Scisparc Ltd (SPRC) — Net Asset Quality Index
Scisparc Ltd (SPRC) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -1.6% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $5.14 Million minus total liabilities of $5.22 Million yields net assets of $-81.00K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Scisparc Ltd liquidity resilience to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Scisparc Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2006–2024)
This chart shows how Scisparc Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2006 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at -1.6%, representing net assets of $-81.00K against total assets of $5.14 Million USD. See Scisparc Ltd (SPRC) liquidity to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Scisparc Ltd (2006–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Scisparc Ltd from 2006 to 2024, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Scisparc Ltd (SPRC) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 86.4% | $8.94 Million | $10.35 Million | $1.41 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2023 | 85.7% | $9.59 Million | $11.18 Million | $1.59 Million | ▲ +24.9 pp |
| 2022 | 60.8% | $6.45 Million | $10.61 Million | $4.16 Million | ▼ -21.3 pp |
| 2021 | 82.1% | $8.14 Million | $9.92 Million | $1.77 Million | ▲ +26.3 pp |
| 2020 | 55.8% | $1.43 Million | $2.56 Million | $1.13 Million | ▲ +54.6 pp |
| 2019 | 1.2% | $14.00K | $1.15 Million | $1.14 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2018 | 1.7% | $77.00K | $4.56 Million | $4.48 Million | ▼ -86.0 pp |
| 2017 | 87.7% | $8.39 Million | $9.57 Million | $1.18 Million | ▲ +41.7 pp |
| 2016 | 46.0% | $572.71K | $1.24 Million | $672.02K | ▼ -23.3 pp |
| 2015 | 69.3% | $1.15 Million | $1.67 Million | $510.80K | ▲ +113.9 pp |
| 2014 | -44.5% | $-116.33K | $261.18K | $377.51K | ▼ -103.4 pp |
| 2013 | 58.9% | $995.26K | $1.69 Million | $695.76K | ▲ +23.2 pp |
| 2012 | 35.7% | $389.43K | $1.09 Million | $702.74K | ▼ -30.9 pp |
| 2011 | 66.5% | $2.95 Million | $4.43 Million | $1.48 Million | ▲ +15.5 pp |
| 2010 | 51.0% | $5.09 Million | $9.98 Million | $4.89 Million | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2009 | 46.1% | $5.64 Million | $12.22 Million | $6.58 Million | ▼ -28.9 pp |
| 2008 | 75.1% | $7.52 Million | $10.01 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +13.2 pp |
| 2007 | 61.8% | $9.41 Million | $15.22 Million | $5.81 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2006 | 62.3% | $6.98 Million | $11.22 Million | $4.23 Million | — |