Terawulf Inc (WULF) — Net Asset Quality Index
Terawulf Inc (WULF) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -1.1% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $7.01 Billion minus total liabilities of $7.09 Billion yields net assets of $-77.62 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See operational self-sufficiency of Terawulf Inc to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Terawulf Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2000–2025)
This chart shows how Terawulf Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 23 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at -1.1%, representing net assets of $-77.62 Million against total assets of $7.01 Billion USD. Explore how efficiently does Terawulf Inc generate cash to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Terawulf Inc (2000–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Terawulf Inc from 2000 to 2025, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see WULF stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.1% | $140.44 Million | $6.56 Billion | $6.42 Billion | ▼ -28.9 pp |
| 2024 | 31.0% | $244.44 Million | $787.51 Million | $543.07 Million | ▼ -27.8 pp |
| 2023 | 58.8% | $222.49 Million | $378.11 Million | $155.62 Million | ▲ +21.8 pp |
| 2022 | 37.1% | $117.75 Million | $317.69 Million | $199.93 Million | ▼ -9.4 pp |
| 2021 | 46.5% | $123.18 Million | $264.91 Million | $141.73 Million | ▼ -47.7 pp |
| 2020 | 94.2% | $28.27 Million | $30.00 Million | $1.74 Million | ▲ +21.6 pp |
| 2019 | 72.6% | $12.26 Million | $16.88 Million | $4.62 Million | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2018 | 75.3% | $13.11 Million | $17.42 Million | $4.31 Million | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2017 | 76.6% | $12.96 Million | $16.92 Million | $3.97 Million | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2016 | 73.6% | $13.46 Million | $18.30 Million | $4.84 Million | ▼ -16.3 pp |
| 2015 | 89.9% | $13.50 Million | $15.02 Million | $1.52 Million | ▲ +226.5 pp |
| 2014 | -136.6% | $-744.50K | $545.00K | $1.29 Million | ▲ +29.4 pp |
| 2013 | -166.0% | $-874.99K | $527.00K | $1.40 Million | ▲ +113.6 pp |
| 2012 | -279.7% | $-1.02 Million | $366.00K | $1.39 Million | ▼ -31.5 pp |
| 2011 | -248.2% | $-838.91K | $338.00K | $1.18 Million | ▲ +206.8 pp |
| 2010 | -455.0% | $-777.98K | $171.00K | $948.98K | ▲ +44.5 pp |
| 2009 | -499.5% | $-809.19K | $162.00K | $971.19K | ▲ +136.7 pp |
| 2008 | -636.2% | $-909.79K | $143.00K | $1.05 Million | ▼ -728.5 pp |
| 2007 | 92.3% | $11.05 Million | $11.97 Million | $925.70K | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2006 | 91.7% | $9.86 Million | $10.75 Million | $887.36K | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2005 | 90.1% | $8.48 Million | $9.41 Million | $931.29K | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2004 | 87.3% | $7.41 Million | $8.49 Million | $1.08 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2000 | 87.8% | $3.98 Million | $4.53 Million | $552.64K | — |