Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Playgon Games Inc (DEAL) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -261.4% as of September 2022. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$6.66 Million) from net assets (CA$1.84 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Playgon Games Inc net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Playgon Games Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1998–2021)
This chart shows how Playgon Games Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 21 annual periods from 1998 to 2021. As of September 2022, the ratio stands at -261.4%, reflecting net assets of CA$1.84 Million with intangible assets of CA$6.66 Million CAD. Also explore Playgon Games Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Playgon Games Inc (1998–2021)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Playgon Games Inc from 1998 to 2021, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see DEAL company net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 38.4% | CA$13.79 Million | CA$8.50 Million | CA$17.08 Million | ▲ +59.3 pp |
| 2020 | -20.9% | CA$9.06 Million | CA$10.95 Million | CA$13.68 Million | ▼ -54.0 pp |
| 2017 | 33.1% | CA$5.31 Million | CA$3.55 Million | CA$5.98 Million | ▼ -47.9 pp |
| 2016 | 81.1% | CA$7.10 Million | CA$1.34 Million | CA$7.35 Million | ▼ -18.9 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$134.57K | CA$0.00 | CA$173.41K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$250.25K | CA$0.00 | CA$268.76K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$223.68K | CA$0.00 | CA$275.49K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$384.51K | CA$0.00 | CA$396.04K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$491.01K | CA$0.00 | CA$498.04K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$549.68K | CA$0.00 | CA$614.71K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$316.79K | CA$0.00 | CA$370.65K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$372.07K | CA$0.00 | CA$425.94K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$138.20K | CA$0.00 | CA$139.27K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | CA$172.94K | CA$0.00 | CA$174.02K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$379.01K | CA$0.00 | CA$460.07K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$78.29K | CA$0.00 | CA$84.46K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$144.40K | CA$0.00 | CA$172.63K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | CA$26.21K | CA$0.00 | CA$93.92K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | CA$151.49K | CA$0.00 | CA$294.45K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$98.27K | CA$0.00 | CA$2.96 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | CA$279.40K | CA$0.00 | CA$3.92 Million | — |