Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -261.4% as of September 2022. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$6.66 Million) from net assets (CA$1.84 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See how liquid is Playgon Games Inc's working capital to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Playgon Games Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1998–2021)
This chart shows how Playgon Games Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 21 annual periods from 1998 to 2021. As of September 2022, the ratio stands at -261.4%, reflecting net assets of CA$1.84 Million with intangible assets of CA$6.66 Million CAD. See DEAL cash and liquid assets coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Playgon Games Inc (1998–2021)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Playgon Games Inc from 1998 to 2021, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see DEAL stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 38.4% | CA$13.79 Million | CA$8.50 Million | CA$17.08 Million | ▲ +59.3 pp |
| 2020 | -20.9% | CA$9.06 Million | CA$10.95 Million | CA$13.68 Million | ▼ -54.0 pp |
| 2017 | 33.1% | CA$5.31 Million | CA$3.55 Million | CA$5.98 Million | ▼ -47.9 pp |
| 2016 | 81.1% | CA$7.10 Million | CA$1.34 Million | CA$7.35 Million | ▼ -18.9 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$134.57K | CA$0.00 | CA$173.41K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$250.25K | CA$0.00 | CA$268.76K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$223.68K | CA$0.00 | CA$275.49K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$384.51K | CA$0.00 | CA$396.04K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$491.01K | CA$0.00 | CA$498.04K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$549.68K | CA$0.00 | CA$614.71K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$316.79K | CA$0.00 | CA$370.65K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$372.07K | CA$0.00 | CA$425.94K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$138.20K | CA$0.00 | CA$139.27K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | CA$172.94K | CA$0.00 | CA$174.02K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$379.01K | CA$0.00 | CA$460.07K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$78.29K | CA$0.00 | CA$84.46K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$144.40K | CA$0.00 | CA$172.63K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | CA$26.21K | CA$0.00 | CA$93.92K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | CA$151.49K | CA$0.00 | CA$294.45K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$98.27K | CA$0.00 | CA$2.96 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | CA$279.40K | CA$0.00 | CA$3.92 Million | — |