Legend Power Systems Inc (LPS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Legend Power Systems Inc (LPS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$43.69K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.41 Million) in one year. Check LPS cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Legend Power Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Legend Power Systems Inc across 24 annual periods. Also explore Legend Power Systems Inc assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Legend Power Systems Inc (2002–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Legend Power Systems Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Legend Power Systems Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.86x | CA$-1.87 Million | CA$2.17 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2024 | -1.14x | CA$-2.09 Million | CA$1.84 Million | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2023 | -2.34x | CA$-2.89 Million | CA$1.23 Million | ▲ +63.2% |
| 2022 | -6.37x | CA$-6.07 Million | CA$953.16K | ▼ -324.6% |
| 2021 | -1.50x | CA$-2.57 Million | CA$1.71 Million | ▲ +37.0% |
| 2020 | -2.38x | CA$-3.35 Million | CA$1.41 Million | ▲ +42.3% |
| 2019 | -4.13x | CA$-3.87 Million | CA$937.66K | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2018 | -2.96x | CA$-2.64 Million | CA$890.80K | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2017 | -3.88x | CA$-3.85 Million | CA$992.93K | ▼ -95.5% |
| 2016 | -1.98x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$815.45K | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2015 | -4.86x | CA$-2.63 Million | CA$540.90K | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2014 | -3.75x | CA$-1.84 Million | CA$490.13K | ▼ -260.9% |
| 2013 | -1.04x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$1.25 Million | ▲ +72.7% |
| 2012 | -3.81x | CA$-1.76 Million | CA$462.52K | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2011 | -5.09x | CA$-2.22 Million | CA$436.33K | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2010 | -3.52x | CA$-3.17 Million | CA$899.97K | ▼ -134.2% |
| 2009 | -1.50x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$1.15 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2008 | -1.41x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$1.15 Million | ▼ -29420.8% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | CA$2.27K | CA$471.23K | ▲ +104.6% |
| 2006 | -0.11x | CA$-44.33K | CA$419.82K | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | CA$-34.14K | CA$374.27K | ▲ +75.9% |
| 2004 | -0.38x | CA$-146.51K | CA$386.61K | ▼ -177.0% |
| 2003 | -0.14x | CA$-15.55K | CA$113.69K | ▼ -251.7% |
| 2002 | -0.04x | CA$-41.94K | CA$1.08 Million | — |