EDAP TMS S.A. (FOCL) — Net Asset Quality Index
EDAP TMS S.A. (FOCL) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -4.3% as of June 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $74.55 Million minus total liabilities of $77.77 Million yields net assets of $-3.23 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read FOCL total liabilities for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
EDAP TMS S.A. Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2006–2025)
This chart shows how EDAP TMS S.A.'s Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 20 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of June 2026, the index stands at -4.3%, representing net assets of $-3.23 Million against total assets of $74.55 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see FOCL stock market capitalisation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for EDAP TMS S.A. (2006–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for EDAP TMS S.A. from 2006 to 2025, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. See EDAP TMS S.A. net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24.6% | $19.41 Million | $79.00 Million | $59.58 Million | ▼ -22.9 pp |
| 2024 | 47.5% | $42.35 Million | $89.12 Million | $46.77 Million | ▼ -14.7 pp |
| 2023 | 62.2% | $62.88 Million | $101.13 Million | $38.25 Million | ▼ -8.7 pp |
| 2022 | 70.8% | $76.45 Million | $107.92 Million | $31.47 Million | ▲ +6.0 pp |
| 2021 | 64.8% | $56.92 Million | $87.82 Million | $30.90 Million | ▲ +15.3 pp |
| 2020 | 49.5% | $33.46 Million | $67.53 Million | $34.07 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2019 | 53.6% | $31.91 Million | $59.57 Million | $27.66 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2018 | 53.4% | $29.73 Million | $55.72 Million | $25.99 Million | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 2017 | 55.9% | $31.46 Million | $56.31 Million | $24.86 Million | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2016 | 53.0% | $26.04 Million | $49.14 Million | $23.10 Million | ▲ +15.0 pp |
| 2015 | 38.0% | $15.93 Million | $41.91 Million | $25.98 Million | ▼ -9.5 pp |
| 2014 | 47.5% | $18.49 Million | $38.91 Million | $20.42 Million | ▲ +13.0 pp |
| 2013 | 34.5% | $12.79 Million | $37.03 Million | $24.24 Million | ▲ +7.7 pp |
| 2012 | 26.8% | $10.76 Million | $40.14 Million | $29.38 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2011 | 27.0% | $11.31 Million | $41.85 Million | $30.54 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2010 | 24.8% | $11.94 Million | $48.21 Million | $36.27 Million | ▼ -6.4 pp |
| 2009 | 31.2% | $18.05 Million | $57.93 Million | $39.88 Million | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2008 | 39.2% | $23.90 Million | $60.97 Million | $37.08 Million | ▲ +7.0 pp |
| 2007 | 32.2% | $21.20 Million | $65.80 Million | $44.60 Million | ▼ -27.2 pp |
| 2006 | 59.4% | $25.45 Million | $42.82 Million | $17.37 Million | — |