Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.58 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$42.90 Million) in one year. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Playgon Games Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Playgon Games Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Playgon Games Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore how large is Playgon Games Inc's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Playgon Games Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Playgon Games Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Playgon Games Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.13x | CA$-5.35 Million | CA$40.86 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2024 | -0.27x | CA$-9.07 Million | CA$33.65 Million | ▲ +50.4% |
| 2023 | -0.54x | CA$-11.36 Million | CA$20.87 Million | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2022 | -1.05x | CA$-11.19 Million | CA$10.63 Million | ▲ +69.1% |
| 2021 | -3.40x | CA$-11.21 Million | CA$3.29 Million | ▼ -312.3% |
| 2020 | -0.83x | CA$-3.82 Million | CA$4.62 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2019 | -1.20x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$1.44 Million | ▲ +78.9% |
| 2018 | -5.68x | CA$-4.05 Million | CA$713.01K | ▼ -122.2% |
| 2017 | -2.56x | CA$-1.72 Million | CA$670.91K | ▲ +28.3% |
| 2016 | -3.56x | CA$-863.31K | CA$242.20K | ▼ -83.8% |
| 2015 | -1.94x | CA$-75.30K | CA$38.84K | ▲ +65.8% |
| 2014 | -5.67x | CA$-105.05K | CA$18.51K | ▼ -453.7% |
| 2013 | -1.02x | CA$-53.09K | CA$51.80K | ▲ +85.8% |
| 2012 | -7.22x | CA$-83.25K | CA$11.53K | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2011 | -17.09x | CA$-120.13K | CA$7.03K | ▼ -1880.9% |
| 2010 | -0.86x | CA$-56.10K | CA$65.03K | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2009 | -0.99x | CA$-53.22K | CA$53.87K | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2008 | -1.39x | CA$-75.06K | CA$53.88K | ▲ +95.7% |
| 2007 | -32.29x | CA$-34.61K | CA$1.07K | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2006 | -48.65x | CA$-52.49K | CA$1.08K | ▼ -5413.0% |
| 2005 | -0.88x | CA$-71.53K | CA$81.06K | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2004 | -14.11x | CA$-87.00K | CA$6.17K | ▼ -298.1% |
| 2003 | -3.54x | CA$-100.04K | CA$28.23K | ▼ -395.6% |
| 2002 | -0.72x | CA$-40.68K | CA$56.89K | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2001 | -2.98x | CA$-201.72K | CA$67.71K | ▼ -627.1% |
| 2000 | -0.41x | CA$-58.57K | CA$142.96K | ▼ -3625.3% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | CA$-31.48K | CA$2.86 Million | ▲ +87.4% |
| 1998 | -0.09x | CA$-317.57K | CA$3.64 Million | — |