Strikepoint Gold Inc (SKP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Strikepoint Gold Inc (SKP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.16x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.89 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.64 Million) in one year. See SKP FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Strikepoint Gold Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Strikepoint Gold Inc across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Strikepoint Gold Inc (SKP) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Strikepoint Gold Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Strikepoint Gold Inc. Check Strikepoint Gold Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -6.05x | CA$-3.09 Million | CA$510.46K | ▲ +53.3% |
| 2024 | -12.94x | CA$-4.01 Million | CA$309.80K | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2023 | -10.42x | CA$-2.84 Million | CA$272.58K | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2022 | -12.51x | CA$-3.74 Million | CA$299.35K | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2021 | -8.19x | CA$-5.32 Million | CA$648.84K | ▼ -136.4% |
| 2020 | -3.47x | CA$-2.59 Million | CA$746.30K | ▲ +90.5% |
| 2019 | -36.33x | CA$-3.75 Million | CA$103.16K | ▼ -63.2% |
| 2018 | -22.26x | CA$-6.12 Million | CA$275.06K | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2017 | -15.55x | CA$-3.34 Million | CA$214.82K | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2016 | -11.83x | CA$-461.14K | CA$38.99K | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2015 | -43.82x | CA$-657.43K | CA$15.00K | ▼ -114.6% |
| 2014 | -20.42x | CA$-499.34K | CA$24.45K | ▼ -184.9% |
| 2013 | -7.17x | CA$-268.71K | CA$37.48K | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2012 | -7.31x | CA$-1.33 Million | CA$182.46K | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2011 | -8.95x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$156.27K | ▲ +43.9% |
| 2010 | -15.97x | CA$-3.38 Million | CA$211.58K | ▼ -337.1% |
| 2009 | -3.65x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$334.92K | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2008 | -5.11x | CA$-907.50K | CA$177.44K | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2007 | -4.00x | CA$-601.16K | CA$150.24K | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2006 | -4.85x | CA$-732.37K | CA$150.94K | ▼ -86.3% |
| 2005 | -2.60x | CA$-415.75K | CA$159.61K | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2004 | -9.64x | CA$-930.43K | CA$96.50K | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2003 | -9.61x | CA$-668.25K | CA$69.53K | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2002 | -6.67x | CA$-758.64K | CA$113.69K | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2001 | -6.73x | CA$-530.50K | CA$78.84K | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2000 | -8.17x | CA$-777.12K | CA$95.12K | ▲ +76.2% |
| 1999 | -34.32x | CA$-557.35K | CA$16.24K | ▼ -127.4% |
| 1998 | -15.09x | CA$-522.33K | CA$34.61K | ▼ -19.5% |
| 1997 | -12.63x | CA$-606.18K | CA$48.00K | — |