Eskay Mining Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eskay Mining Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Eskay Mining Corp (ESK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.50x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-454.24K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$907.11K) in one year. Check Eskay Mining Corp (ESK) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Eskay Mining Corp (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Eskay Mining Corp from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Eskay Mining Corp across 28 annual periods. Check Eskay Mining Corp investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Eskay Mining Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Eskay Mining Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eskay Mining Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ESK cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.31x | CA$-900.00K | CA$686.73K | ▼ -363.8% |
| 2024 | -0.28x | CA$-107.11K | CA$379.08K | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2023 | -4.64x | CA$-14.77 Million | CA$3.18 Million | ▲ +10.1% |
| 2022 | -5.16x | CA$-15.44 Million | CA$2.99 Million | ▼ -316.7% |
| 2021 | -1.24x | CA$-6.17 Million | CA$4.98 Million | ▼ -174.3% |
| 2020 | -0.45x | CA$-418.39K | CA$926.21K | ▲ +53.8% |
| 2019 | -0.98x | CA$-637.97K | CA$652.05K | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2018 | -1.29x | CA$-768.81K | CA$594.61K | ▼ -340.3% |
| 2017 | -0.29x | CA$-261.22K | CA$889.55K | ▼ -292.5% |
| 2016 | -0.07x | CA$-101.10K | CA$1.35 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2015 | -0.14x | CA$-162.84K | CA$1.16 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2014 | -0.18x | CA$-182.36K | CA$988.67K | ▼ -110.8% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | CA$-71.99K | CA$822.72K | ▲ +91.8% |
| 2012 | -1.07x | CA$-673.60K | CA$630.40K | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2011 | -2.97x | CA$-741.92K | CA$250.06K | ▼ -567.8% |
| 2010 | -0.44x | CA$-335.86K | CA$756.01K | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2009 | -0.72x | CA$-1.75 Million | CA$2.42 Million | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2008 | -0.74x | CA$-2.07 Million | CA$2.78 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2007 | -0.67x | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$2.71 Million | ▲ +74.9% |
| 2006 | -2.67x | CA$-841.27K | CA$314.95K | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2005 | -8.71x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$118.45K | ▼ -327.3% |
| 2004 | -2.04x | CA$-400.46K | CA$196.44K | ▼ -569.4% |
| 2003 | 0.43x | CA$100.66K | CA$231.78K | ▲ +152.6% |
| 2002 | -0.83x | CA$-178.14K | CA$215.82K | ▼ -245.4% |
| 2001 | -0.24x | CA$-76.43K | CA$319.79K | ▲ +40.0% |
| 2000 | -0.40x | CA$-89.42K | CA$224.65K | ▲ +86.8% |
| 1999 | -3.02x | CA$-611.33K | CA$202.14K | ▲ +15.8% |
| 1998 | -3.59x | CA$-553.11K | CA$153.99K | — |