Roscan Gold Corp (ROS) — Net Asset Quality Index
Roscan Gold Corp (ROS) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -350.8% as of January 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$1.08 Million minus total liabilities of CA$4.87 Million yields net assets of CA$-3.79 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check ROS asset resilience ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Roscan Gold Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2025)
This chart shows how Roscan Gold Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 25 annual periods from 2001 to 2025. As of January 2026, the index stands at -350.8%, representing net assets of CA$-3.79 Million against total assets of CA$1.08 Million CAD. See ROS net working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Roscan Gold Corp (2001–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Roscan Gold Corp from 2001 to 2025, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market cap of Roscan Gold Corp.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -424.4% | CA$-2.98 Million | CA$701.77K | CA$3.68 Million | ▼ -307.9 pp |
| 2024 | -116.5% | CA$-1.55 Million | CA$1.33 Million | CA$2.87 Million | ▲ +1459.8 pp |
| 2023 | -1576.3% | CA$-2.41 Million | CA$152.69K | CA$2.56 Million | ▼ -728.1 pp |
| 2022 | -848.2% | CA$-1.20 Million | CA$141.43K | CA$1.34 Million | ▼ -933.1 pp |
| 2021 | 84.8% | CA$6.08 Million | CA$7.16 Million | CA$1.09 Million | ▲ +112.6 pp |
| 2020 | -27.7% | CA$-810.29K | CA$2.92 Million | CA$3.73 Million | ▼ -9.4 pp |
| 2019 | -18.3% | CA$-64.09K | CA$350.37K | CA$414.46K | ▼ -70.5 pp |
| 2018 | 52.3% | CA$639.91K | CA$1.22 Million | CA$584.68K | ▲ +367.9 pp |
| 2017 | -315.6% | CA$-72.52K | CA$22.98K | CA$95.50K | ▲ +4815.5 pp |
| 2016 | -5131.1% | CA$-232.18K | CA$4.53K | CA$236.71K | ▼ -2551.8 pp |
| 2015 | -2579.2% | CA$-141.78K | CA$5.50K | CA$147.28K | ▼ -1540.5 pp |
| 2014 | -1038.8% | CA$-62.47K | CA$6.01K | CA$68.48K | ▼ -1079.6 pp |
| 2013 | 40.9% | CA$15.05K | CA$36.84K | CA$21.78K | ▲ +886.8 pp |
| 2012 | -846.0% | CA$-85.12K | CA$10.06K | CA$95.18K | ▼ -881.5 pp |
| 2011 | 35.5% | CA$16.50K | CA$46.47K | CA$29.96K | ▼ -59.2 pp |
| 2010 | 94.7% | CA$428.52K | CA$452.35K | CA$23.83K | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2009 | 95.5% | CA$568.22K | CA$595.25K | CA$27.03K | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2008 | 92.2% | CA$1.04 Million | CA$1.13 Million | CA$87.38K | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2007 | 94.1% | CA$1.40 Million | CA$1.49 Million | CA$87.62K | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2006 | 97.5% | CA$2.16 Million | CA$2.22 Million | CA$55.55K | ▲ +14.8 pp |
| 2005 | 82.7% | CA$692.09K | CA$837.25K | CA$145.15K | ▲ +119.7 pp |
| 2004 | -37.0% | CA$-27.19K | CA$73.44K | CA$100.63K | ▲ +134.7 pp |
| 2003 | -171.7% | CA$-40.03K | CA$23.31K | CA$63.34K | ▲ +978.9 pp |
| 2002 | -1150.7% | CA$-63.51K | CA$5.52K | CA$69.02K | ▼ -1224.5 pp |
| 2001 | 73.8% | CA$186.47K | CA$252.66K | CA$66.19K | — |