Qyou Media Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Qyou Media Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Qyou Media Inc (QYOU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$173.54K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$12.99 Million) in one year. Check Qyou Media Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Qyou Media Inc (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Qyou Media Inc from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Qyou Media Inc across 30 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Qyou Media Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Qyou Media Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Qyou Media Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Qyou Media Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see QYOU cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | CA$795.17K | CA$11.12 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | CA$2.63 Million | CA$13.58 Million | ▲ +195.6% |
| 2023 | -0.20x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$8.84 Million | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2022 | -0.56x | CA$-4.85 Million | CA$8.67 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2020 | -1.19x | CA$-6.31 Million | CA$5.30 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 2019 | -0.76x | CA$-2.59 Million | CA$3.41 Million | ▲ +66.6% |
| 2018 | -2.27x | CA$-3.96 Million | CA$1.74 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2017 | -2.08x | CA$-4.71 Million | CA$2.27 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2017 | -4.42x | CA$-5.26 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2016 | -4.42x | CA$-5.26 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▼ -152.3% |
| 2016 | -1.75x | CA$-153.33K | CA$87.51K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2015 | -1.75x | CA$-153.33K | CA$87.51K | ▼ -63.8% |
| 2014 | -1.07x | CA$-87.26K | CA$81.58K | ▲ +25.0% |
| 2013 | -1.43x | CA$-77.56K | CA$54.35K | ▼ -973.7% |
| 2012 | -0.13x | CA$-87.17K | CA$655.92K | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2011 | -0.28x | CA$-50.88K | CA$179.22K | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2010 | -0.47x | CA$-70.15K | CA$150.15K | ▼ -543.8% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | CA$12.43K | CA$118.01K | ▲ +102.3% |
| 2008 | -4.63x | CA$-89.13K | CA$19.24K | ▼ -3324.7% |
| 2007 | -0.14x | CA$-5.58K | CA$41.23K | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2006 | -3.32x | CA$-66.05K | CA$19.88K | ▼ -350.3% |
| 2005 | -0.74x | CA$-27.99K | CA$37.94K | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2004 | -1.52x | CA$-35.33K | CA$23.18K | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2003 | -1.49x | CA$-24.92K | CA$16.69K | ▼ -106.7% |
| 2002 | -0.72x | CA$-16.79K | CA$23.25K | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2001 | -0.50x | CA$-23.27K | CA$46.23K | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2000 | -1.02x | CA$-42.56K | CA$41.86K | ▼ -1061.4% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | CA$18.43K | CA$174.29K | ▲ +335.8% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | CA$-6.14K | CA$136.93K | ▲ +86.6% |
| 1997 | -0.33x | CA$-251.87K | CA$753.97K | — |