Eskay Mining Corp (ESK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eskay Mining Corp (ESK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.50x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-454.24K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$907.11K) in one year. See how much free cash does Eskay Mining Corp generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Eskay Mining Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Eskay Mining Corp across 28 annual periods. Also explore ESK year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Eskay Mining Corp (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eskay Mining Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Eskay Mining Corp (ESK) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.31x | CA$-900.00K | CA$686.73K | ▼ -363.8% |
| 2024 | -0.28x | CA$-107.11K | CA$379.08K | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2023 | -4.64x | CA$-14.77 Million | CA$3.18 Million | ▲ +10.1% |
| 2022 | -5.16x | CA$-15.44 Million | CA$2.99 Million | ▼ -316.7% |
| 2021 | -1.24x | CA$-6.17 Million | CA$4.98 Million | ▼ -174.3% |
| 2020 | -0.45x | CA$-418.39K | CA$926.21K | ▲ +53.8% |
| 2019 | -0.98x | CA$-637.97K | CA$652.05K | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2018 | -1.29x | CA$-768.81K | CA$594.61K | ▼ -340.3% |
| 2017 | -0.29x | CA$-261.22K | CA$889.55K | ▼ -292.5% |
| 2016 | -0.07x | CA$-101.10K | CA$1.35 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2015 | -0.14x | CA$-162.84K | CA$1.16 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2014 | -0.18x | CA$-182.36K | CA$988.67K | ▼ -110.8% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | CA$-71.99K | CA$822.72K | ▲ +91.8% |
| 2012 | -1.07x | CA$-673.60K | CA$630.40K | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2011 | -2.97x | CA$-741.92K | CA$250.06K | ▼ -567.8% |
| 2010 | -0.44x | CA$-335.86K | CA$756.01K | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2009 | -0.72x | CA$-1.75 Million | CA$2.42 Million | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2008 | -0.74x | CA$-2.07 Million | CA$2.78 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2007 | -0.67x | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$2.71 Million | ▲ +74.9% |
| 2006 | -2.67x | CA$-841.27K | CA$314.95K | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2005 | -8.71x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$118.45K | ▼ -327.3% |
| 2004 | -2.04x | CA$-400.46K | CA$196.44K | ▼ -569.4% |
| 2003 | 0.43x | CA$100.66K | CA$231.78K | ▲ +152.6% |
| 2002 | -0.83x | CA$-178.14K | CA$215.82K | ▼ -245.4% |
| 2001 | -0.24x | CA$-76.43K | CA$319.79K | ▲ +40.0% |
| 2000 | -0.40x | CA$-89.42K | CA$224.65K | ▲ +86.8% |
| 1999 | -3.02x | CA$-611.33K | CA$202.14K | ▲ +15.8% |
| 1998 | -3.59x | CA$-553.11K | CA$153.99K | — |