EDAP TMS S.A. Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
EDAP TMS S.A. working capital to net assets ratio. EDAP TMS S.A. (FOCL) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of -687.1% as of June 2026. Working capital of $22.17 Million (current assets of $59.02 Million minus current liabilities of $36.85 Million) is measured against net assets of $-3.23 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check tangible equity quality of EDAP TMS S.A. to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of EDAP TMS S.A. (2006–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of EDAP TMS S.A. from 2006 to 2025. This chart shows how EDAP TMS S.A.'s Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 20 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at -687.1%, reflecting working capital of $22.17 Million against net assets of $-3.23 Million USD. See operational self-sufficiency of EDAP TMS S.A. to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
EDAP TMS S.A. Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2006–2025)
EDAP TMS S.A. working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2006 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for EDAP TMS S.A. from 2006 to 2025, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see EDAP TMS S.A. balance sheet assets.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 103.1% | $20.02 Million | $19.41 Million | $57.16 Million | $37.14 Million | ▲ +24.7 pp |
| 2024 | 78.4% | $33.20 Million | $42.35 Million | $72.36 Million | $39.15 Million | ▼ -11.0 pp |
| 2023 | 89.4% | $56.21 Million | $62.88 Million | $86.69 Million | $30.48 Million | ▼ -6.7 pp |
| 2022 | 96.1% | $73.44 Million | $76.45 Million | $96.61 Million | $23.17 Million | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2021 | 98.8% | $56.21 Million | $56.92 Million | $76.63 Million | $20.41 Million | ▲ +11.4 pp |
| 2020 | 87.4% | $29.23 Million | $33.46 Million | $55.54 Million | $26.31 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2019 | 86.5% | $27.62 Million | $31.91 Million | $47.25 Million | $19.64 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2018 | 90.6% | $26.94 Million | $29.73 Million | $46.16 Million | $19.22 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2017 | 89.5% | $28.15 Million | $31.46 Million | $47.52 Million | $19.37 Million | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2016 | 103.3% | $26.89 Million | $26.04 Million | $42.72 Million | $15.83 Million | ▼ -11.1 pp |
| 2015 | 114.3% | $18.22 Million | $15.93 Million | $35.89 Million | $17.68 Million | ▲ +19.7 pp |
| 2014 | 94.6% | $17.49 Million | $18.49 Million | $32.21 Million | $14.71 Million | ▼ -18.9 pp |
| 2013 | 113.5% | $14.52 Million | $12.79 Million | $30.49 Million | $15.97 Million | ▼ -28.7 pp |
| 2012 | 142.2% | $15.30 Million | $10.76 Million | $32.60 Million | $17.30 Million | ▲ +72.8 pp |
| 2011 | 69.4% | $7.85 Million | $11.31 Million | $34.71 Million | $26.86 Million | ▼ -101.5 pp |
| 2010 | 170.9% | $20.40 Million | $11.94 Million | $40.07 Million | $19.66 Million | ▲ +27.2 pp |
| 2009 | 143.7% | $25.93 Million | $18.05 Million | $47.70 Million | $21.77 Million | ▲ +19.6 pp |
| 2008 | 124.1% | $29.65 Million | $23.90 Million | $49.74 Million | $20.10 Million | ▼ -36.2 pp |
| 2007 | 160.3% | $33.98 Million | $21.20 Million | $52.82 Million | $18.84 Million | ▲ +80.2 pp |
| 2006 | 80.1% | $20.40 Million | $25.45 Million | $34.80 Million | $14.41 Million | — |