Grande Portage Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Grande Portage Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Grande Portage Resources Ltd (GPG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.55x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-617.64K could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$398.30K) in one year. Check Grande Portage Resources Ltd (GPG) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Grande Portage Resources Ltd (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Grande Portage Resources Ltd from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Grande Portage Resources Ltd across 27 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Grande Portage Resources Ltd reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Grande Portage Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Grande Portage Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Grande Portage Resources Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Grande Portage Resources Ltd cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -3.17x | CA$-850.15K | CA$268.57K | ▲ +37.9% |
| 2024 | -5.10x | CA$-1.46 Million | CA$287.27K | ▼ -7485.9% |
| 2023 | -0.07x | CA$-74.37K | CA$1.11 Million | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2022 | -2.77x | CA$-765.82K | CA$276.13K | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2021 | -1.93x | CA$-838.10K | CA$433.78K | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2020 | -1.24x | CA$-558.09K | CA$450.33K | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2019 | -2.30x | CA$-529.53K | CA$230.60K | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2018 | -3.69x | CA$-1.29 Million | CA$348.53K | ▼ -465.7% |
| 2017 | -0.65x | CA$-332.74K | CA$510.06K | ▼ -62.7% |
| 2016 | -0.40x | CA$-163.33K | CA$407.43K | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2015 | -0.33x | CA$-90.14K | CA$273.72K | ▲ +84.5% |
| 2014 | -2.12x | CA$-232.65K | CA$109.49K | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2013 | -2.19x | CA$-197.39K | CA$89.99K | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2012 | -1.65x | CA$-481.52K | CA$291.50K | ▲ +53.4% |
| 2011 | -3.54x | CA$-291.09K | CA$82.15K | ▼ -739.2% |
| 2010 | -0.42x | CA$-256.06K | CA$606.42K | ▼ -160.5% |
| 2009 | 0.70x | CA$31.92K | CA$45.74K | ▲ +104.5% |
| 2008 | -15.68x | CA$-784.30K | CA$50.02K | ▼ -390.7% |
| 2007 | -3.20x | CA$-620.08K | CA$194.06K | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2006 | -5.19x | CA$-258.01K | CA$49.75K | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2005 | -2.74x | CA$-165.56K | CA$60.52K | ▼ -513.4% |
| 2004 | -0.45x | CA$-177.96K | CA$399.00K | ▼ -492.9% |
| 2003 | -0.08x | CA$-34.81K | CA$462.73K | ▼ -131.8% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | CA$80.28K | CA$339.03K | ▲ +262.6% |
| 2001 | -0.15x | CA$-31.00K | CA$212.83K | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2000 | -0.12x | CA$-18.89K | CA$162.29K | ▲ +97.0% |
| 1999 | -3.92x | CA$-420.37K | CA$107.33K | — |