Melkior Resources Inc. (MKR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Melkior Resources Inc. (MKR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.28x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-74.32K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$265.88K) in one year. See Melkior Resources Inc. free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Melkior Resources Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Melkior Resources Inc. across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Melkior Resources Inc. cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Melkior Resources Inc. (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Melkior Resources Inc.. Check Melkior Resources Inc. earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -6.60x | CA$-1.52 Million | CA$230.46K | ▼ -49.4% |
| 2024 | -4.42x | CA$-699.04K | CA$158.26K | ▼ -408.8% |
| 2023 | -0.87x | CA$-262.08K | CA$301.91K | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2022 | -0.76x | CA$-265.92K | CA$349.69K | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2021 | -13.89x | CA$-444.01K | CA$31.98K | ▼ -1670.3% |
| 2020 | -0.78x | CA$-221.00K | CA$281.73K | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2019 | -2.85x | CA$-144.35K | CA$50.60K | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2018 | -9.02x | CA$-193.03K | CA$21.40K | ▼ -844.1% |
| 2017 | -0.96x | CA$-64.66K | CA$67.67K | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2016 | -6.56x | CA$-192.72K | CA$29.40K | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2015 | -8.18x | CA$-184.82K | CA$22.59K | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2014 | -7.18x | CA$-210.64K | CA$29.34K | ▲ +61.2% |
| 2013 | -18.48x | CA$-313.47K | CA$16.96K | ▼ -822.2% |
| 2012 | -2.00x | CA$-424.28K | CA$211.73K | ▼ -256.9% |
| 2011 | -0.56x | CA$-596.65K | CA$1.06 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2010 | -0.63x | CA$-477.55K | CA$758.64K | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2009 | -1.05x | CA$-169.68K | CA$162.30K | ▼ -141.0% |
| 2008 | -0.43x | CA$-227.55K | CA$524.49K | ▲ +53.7% |
| 2007 | -0.94x | CA$-352.63K | CA$376.21K | ▲ +68.5% |
| 2006 | -2.98x | CA$-347.43K | CA$116.75K | ▼ -377.5% |
| 2005 | -0.62x | CA$-175.75K | CA$282.02K | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2004 | -1.72x | CA$-387.40K | CA$225.25K | ▼ -243.4% |
| 2003 | -0.50x | CA$-103.73K | CA$207.13K | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2002 | -1.27x | CA$-151.00K | CA$118.58K | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2001 | -0.83x | CA$-136.20K | CA$164.84K | — |