Qyou Media Inc (QYOU) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Qyou Media Inc (QYOU) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 21.1% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$665.18K) from net assets (CA$842.59K) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See net assets of Qyou Media Inc for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Qyou Media Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1997–2023)
This chart shows how Qyou Media Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 27 annual periods from 1997 to 2023. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 21.1%, reflecting net assets of CA$842.59K with intangible assets of CA$665.18K CAD. Also explore Qyou Media Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Qyou Media Inc (1997–2023)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Qyou Media Inc from 1997 to 2023, covering 27 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see QYOU market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | -29.8% | CA$1.88 Million | CA$2.45 Million | CA$10.72 Million | ▼ -104.2 pp |
| 2022 | 74.4% | CA$7.40 Million | CA$1.89 Million | CA$16.07 Million | ▼ -16.5 pp |
| 2020 | 90.9% | CA$11.06 Million | CA$1.01 Million | CA$16.37 Million | ▲ +42.3 pp |
| 2018 | 48.6% | CA$2.00 Million | CA$1.03 Million | CA$3.75 Million | ▲ +20.6 pp |
| 2017 | 28.1% | CA$3.03 Million | CA$2.18 Million | CA$5.30 Million | ▼ -51.7 pp |
| 2017 | 79.8% | CA$3.68 Million | CA$745.63K | CA$4.87 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 79.8% | CA$3.68 Million | CA$745.63K | CA$4.87 Million | ▲ +128.4 pp |
| 2016 | -48.6% | CA$365.06K | CA$542.54K | CA$452.57K | ▼ -126.3 pp |
| 2015 | 77.7% | CA$365.06K | CA$81.45K | CA$452.57K | ▼ -22.3 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$52.14K | CA$0.00 | CA$133.71K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$166.56K | CA$0.00 | CA$220.91K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$644.04K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.30 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$713.34K | CA$0.00 | CA$892.55K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$805.24K | CA$0.00 | CA$955.38K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$888.03K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.01 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$1.02 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.04 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$632.30K | CA$0.00 | CA$673.53K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | CA$718.86K | CA$0.00 | CA$738.75K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$758.88K | CA$0.00 | CA$796.82K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$772.74K | CA$0.00 | CA$795.91K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$394.45K | CA$0.00 | CA$411.15K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | CA$412.80K | CA$0.00 | CA$436.05K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | CA$416.56K | CA$0.00 | CA$462.79K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | CA$439.23K | CA$0.00 | CA$481.09K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$102.99K | CA$0.00 | CA$277.28K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | CA$786.78K | CA$0.00 | CA$923.71K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | CA$1.33 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.09 Million | — |