PUMA SE Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
PUMA SE cash flow-to-debt ratio. PUMA SE (PUM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.11x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of €-524.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (€4.96 Billion) in one year. Check PUMA SE (PUM) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of PUMA SE (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of PUMA SE from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for PUMA SE across 28 annual periods. Check PUMA SE (PUM) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
PUMA SE Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
PUMA SE cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for PUMA SE. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see PUM cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (EUR) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.16x | €694.80 Million | €4.31 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | €653.60 Million | €4.06 Billion | ▲ +63.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | €418.30 Million | €4.23 Billion | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | €460.10 Million | €3.45 Billion | ▼ -7.6% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | €421.50 Million | €2.92 Billion | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | €548.80 Million | €2.46 Billion | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | €278.10 Million | €1.49 Billion | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | €227.20 Million | €1.20 Billion | ▲ +51.0% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | €131.10 Million | €1.04 Billion | ▲ +439.2% |
| 2015 | -0.04x | €-37.10 Million | €1.00 Billion | ▼ -127.3% |
| 2014 | 0.14x | €126.40 Million | €931.60 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | €109.30 Million | €811.20 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | €156.70 Million | €932.90 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | €126.80 Million | €976.60 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2010 | 0.17x | €169.40 Million | €980.20 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | €310.60 Million | €774.30 Million | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | €219.10 Million | €721.50 Million | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | €433.70 Million | €716.20 Million | ▲ +41.9% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | €287.40 Million | €673.60 Million | ▼ -47.8% |
| 2005 | 0.82x | €368.20 Million | €450.10 Million | ▼ -16.4% |
| 2004 | 0.98x | €386.00 Million | €394.60 Million | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2003 | 0.52x | €165.03 Million | €316.28 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2002 | 0.44x | €119.09 Million | €273.20 Million | ▲ +117.1% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | €43.74 Million | €217.86 Million | ▲ +122.4% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | €16.27 Million | €180.22 Million | ▲ +9.2% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | €12.76 Million | €154.43 Million | ▲ +63138.8% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | €-32.00K | €244.06 Million | ▲ +99.9% |
| 1997 | -0.09x | €-14.45 Million | €154.22 Million | — |