Legend Power Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Legend Power Systems Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Legend Power Systems Inc (LPS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.68x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.04 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.53 Million) in one year. Check LPS cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Legend Power Systems Inc (2002–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Legend Power Systems Inc from 2002 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Legend Power Systems Inc across 24 annual periods. Check LPS total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Legend Power Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2025)
Legend Power Systems Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Legend Power Systems Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Legend Power Systems Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.86x | CA$-1.87 Million | CA$2.17 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2024 | -1.14x | CA$-2.09 Million | CA$1.84 Million | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2023 | -2.34x | CA$-2.89 Million | CA$1.23 Million | ▲ +63.2% |
| 2022 | -6.37x | CA$-6.07 Million | CA$953.16K | ▼ -324.6% |
| 2021 | -1.50x | CA$-2.57 Million | CA$1.71 Million | ▲ +37.0% |
| 2020 | -2.38x | CA$-3.35 Million | CA$1.41 Million | ▲ +42.3% |
| 2019 | -4.13x | CA$-3.87 Million | CA$937.66K | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2018 | -2.96x | CA$-2.64 Million | CA$890.80K | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2017 | -3.88x | CA$-3.85 Million | CA$992.93K | ▼ -95.5% |
| 2016 | -1.98x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$815.45K | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2015 | -4.86x | CA$-2.63 Million | CA$540.90K | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2014 | -3.75x | CA$-1.84 Million | CA$490.13K | ▼ -260.9% |
| 2013 | -1.04x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$1.25 Million | ▲ +72.7% |
| 2012 | -3.81x | CA$-1.76 Million | CA$462.52K | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2011 | -5.09x | CA$-2.22 Million | CA$436.33K | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2010 | -3.52x | CA$-3.17 Million | CA$899.97K | ▼ -134.2% |
| 2009 | -1.50x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$1.15 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2008 | -1.41x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$1.15 Million | ▼ -29420.8% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | CA$2.27K | CA$471.23K | ▲ +104.6% |
| 2006 | -0.11x | CA$-44.33K | CA$419.82K | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | CA$-34.14K | CA$374.27K | ▲ +75.9% |
| 2004 | -0.38x | CA$-146.51K | CA$386.61K | ▼ -177.0% |
| 2003 | -0.14x | CA$-15.55K | CA$113.69K | ▼ -251.7% |
| 2002 | -0.04x | CA$-41.94K | CA$1.08 Million | — |