ReGen III Corp (GIII) — Net Asset Quality Index
ReGen III Corp (GIII) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -884.5% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$518.30K minus total liabilities of CA$5.10 Million yields net assets of CA$-4.58 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check GIII asset liquidity ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
ReGen III Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2024)
This chart shows how ReGen III Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 22 annual periods from 2001 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at -884.5%, representing net assets of CA$-4.58 Million against total assets of CA$518.30K CAD. See ReGen III Corp (GIII) working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for ReGen III Corp (2001–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for ReGen III Corp from 2001 to 2024, covering 22 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see GIII market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -673.9% | CA$-4.37 Million | CA$649.05K | CA$5.02 Million | ▼ -602.0 pp |
| 2023 | -71.9% | CA$-1.93 Million | CA$2.68 Million | CA$4.61 Million | ▲ +6.9 pp |
| 2022 | -78.8% | CA$-971.08K | CA$1.23 Million | CA$2.20 Million | ▼ -164.6 pp |
| 2021 | 85.8% | CA$7.30 Million | CA$8.51 Million | CA$1.21 Million | ▲ +122.7 pp |
| 2020 | -36.9% | CA$-4.17 Million | CA$11.30 Million | CA$15.47 Million | ▼ -17.6 pp |
| 2019 | -19.3% | CA$-2.11 Million | CA$10.97 Million | CA$13.08 Million | ▼ -40.0 pp |
| 2018 | 20.7% | CA$510.57K | CA$2.47 Million | CA$1.96 Million | ▼ -63.3 pp |
| 2017 | 84.0% | CA$5.57 Million | CA$6.63 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▲ +261.8 pp |
| 2016 | -177.8% | CA$-1.05 Million | CA$587.68K | CA$1.63 Million | ▼ -213.9 pp |
| 2015 | 36.0% | CA$607.64K | CA$1.69 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -43.7 pp |
| 2014 | 79.7% | CA$3.97 Million | CA$4.97 Million | CA$1.01 Million | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2013 | 87.7% | CA$6.47 Million | CA$7.38 Million | CA$906.92K | ▼ -8.6 pp |
| 2012 | 96.3% | CA$45.43 Million | CA$47.17 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2011 | 98.7% | CA$50.64 Million | CA$51.29 Million | CA$649.56K | ▲ +6.1 pp |
| 2010 | 92.6% | CA$245.64K | CA$265.30K | CA$19.66K | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2009 | 95.7% | CA$340.09K | CA$355.36K | CA$15.26K | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2008 | 89.1% | CA$415.33K | CA$466.36K | CA$51.03K | ▲ +677.8 pp |
| 2007 | -588.7% | CA$-222.82K | CA$37.85K | CA$260.67K | ▼ -455.5 pp |
| 2006 | -133.3% | CA$-118.50K | CA$88.92K | CA$207.42K | ▼ -101.1 pp |
| 2005 | -32.2% | CA$-42.01K | CA$130.42K | CA$172.43K | ▼ -122.2 pp |
| 2002 | 90.0% | CA$1.56 Million | CA$1.74 Million | CA$173.99K | ▼ -6.4 pp |
| 2001 | 96.4% | CA$2.59 Million | CA$2.68 Million | CA$96.30K | — |