Playgon Games Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Playgon Games Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.58 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$42.90 Million) in one year. Check Playgon Games Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Playgon Games Inc (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Playgon Games Inc from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Playgon Games Inc across 28 annual periods. Check Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Playgon Games Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Playgon Games Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Playgon Games Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.13x | CA$-5.35 Million | CA$40.86 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2024 | -0.27x | CA$-9.07 Million | CA$33.65 Million | ▲ +50.4% |
| 2023 | -0.54x | CA$-11.36 Million | CA$20.87 Million | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2022 | -1.05x | CA$-11.19 Million | CA$10.63 Million | ▲ +69.1% |
| 2021 | -3.40x | CA$-11.21 Million | CA$3.29 Million | ▼ -312.3% |
| 2020 | -0.83x | CA$-3.82 Million | CA$4.62 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2019 | -1.20x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$1.44 Million | ▲ +78.9% |
| 2018 | -5.68x | CA$-4.05 Million | CA$713.01K | ▼ -122.2% |
| 2017 | -2.56x | CA$-1.72 Million | CA$670.91K | ▲ +28.3% |
| 2016 | -3.56x | CA$-863.31K | CA$242.20K | ▼ -83.8% |
| 2015 | -1.94x | CA$-75.30K | CA$38.84K | ▲ +65.8% |
| 2014 | -5.67x | CA$-105.05K | CA$18.51K | ▼ -453.7% |
| 2013 | -1.02x | CA$-53.09K | CA$51.80K | ▲ +85.8% |
| 2012 | -7.22x | CA$-83.25K | CA$11.53K | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2011 | -17.09x | CA$-120.13K | CA$7.03K | ▼ -1880.9% |
| 2010 | -0.86x | CA$-56.10K | CA$65.03K | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2009 | -0.99x | CA$-53.22K | CA$53.87K | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2008 | -1.39x | CA$-75.06K | CA$53.88K | ▲ +95.7% |
| 2007 | -32.29x | CA$-34.61K | CA$1.07K | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2006 | -48.65x | CA$-52.49K | CA$1.08K | ▼ -5413.0% |
| 2005 | -0.88x | CA$-71.53K | CA$81.06K | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2004 | -14.11x | CA$-87.00K | CA$6.17K | ▼ -298.1% |
| 2003 | -3.54x | CA$-100.04K | CA$28.23K | ▼ -395.6% |
| 2002 | -0.72x | CA$-40.68K | CA$56.89K | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2001 | -2.98x | CA$-201.72K | CA$67.71K | ▼ -627.1% |
| 2000 | -0.41x | CA$-58.57K | CA$142.96K | ▼ -3625.3% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | CA$-31.48K | CA$2.86 Million | ▲ +87.4% |
| 1998 | -0.09x | CA$-317.57K | CA$3.64 Million | — |