Qyou Media Inc (QYOU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Qyou Media Inc (QYOU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$15.07 Million) in one year. Check Qyou Media Inc (QYOU) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Qyou Media Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Qyou Media Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore Qyou Media Inc balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Qyou Media Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Qyou Media Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Qyou Media Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.01x | CA$-188.75K | CA$13.58 Million | ▲ +93.1% |
| 2023 | -0.20x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$8.84 Million | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2022 | -0.56x | CA$-4.85 Million | CA$8.67 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2020 | -1.19x | CA$-6.31 Million | CA$5.30 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 2019 | -0.76x | CA$-2.59 Million | CA$3.41 Million | ▲ +66.6% |
| 2018 | -2.27x | CA$-3.96 Million | CA$1.74 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2017 | -2.08x | CA$-4.71 Million | CA$2.27 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2017 | -4.42x | CA$-5.26 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2016 | -4.42x | CA$-5.26 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▼ -152.3% |
| 2016 | -1.75x | CA$-153.33K | CA$87.51K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2015 | -1.75x | CA$-153.33K | CA$87.51K | ▼ -63.8% |
| 2014 | -1.07x | CA$-87.26K | CA$81.58K | ▲ +25.0% |
| 2013 | -1.43x | CA$-77.56K | CA$54.35K | ▼ -973.7% |
| 2012 | -0.13x | CA$-87.17K | CA$655.92K | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2011 | -0.28x | CA$-50.88K | CA$179.22K | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2010 | -0.47x | CA$-70.15K | CA$150.15K | ▼ -543.8% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | CA$12.43K | CA$118.01K | ▲ +102.3% |
| 2008 | -4.63x | CA$-89.13K | CA$19.24K | ▼ -3324.7% |
| 2007 | -0.14x | CA$-5.58K | CA$41.23K | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2006 | -3.32x | CA$-66.05K | CA$19.88K | ▼ -350.3% |
| 2005 | -0.74x | CA$-27.99K | CA$37.94K | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2004 | -1.52x | CA$-35.33K | CA$23.18K | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2003 | -1.49x | CA$-24.92K | CA$16.69K | ▼ -106.7% |
| 2002 | -0.72x | CA$-16.79K | CA$23.25K | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2001 | -0.50x | CA$-23.27K | CA$46.23K | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2000 | -1.02x | CA$-42.56K | CA$41.86K | ▼ -1061.4% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | CA$18.43K | CA$174.29K | ▲ +335.8% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | CA$-6.14K | CA$136.93K | ▲ +86.6% |
| 1997 | -0.33x | CA$-251.87K | CA$753.97K | — |