Eskay Mining Corp (ESK) — Net Asset Quality Index
Eskay Mining Corp (ESK) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 85.1% as of November 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$6.10 Million minus total liabilities of CA$907.11K yields net assets of CA$5.20 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read Eskay Mining Corp debt and liabilities for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Eskay Mining Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1998–2025)
This chart shows how Eskay Mining Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of November 2025, the index stands at 85.1%, representing net assets of CA$5.20 Million against total assets of CA$6.10 Million CAD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Eskay Mining Corp.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Eskay Mining Corp (1998–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Eskay Mining Corp from 1998 to 2025, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check ESK strategic assets to equity ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 85.3% | CA$3.98 Million | CA$4.67 Million | CA$686.73K | ▼ -8.5 pp |
| 2024 | 93.7% | CA$5.67 Million | CA$6.05 Million | CA$379.08K | ▲ +27.2 pp |
| 2023 | 66.6% | CA$6.33 Million | CA$9.51 Million | CA$3.18 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2022 | 64.7% | CA$5.49 Million | CA$8.48 Million | CA$2.99 Million | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2021 | 68.1% | CA$10.63 Million | CA$15.62 Million | CA$4.98 Million | ▲ +300.6 pp |
| 2020 | -232.5% | CA$-647.65K | CA$278.57K | CA$926.21K | ▲ +76.0 pp |
| 2019 | -308.5% | CA$-492.43K | CA$159.62K | CA$652.05K | ▼ -222.7 pp |
| 2018 | -85.8% | CA$-274.55K | CA$320.06K | CA$594.61K | ▲ +133.8 pp |
| 2017 | -219.6% | CA$-611.20K | CA$278.35K | CA$889.55K | ▲ +470.5 pp |
| 2016 | -690.1% | CA$-1.18 Million | CA$171.03K | CA$1.35 Million | ▼ -181.5 pp |
| 2015 | -508.6% | CA$-970.06K | CA$190.72K | CA$1.16 Million | ▼ -81.2 pp |
| 2014 | -427.4% | CA$-801.22K | CA$187.46K | CA$988.67K | ▼ -109.1 pp |
| 2013 | -318.3% | CA$-626.05K | CA$196.67K | CA$822.72K | ▼ -148.6 pp |
| 2012 | -169.7% | CA$-396.70K | CA$233.70K | CA$630.40K | ▼ -268.7 pp |
| 2011 | 99.0% | CA$23.72 Million | CA$23.97 Million | CA$250.06K | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2010 | 96.6% | CA$21.38 Million | CA$22.14 Million | CA$756.01K | ▲ +3.1 pp |
| 2009 | 93.5% | CA$34.73 Million | CA$37.16 Million | CA$2.42 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2008 | 92.8% | CA$35.95 Million | CA$38.74 Million | CA$2.78 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2007 | 92.4% | CA$32.80 Million | CA$35.51 Million | CA$2.71 Million | ▼ -5.8 pp |
| 2006 | 98.2% | CA$17.26 Million | CA$17.57 Million | CA$314.95K | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2005 | 97.4% | CA$4.40 Million | CA$4.52 Million | CA$118.45K | ▲ +25.2 pp |
| 2004 | 72.2% | CA$510.52K | CA$706.96K | CA$196.44K | ▲ +50.2 pp |
| 2003 | 22.0% | CA$65.27K | CA$297.05K | CA$231.78K | ▼ -74.9 pp |
| 2002 | 96.9% | CA$6.69 Million | CA$6.90 Million | CA$215.82K | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2001 | 96.3% | CA$8.22 Million | CA$8.54 Million | CA$319.79K | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2000 | 97.7% | CA$9.37 Million | CA$9.59 Million | CA$224.65K | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 1999 | 97.9% | CA$9.52 Million | CA$9.72 Million | CA$202.14K | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 1998 | 98.4% | CA$9.39 Million | CA$9.54 Million | CA$153.99K | — |