Route1 Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Route1 Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Route1 Inc (ROI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$250.95K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$8.59 Million) in one year. Check Route1 Inc (ROI) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Route1 Inc (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Route1 Inc from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Route1 Inc across 28 annual periods. Check Route1 Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Route1 Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
Route1 Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Route1 Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Route1 Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.09x | CA$887.52K | CA$9.76 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | CA$686.82K | CA$8.96 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | CA$602.27K | CA$10.59 Million | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | CA$1.05 Million | CA$12.37 Million | ▲ +297.4% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | CA$256.27K | CA$12.04 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | CA$328.23K | CA$11.65 Million | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | CA$419.46K | CA$5.21 Million | ▲ +124.3% |
| 2017 | -0.33x | CA$-641.08K | CA$1.93 Million | ▼ -154.1% |
| 2016 | 0.61x | CA$1.59 Million | CA$2.59 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2015 | 0.43x | CA$876.16K | CA$2.06 Million | ▼ -34.2% |
| 2014 | 0.65x | CA$1.31 Million | CA$2.03 Million | ▲ +178.7% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | CA$430.17K | CA$1.85 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2012 | 0.86x | CA$1.63 Million | CA$1.89 Million | ▲ +2747.5% |
| 2011 | -0.03x | CA$-245.89K | CA$7.54 Million | ▲ +91.5% |
| 2010 | -0.38x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$2.86 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2009 | -0.65x | CA$-2.37 Million | CA$3.62 Million | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2008 | -1.55x | CA$-4.09 Million | CA$2.63 Million | ▲ +61.3% |
| 2007 | -4.02x | CA$-6.72 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2006 | -4.52x | CA$-8.23 Million | CA$1.82 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2005 | -3.95x | CA$-5.76 Million | CA$1.46 Million | ▼ -92.0% |
| 2004 | -2.06x | CA$-1.99 Million | CA$968.47K | ▼ -351.0% |
| 2003 | -0.46x | CA$-541.91K | CA$1.19 Million | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2002 | -0.39x | CA$-384.62K | CA$997.31K | ▼ -46.5% |
| 2001 | -0.26x | CA$-149.88K | CA$569.18K | ▲ +77.7% |
| 2000 | -1.18x | CA$-546.49K | CA$461.93K | ▼ -4291.3% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | CA$-27.26K | CA$1.01 Million | ▲ +95.1% |
| 1998 | -0.55x | CA$-849.71K | CA$1.53 Million | ▼ -326.6% |
| 1997 | -0.13x | CA$-186.68K | CA$1.44 Million | — |