Qyou Media Inc (QYOU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Qyou Media Inc (QYOU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$15.07 Million) in one year. See Qyou Media Inc (QYOU) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Qyou Media Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Qyou Media Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore Qyou Media Inc equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Qyou Media Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Qyou Media Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Qyou Media Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.01x | CA$-188.75K | CA$13.58 Million | ▲ +93.1% |
| 2023 | -0.20x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$8.84 Million | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2022 | -0.56x | CA$-4.85 Million | CA$8.67 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2020 | -1.19x | CA$-6.31 Million | CA$5.30 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 2019 | -0.76x | CA$-2.59 Million | CA$3.41 Million | ▲ +66.6% |
| 2018 | -2.27x | CA$-3.96 Million | CA$1.74 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2017 | -2.08x | CA$-4.71 Million | CA$2.27 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2017 | -4.42x | CA$-5.26 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2016 | -4.42x | CA$-5.26 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▼ -152.3% |
| 2016 | -1.75x | CA$-153.33K | CA$87.51K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2015 | -1.75x | CA$-153.33K | CA$87.51K | ▼ -63.8% |
| 2014 | -1.07x | CA$-87.26K | CA$81.58K | ▲ +25.0% |
| 2013 | -1.43x | CA$-77.56K | CA$54.35K | ▼ -973.7% |
| 2012 | -0.13x | CA$-87.17K | CA$655.92K | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2011 | -0.28x | CA$-50.88K | CA$179.22K | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2010 | -0.47x | CA$-70.15K | CA$150.15K | ▼ -543.8% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | CA$12.43K | CA$118.01K | ▲ +102.3% |
| 2008 | -4.63x | CA$-89.13K | CA$19.24K | ▼ -3324.7% |
| 2007 | -0.14x | CA$-5.58K | CA$41.23K | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2006 | -3.32x | CA$-66.05K | CA$19.88K | ▼ -350.3% |
| 2005 | -0.74x | CA$-27.99K | CA$37.94K | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2004 | -1.52x | CA$-35.33K | CA$23.18K | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2003 | -1.49x | CA$-24.92K | CA$16.69K | ▼ -106.7% |
| 2002 | -0.72x | CA$-16.79K | CA$23.25K | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2001 | -0.50x | CA$-23.27K | CA$46.23K | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2000 | -1.02x | CA$-42.56K | CA$41.86K | ▼ -1061.4% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | CA$18.43K | CA$174.29K | ▲ +335.8% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | CA$-6.14K | CA$136.93K | ▲ +86.6% |
| 1997 | -0.33x | CA$-251.87K | CA$753.97K | — |