ReGen III Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ReGen III Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. ReGen III Corp (GIII) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.20x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$5.10 Million) in one year. Check ReGen III Corp earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of ReGen III Corp (2001–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of ReGen III Corp from 2001 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for ReGen III Corp across 22 annual periods. Check how aggressively does ReGen III Corp reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
ReGen III Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2024)
ReGen III Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ReGen III Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GIII cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.74x | CA$-3.69 Million | CA$5.02 Million | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2023 | -0.92x | CA$-4.25 Million | CA$4.61 Million | ▲ +78.8% |
| 2022 | -4.35x | CA$-9.58 Million | CA$2.20 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2021 | -5.63x | CA$-6.80 Million | CA$1.21 Million | ▼ -5183.1% |
| 2020 | -0.11x | CA$-1.65 Million | CA$15.47 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2019 | -0.27x | CA$-3.47 Million | CA$13.08 Million | ▲ +91.9% |
| 2018 | -3.28x | CA$-6.42 Million | CA$1.96 Million | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2017 | -3.89x | CA$-4.13 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▼ -466.4% |
| 2016 | -0.69x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$1.63 Million | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2015 | -1.70x | CA$-1.83 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2014 | -2.05x | CA$-2.07 Million | CA$1.01 Million | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2013 | -2.76x | CA$-2.51 Million | CA$906.92K | ▼ -59.4% |
| 2012 | -1.73x | CA$-3.00 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2011 | -4.16x | CA$-2.70 Million | CA$649.56K | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2010 | -5.00x | CA$-98.23K | CA$19.66K | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2009 | -7.27x | CA$-111.00K | CA$15.26K | ▼ -493.8% |
| 2008 | -1.22x | CA$-62.49K | CA$51.03K | ▼ -468.4% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | CA$-56.16K | CA$260.67K | ▲ +22.2% |
| 2006 | -0.28x | CA$-57.44K | CA$207.42K | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2005 | -0.25x | CA$-42.80K | CA$172.43K | ▼ -127.5% |
| 2002 | -0.11x | CA$-18.98K | CA$173.99K | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2001 | -0.28x | CA$-26.93K | CA$96.30K | — |