Strikepoint Gold Inc (SKP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Strikepoint Gold Inc (SKP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.14x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-584.17K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$510.46K) in one year. See how much free cash does Strikepoint Gold Inc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Strikepoint Gold Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Strikepoint Gold Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore Strikepoint Gold Inc equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Strikepoint Gold Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Strikepoint Gold Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SKP market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -6.05x | CA$-3.09 Million | CA$510.46K | ▲ +53.3% |
| 2024 | -12.94x | CA$-4.01 Million | CA$309.80K | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2023 | -10.42x | CA$-2.84 Million | CA$272.58K | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2022 | -12.51x | CA$-3.74 Million | CA$299.35K | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2021 | -8.19x | CA$-5.32 Million | CA$648.84K | ▼ -136.4% |
| 2020 | -3.47x | CA$-2.59 Million | CA$746.30K | ▲ +90.5% |
| 2019 | -36.33x | CA$-3.75 Million | CA$103.16K | ▼ -63.2% |
| 2018 | -22.26x | CA$-6.12 Million | CA$275.06K | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2017 | -15.55x | CA$-3.34 Million | CA$214.82K | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2016 | -11.83x | CA$-461.14K | CA$38.99K | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2015 | -43.82x | CA$-657.43K | CA$15.00K | ▼ -114.6% |
| 2014 | -20.42x | CA$-499.34K | CA$24.45K | ▼ -184.9% |
| 2013 | -7.17x | CA$-268.71K | CA$37.48K | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2012 | -7.31x | CA$-1.33 Million | CA$182.46K | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2011 | -8.95x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$156.27K | ▲ +43.9% |
| 2010 | -15.97x | CA$-3.38 Million | CA$211.58K | ▼ -337.1% |
| 2009 | -3.65x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$334.92K | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2008 | -5.11x | CA$-907.50K | CA$177.44K | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2007 | -4.00x | CA$-601.16K | CA$150.24K | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2006 | -4.85x | CA$-732.37K | CA$150.94K | ▼ -86.3% |
| 2005 | -2.60x | CA$-415.75K | CA$159.61K | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2004 | -9.64x | CA$-930.43K | CA$96.50K | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2003 | -9.61x | CA$-668.25K | CA$69.53K | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2002 | -6.67x | CA$-758.64K | CA$113.69K | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2001 | -6.73x | CA$-530.50K | CA$78.84K | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2000 | -8.17x | CA$-777.12K | CA$95.12K | ▲ +76.2% |
| 1999 | -34.32x | CA$-557.35K | CA$16.24K | ▼ -127.4% |
| 1998 | -15.09x | CA$-522.33K | CA$34.61K | ▼ -19.5% |
| 1997 | -12.63x | CA$-606.18K | CA$48.00K | — |