Roscan Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Roscan Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Roscan Gold Corp (ROS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.13x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-615.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.87 Million) in one year. Check ROS cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Roscan Gold Corp (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Roscan Gold Corp from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Roscan Gold Corp across 25 annual periods. Check Roscan Gold Corp (ROS) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Roscan Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Roscan Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Roscan Gold Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ROS cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.61x | CA$-2.23 Million | CA$3.68 Million | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2024 | -0.69x | CA$-1.98 Million | CA$2.87 Million | ▲ +36.2% |
| 2023 | -1.08x | CA$-2.76 Million | CA$2.56 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2022 | -9.91x | CA$-13.29 Million | CA$1.34 Million | ▲ +56.7% |
| 2021 | -22.87x | CA$-24.84 Million | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -435.8% |
| 2020 | -4.27x | CA$-15.93 Million | CA$3.73 Million | ▲ +62.1% |
| 2019 | -11.27x | CA$-4.67 Million | CA$414.46K | ▼ -337.2% |
| 2018 | -2.58x | CA$-1.51 Million | CA$584.68K | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2017 | -4.40x | CA$-419.74K | CA$95.50K | ▼ -2398.1% |
| 2016 | -0.18x | CA$-41.65K | CA$236.71K | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2015 | -0.14x | CA$-21.30K | CA$147.28K | ▲ +72.8% |
| 2014 | -0.53x | CA$-36.40K | CA$68.48K | ▲ +92.2% |
| 2013 | -6.85x | CA$-149.12K | CA$21.78K | ▼ -1293.0% |
| 2012 | -0.49x | CA$-46.78K | CA$95.18K | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2011 | -3.37x | CA$-100.92K | CA$29.96K | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2010 | -6.02x | CA$-143.48K | CA$23.83K | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2009 | -5.91x | CA$-159.72K | CA$27.03K | ▼ -40.9% |
| 2008 | -4.19x | CA$-366.47K | CA$87.38K | ▼ -138.0% |
| 2007 | -1.76x | CA$-154.38K | CA$87.62K | ▲ +61.4% |
| 2006 | -4.56x | CA$-253.28K | CA$55.55K | ▼ -93.9% |
| 2005 | -2.35x | CA$-341.42K | CA$145.15K | ▼ -137.7% |
| 2004 | -0.99x | CA$-99.58K | CA$100.63K | ▼ -507.7% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | CA$15.37K | CA$63.34K | ▲ +111.4% |
| 2002 | -2.13x | CA$-147.24K | CA$69.02K | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2001 | -2.29x | CA$-151.85K | CA$66.19K | — |