Strikepoint Gold Inc (SKP) — Net Asset Quality Index
Strikepoint Gold Inc (SKP) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 85.8% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$3.61 Million minus total liabilities of CA$510.46K yields net assets of CA$3.10 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check asset resilience ratio of Strikepoint Gold Inc to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Strikepoint Gold Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1997–2025)
This chart shows how Strikepoint Gold Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1997 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 85.8%, representing net assets of CA$3.10 Million against total assets of CA$3.61 Million CAD. See SKP working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Strikepoint Gold Inc (1997–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Strikepoint Gold Inc from 1997 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see SKP stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 85.8% | CA$3.10 Million | CA$3.61 Million | CA$510.46K | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 2024 | 88.4% | CA$2.36 Million | CA$2.67 Million | CA$309.80K | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2023 | 86.6% | CA$1.76 Million | CA$2.03 Million | CA$272.58K | ▼ -7.3 pp |
| 2022 | 93.8% | CA$4.56 Million | CA$4.86 Million | CA$299.35K | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 2021 | 89.6% | CA$5.62 Million | CA$6.27 Million | CA$648.84K | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2020 | 88.3% | CA$5.63 Million | CA$6.38 Million | CA$746.30K | ▲ +4.7 pp |
| 2019 | 83.6% | CA$523.94K | CA$627.09K | CA$103.16K | ▲ +28.7 pp |
| 2018 | 54.8% | CA$334.15K | CA$609.21K | CA$275.06K | ▼ -41.3 pp |
| 2017 | 96.1% | CA$5.35 Million | CA$5.56 Million | CA$214.82K | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2016 | 96.0% | CA$931.67K | CA$970.65K | CA$38.99K | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2015 | 92.3% | CA$179.22K | CA$194.22K | CA$15.00K | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2014 | 93.6% | CA$355.84K | CA$380.29K | CA$24.45K | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2013 | 96.0% | CA$893.68K | CA$931.16K | CA$37.48K | ▲ +7.0 pp |
| 2012 | 88.9% | CA$1.47 Million | CA$1.65 Million | CA$182.46K | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2011 | 90.4% | CA$1.47 Million | CA$1.63 Million | CA$156.27K | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2010 | 95.8% | CA$4.89 Million | CA$5.10 Million | CA$211.58K | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2009 | 95.5% | CA$7.13 Million | CA$7.46 Million | CA$334.92K | ▲ +75.8 pp |
| 2008 | 19.7% | CA$43.50K | CA$220.95K | CA$177.44K | ▼ -63.3 pp |
| 2007 | 82.9% | CA$730.81K | CA$881.05K | CA$150.24K | ▲ +9.5 pp |
| 2006 | 73.5% | CA$418.28K | CA$569.22K | CA$150.94K | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2005 | 70.1% | CA$374.30K | CA$533.91K | CA$159.61K | ▲ +69.9 pp |
| 2004 | 0.2% | CA$157.00 | CA$96.65K | CA$96.50K | ▼ -66.1 pp |
| 2003 | 66.3% | CA$136.77K | CA$206.30K | CA$69.53K | ▲ +21.8 pp |
| 2002 | 44.5% | CA$91.05K | CA$204.74K | CA$113.69K | ▲ +44.9 pp |
| 2001 | -0.4% | CA$-311.00 | CA$78.53K | CA$78.84K | ▼ -34.8 pp |
| 2000 | 34.4% | CA$49.81K | CA$144.94K | CA$95.12K | ▼ -52.3 pp |
| 1999 | 86.7% | CA$105.70K | CA$121.94K | CA$16.24K | ▲ +21.5 pp |
| 1998 | 65.1% | CA$64.69K | CA$99.30K | CA$34.61K | ▼ -21.0 pp |
| 1997 | 86.2% | CA$298.78K | CA$346.78K | CA$48.00K | — |