how high is Playgon Games Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.13x | CA$-5.35 Million | CA$40.86 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2024 | -0.27x | CA$-9.07 Million | CA$33.65 Million | ▲ +50.4% |
| 2023 | -0.54x | CA$-11.36 Million | CA$20.87 Million | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2022 | -1.05x | CA$-11.19 Million | CA$10.63 Million | ▲ +69.1% |
| 2021 | -3.40x | CA$-11.21 Million | CA$3.29 Million | ▼ -312.3% |
| 2020 | -0.83x | CA$-3.82 Million | CA$4.62 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2019 | -1.20x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$1.44 Million | ▲ +78.9% |
| 2018 | -5.68x | CA$-4.05 Million | CA$713.01K | ▼ -122.2% |
| 2017 | -2.56x | CA$-1.72 Million | CA$670.91K | ▲ +28.3% |
| 2016 | -3.56x | CA$-863.31K | CA$242.20K | ▼ -83.8% |
| 2015 | -1.94x | CA$-75.30K | CA$38.84K | ▲ +65.8% |
| 2014 | -5.67x | CA$-105.05K | CA$18.51K | ▼ -453.7% |
| 2013 | -1.02x | CA$-53.09K | CA$51.80K | ▲ +85.8% |
| 2012 | -7.22x | CA$-83.25K | CA$11.53K | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2011 | -17.09x | CA$-120.13K | CA$7.03K | ▼ -1880.9% |
| 2010 | -0.86x | CA$-56.10K | CA$65.03K | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2009 | -0.99x | CA$-53.22K | CA$53.87K | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2008 | -1.39x | CA$-75.06K | CA$53.88K | ▲ +95.7% |
| 2007 | -32.29x | CA$-34.61K | CA$1.07K | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2006 | -48.65x | CA$-52.49K | CA$1.08K | ▼ -5413.0% |
| 2005 | -0.88x | CA$-71.53K | CA$81.06K | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2004 | -14.11x | CA$-87.00K | CA$6.17K | ▼ -298.1% |
| 2003 | -3.54x | CA$-100.04K | CA$28.23K | ▼ -395.6% |
| 2002 | -0.72x | CA$-40.68K | CA$56.89K | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2001 | -2.98x | CA$-201.72K | CA$67.71K | ▼ -627.1% |
| 2000 | -0.41x | CA$-58.57K | CA$142.96K | ▼ -3625.3% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | CA$-31.48K | CA$2.86 Million | ▲ +87.4% |
| 1998 | -0.09x | CA$-317.57K | CA$3.64 Million | — |