DexCom Inc (DXCM) — Net Asset Quality Index
DexCom Inc (DXCM) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 44.6% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $6.63 Billion minus total liabilities of $3.68 Billion yields net assets of $2.96 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See DexCom Inc defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
DexCom Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2003–2025)
This chart shows how DexCom Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 23 annual periods from 2003 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 44.6%, representing net assets of $2.96 Billion against total assets of $6.63 Billion USD. Explore cash efficiency ratio of DexCom Inc to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for DexCom Inc (2003–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for DexCom Inc from 2003 to 2025, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see DXCM market cap overview.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 43.3% | $2.75 Billion | $6.34 Billion | $3.59 Billion | ▲ +10.9 pp |
| 2024 | 32.4% | $2.10 Billion | $6.48 Billion | $4.38 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2023 | 33.0% | $2.07 Billion | $6.26 Billion | $4.20 Billion | ▼ -6.5 pp |
| 2022 | 39.5% | $2.13 Billion | $5.39 Billion | $3.26 Billion | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2021 | 41.4% | $2.04 Billion | $4.93 Billion | $2.89 Billion | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2020 | 42.6% | $1.83 Billion | $4.29 Billion | $2.46 Billion | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 2019 | 36.9% | $882.60 Million | $2.40 Billion | $1.51 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2018 | 34.6% | $663.30 Million | $1.92 Billion | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -11.8 pp |
| 2017 | 46.4% | $419.40 Million | $904.10 Million | $484.70 Million | ▼ -24.1 pp |
| 2016 | 70.5% | $283.80 Million | $402.80 Million | $119.00 Million | ▼ -5.3 pp |
| 2015 | 75.8% | $221.20 Million | $292.00 Million | $70.80 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2014 | 75.9% | $140.20 Million | $184.60 Million | $44.40 Million | ▲ +7.3 pp |
| 2013 | 68.7% | $84.10 Million | $122.50 Million | $38.40 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2012 | 72.6% | $77.00 Million | $106.00 Million | $29.00 Million | ▼ -14.1 pp |
| 2011 | 86.7% | $104.49 Million | $120.47 Million | $15.98 Million | ▲ +7.7 pp |
| 2010 | 79.0% | $60.99 Million | $77.16 Million | $16.17 Million | ▲ +118.3 pp |
| 2009 | -39.3% | $-18.45 Million | $46.95 Million | $65.39 Million | ▲ +47.7 pp |
| 2008 | -87.0% | $-38.61 Million | $44.37 Million | $82.98 Million | ▼ -96.2 pp |
| 2007 | 9.2% | $7.12 Million | $77.26 Million | $70.14 Million | ▼ -78.8 pp |
| 2006 | 88.0% | $56.83 Million | $64.55 Million | $7.72 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2005 | 87.1% | $49.41 Million | $56.73 Million | $7.31 Million | ▲ +255.1 pp |
| 2004 | -168.0% | $-49.31 Million | $29.36 Million | $78.67 Million | ▼ -11.0 pp |
| 2003 | -157.0% | $-32.60 Million | $20.77 Million | $53.37 Million | — |