Genetic Technologies Ltd (GENE) — Net Asset Quality Index
Genetic Technologies Ltd (GENE) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 29.6% as of June 2024. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $6.19 Million minus total liabilities of $4.36 Million yields net assets of $1.83 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Genetic Technologies Ltd (GENE) liquid assets ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Genetic Technologies Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2000–2024)
This chart shows how Genetic Technologies Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 25 annual periods from 2000 to 2024. As of June 2024, the index stands at 29.6%, representing net assets of $1.83 Million against total assets of $6.19 Million USD. See how liquid is Genetic Technologies Ltd's working capital to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Genetic Technologies Ltd (2000–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Genetic Technologies Ltd from 2000 to 2024, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Genetic Technologies Ltd market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29.6% | $1.83 Million | $6.19 Million | $4.36 Million | ▼ -45.6 pp |
| 2023 | 75.1% | $11.16 Million | $14.86 Million | $3.69 Million | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2022 | 79.0% | $16.43 Million | $20.80 Million | $4.37 Million | ▼ -14.7 pp |
| 2021 | 93.7% | $21.53 Million | $22.97 Million | $1.44 Million | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 2020 | 89.5% | $13.99 Million | $15.63 Million | $1.64 Million | ▲ +35.3 pp |
| 2019 | 54.2% | $1.77 Million | $3.27 Million | $1.49 Million | ▼ -22.2 pp |
| 2018 | 76.4% | $4.71 Million | $6.17 Million | $1.45 Million | ▼ -11.0 pp |
| 2017 | 87.4% | $10.58 Million | $12.11 Million | $1.53 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2016 | 89.4% | $11.88 Million | $13.29 Million | $1.41 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2015 | 91.5% | $18.96 Million | $20.72 Million | $1.76 Million | ▲ +64.3 pp |
| 2014 | 27.2% | $1.83 Million | $6.73 Million | $4.90 Million | ▼ -42.1 pp |
| 2013 | 69.2% | $5.76 Million | $8.32 Million | $2.56 Million | ▼ -18.4 pp |
| 2012 | 87.6% | $14.40 Million | $16.44 Million | $2.04 Million | ▲ +11.2 pp |
| 2011 | 76.4% | $6.81 Million | $8.92 Million | $2.11 Million | ▲ +7.3 pp |
| 2010 | 69.1% | $5.72 Million | $8.28 Million | $2.56 Million | ▼ -9.4 pp |
| 2009 | 78.5% | $17.49 Million | $22.28 Million | $4.79 Million | ▼ -7.8 pp |
| 2008 | 86.3% | $20.83 Million | $24.15 Million | $3.32 Million | ▲ +5.6 pp |
| 2007 | 80.7% | $16.90 Million | $20.95 Million | $4.05 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2006 | 81.4% | $18.27 Million | $22.44 Million | $4.18 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2005 | 77.8% | $22.75 Million | $29.26 Million | $6.51 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2004 | 76.2% | $17.07 Million | $22.39 Million | $5.32 Million | ▼ -14.0 pp |
| 2003 | 90.2% | $27.28 Million | $30.25 Million | $2.97 Million | ▼ -4.2 pp |
| 2002 | 94.3% | $31.14 Million | $33.00 Million | $1.86 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2001 | 95.9% | $38.07 Million | $39.69 Million | $1.62 Million | ▲ +10.3 pp |
| 2000 | 85.6% | $7.58 Million | $8.85 Million | $1.27 Million | — |