Eskay Mining Corp (ESK) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Eskay Mining Corp (ESK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of November 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$0.00) from net assets (CA$5.20 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Eskay Mining Corp current assets vs equity to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Eskay Mining Corp Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1998–2025)
This chart shows how Eskay Mining Corp's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 19 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of November 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of CA$5.20 Million with intangible assets of CA$0.00 CAD. See ESK defensive asset coverage days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Eskay Mining Corp (1998–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Eskay Mining Corp from 1998 to 2025, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see ESK stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | CA$3.98 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.67 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 100.0% | CA$5.67 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$6.05 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | CA$6.33 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$9.51 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | CA$5.49 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$8.48 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | CA$10.63 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$15.62 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$23.72 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$23.97 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$21.38 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$22.14 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$34.73 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$37.16 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$35.95 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$38.74 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$32.80 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$35.51 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | CA$17.26 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$17.57 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$4.40 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.52 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$510.52K | CA$0.00 | CA$706.96K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$65.27K | CA$0.00 | CA$297.05K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | CA$6.69 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$6.90 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | CA$8.22 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$8.54 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | CA$9.37 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$9.59 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$9.52 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$9.72 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | CA$9.39 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$9.54 Million | — |