Grande Portage Resources Ltd (GPG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Grande Portage Resources Ltd (GPG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.61x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-143.36K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$234.43K) in one year. See Grande Portage Resources Ltd free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Grande Portage Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Grande Portage Resources Ltd across 27 annual periods. Also explore Grande Portage Resources Ltd (GPG) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Grande Portage Resources Ltd (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Grande Portage Resources Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GPG stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -3.17x | CA$-850.15K | CA$268.57K | ▲ +37.9% |
| 2024 | -5.10x | CA$-1.46 Million | CA$287.27K | ▼ -7485.9% |
| 2023 | -0.07x | CA$-74.37K | CA$1.11 Million | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2022 | -2.77x | CA$-765.82K | CA$276.13K | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2021 | -1.93x | CA$-838.10K | CA$433.78K | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2020 | -1.24x | CA$-558.09K | CA$450.33K | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2019 | -2.30x | CA$-529.53K | CA$230.60K | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2018 | -3.69x | CA$-1.29 Million | CA$348.53K | ▼ -465.7% |
| 2017 | -0.65x | CA$-332.74K | CA$510.06K | ▼ -62.7% |
| 2016 | -0.40x | CA$-163.33K | CA$407.43K | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2015 | -0.33x | CA$-90.14K | CA$273.72K | ▲ +84.5% |
| 2014 | -2.12x | CA$-232.65K | CA$109.49K | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2013 | -2.19x | CA$-197.39K | CA$89.99K | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2012 | -1.65x | CA$-481.52K | CA$291.50K | ▲ +53.4% |
| 2011 | -3.54x | CA$-291.09K | CA$82.15K | ▼ -739.2% |
| 2010 | -0.42x | CA$-256.06K | CA$606.42K | ▼ -160.5% |
| 2009 | 0.70x | CA$31.92K | CA$45.74K | ▲ +104.5% |
| 2008 | -15.68x | CA$-784.30K | CA$50.02K | ▼ -390.7% |
| 2007 | -3.20x | CA$-620.08K | CA$194.06K | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2006 | -5.19x | CA$-258.01K | CA$49.75K | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2005 | -2.74x | CA$-165.56K | CA$60.52K | ▼ -513.4% |
| 2004 | -0.45x | CA$-177.96K | CA$399.00K | ▼ -492.9% |
| 2003 | -0.08x | CA$-34.81K | CA$462.73K | ▼ -131.8% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | CA$80.28K | CA$339.03K | ▲ +262.6% |
| 2001 | -0.15x | CA$-31.00K | CA$212.83K | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2000 | -0.12x | CA$-18.89K | CA$162.29K | ▲ +97.0% |
| 1999 | -3.92x | CA$-420.37K | CA$107.33K | — |