Strikepoint Gold Inc (SKP) — Net Asset Quality Index
Strikepoint Gold Inc (SKP) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -161.9% as of June 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$624.79K minus total liabilities of CA$1.64 Million yields net assets of CA$-1.01 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read SKP total liabilities for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Strikepoint Gold Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1997–2025)
This chart shows how Strikepoint Gold Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1997 to 2025. As of June 2026, the index stands at -161.9%, representing net assets of CA$-1.01 Million against total assets of CA$624.79K CAD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Strikepoint Gold Inc stock valuation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Strikepoint Gold Inc (1997–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Strikepoint Gold Inc from 1997 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check SKP capital-intensive asset ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 85.8% | CA$3.10 Million | CA$3.61 Million | CA$510.46K | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 2024 | 88.4% | CA$2.36 Million | CA$2.67 Million | CA$309.80K | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2023 | 86.6% | CA$1.76 Million | CA$2.03 Million | CA$272.58K | ▼ -7.3 pp |
| 2022 | 93.8% | CA$4.56 Million | CA$4.86 Million | CA$299.35K | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 2021 | 89.6% | CA$5.62 Million | CA$6.27 Million | CA$648.84K | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2020 | 88.3% | CA$5.63 Million | CA$6.38 Million | CA$746.30K | ▲ +4.7 pp |
| 2019 | 83.6% | CA$523.94K | CA$627.09K | CA$103.16K | ▲ +28.7 pp |
| 2018 | 54.8% | CA$334.15K | CA$609.21K | CA$275.06K | ▼ -41.3 pp |
| 2017 | 96.1% | CA$5.35 Million | CA$5.56 Million | CA$214.82K | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2016 | 96.0% | CA$931.67K | CA$970.65K | CA$38.99K | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2015 | 92.3% | CA$179.22K | CA$194.22K | CA$15.00K | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2014 | 93.6% | CA$355.84K | CA$380.29K | CA$24.45K | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2013 | 96.0% | CA$893.68K | CA$931.16K | CA$37.48K | ▲ +7.0 pp |
| 2012 | 88.9% | CA$1.47 Million | CA$1.65 Million | CA$182.46K | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2011 | 90.4% | CA$1.47 Million | CA$1.63 Million | CA$156.27K | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2010 | 95.8% | CA$4.89 Million | CA$5.10 Million | CA$211.58K | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2009 | 95.5% | CA$7.13 Million | CA$7.46 Million | CA$334.92K | ▲ +75.8 pp |
| 2008 | 19.7% | CA$43.50K | CA$220.95K | CA$177.44K | ▼ -63.3 pp |
| 2007 | 82.9% | CA$730.81K | CA$881.05K | CA$150.24K | ▲ +9.5 pp |
| 2006 | 73.5% | CA$418.28K | CA$569.22K | CA$150.94K | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2005 | 70.1% | CA$374.30K | CA$533.91K | CA$159.61K | ▲ +69.9 pp |
| 2004 | 0.2% | CA$157.00 | CA$96.65K | CA$96.50K | ▼ -66.1 pp |
| 2003 | 66.3% | CA$136.77K | CA$206.30K | CA$69.53K | ▲ +21.8 pp |
| 2002 | 44.5% | CA$91.05K | CA$204.74K | CA$113.69K | ▲ +44.9 pp |
| 2001 | -0.4% | CA$-311.00 | CA$78.53K | CA$78.84K | ▼ -34.8 pp |
| 2000 | 34.4% | CA$49.81K | CA$144.94K | CA$95.12K | ▼ -52.3 pp |
| 1999 | 86.7% | CA$105.70K | CA$121.94K | CA$16.24K | ▲ +21.5 pp |
| 1998 | 65.1% | CA$64.69K | CA$99.30K | CA$34.61K | ▼ -21.0 pp |
| 1997 | 86.2% | CA$298.78K | CA$346.78K | CA$48.00K | — |