Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$38.85 Million) in one year. See Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Playgon Games Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Playgon Games Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore DEAL year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Playgon Games Inc (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Playgon Games Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.27x | CA$-9.07 Million | CA$33.65 Million | ▲ +50.4% |
| 2023 | -0.54x | CA$-11.36 Million | CA$20.87 Million | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2022 | -1.05x | CA$-11.19 Million | CA$10.63 Million | ▲ +69.1% |
| 2021 | -3.40x | CA$-11.21 Million | CA$3.29 Million | ▼ -312.3% |
| 2020 | -0.83x | CA$-3.82 Million | CA$4.62 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2019 | -1.20x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$1.44 Million | ▲ +78.9% |
| 2018 | -5.68x | CA$-4.05 Million | CA$713.01K | ▼ -122.2% |
| 2017 | -2.56x | CA$-1.72 Million | CA$670.91K | ▲ +28.3% |
| 2016 | -3.56x | CA$-863.31K | CA$242.20K | ▼ -83.8% |
| 2015 | -1.94x | CA$-75.30K | CA$38.84K | ▲ +65.8% |
| 2014 | -5.67x | CA$-105.05K | CA$18.51K | ▼ -453.7% |
| 2013 | -1.02x | CA$-53.09K | CA$51.80K | ▲ +85.8% |
| 2012 | -7.22x | CA$-83.25K | CA$11.53K | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2011 | -17.09x | CA$-120.13K | CA$7.03K | ▼ -1880.9% |
| 2010 | -0.86x | CA$-56.10K | CA$65.03K | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2009 | -0.99x | CA$-53.22K | CA$53.87K | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2008 | -1.39x | CA$-75.06K | CA$53.88K | ▲ +95.7% |
| 2007 | -32.29x | CA$-34.61K | CA$1.07K | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2006 | -48.65x | CA$-52.49K | CA$1.08K | ▼ -5413.0% |
| 2005 | -0.88x | CA$-71.53K | CA$81.06K | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2004 | -14.11x | CA$-87.00K | CA$6.17K | ▼ -298.1% |
| 2003 | -3.54x | CA$-100.04K | CA$28.23K | ▼ -395.6% |
| 2002 | -0.72x | CA$-40.68K | CA$56.89K | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2001 | -2.98x | CA$-201.72K | CA$67.71K | ▼ -627.1% |
| 2000 | -0.41x | CA$-58.57K | CA$142.96K | ▼ -3625.3% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | CA$-31.48K | CA$2.86 Million | ▲ +87.4% |
| 1998 | -0.09x | CA$-317.57K | CA$3.64 Million | — |