Legend Power Systems Inc (LPS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Legend Power Systems Inc (LPS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$43.69K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.41 Million) in one year. See LPS free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Legend Power Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Legend Power Systems Inc across 24 annual periods. Also explore LPS shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Legend Power Systems Inc (2002–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Legend Power Systems Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LPS company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.86x | CA$-1.87 Million | CA$2.17 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2024 | -1.14x | CA$-2.09 Million | CA$1.84 Million | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2023 | -2.34x | CA$-2.89 Million | CA$1.23 Million | ▲ +63.2% |
| 2022 | -6.37x | CA$-6.07 Million | CA$953.16K | ▼ -324.6% |
| 2021 | -1.50x | CA$-2.57 Million | CA$1.71 Million | ▲ +37.0% |
| 2020 | -2.38x | CA$-3.35 Million | CA$1.41 Million | ▲ +42.3% |
| 2019 | -4.13x | CA$-3.87 Million | CA$937.66K | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2018 | -2.96x | CA$-2.64 Million | CA$890.80K | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2017 | -3.88x | CA$-3.85 Million | CA$992.93K | ▼ -95.5% |
| 2016 | -1.98x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$815.45K | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2015 | -4.86x | CA$-2.63 Million | CA$540.90K | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2014 | -3.75x | CA$-1.84 Million | CA$490.13K | ▼ -260.9% |
| 2013 | -1.04x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$1.25 Million | ▲ +72.7% |
| 2012 | -3.81x | CA$-1.76 Million | CA$462.52K | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2011 | -5.09x | CA$-2.22 Million | CA$436.33K | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2010 | -3.52x | CA$-3.17 Million | CA$899.97K | ▼ -134.2% |
| 2009 | -1.50x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$1.15 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2008 | -1.41x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$1.15 Million | ▼ -29420.8% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | CA$2.27K | CA$471.23K | ▲ +104.6% |
| 2006 | -0.11x | CA$-44.33K | CA$419.82K | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | CA$-34.14K | CA$374.27K | ▲ +75.9% |
| 2004 | -0.38x | CA$-146.51K | CA$386.61K | ▼ -177.0% |
| 2003 | -0.14x | CA$-15.55K | CA$113.69K | ▼ -251.7% |
| 2002 | -0.04x | CA$-41.94K | CA$1.08 Million | — |