Aecom Technology Corporation (ACM) — Net Asset Quality Index
Aecom Technology Corporation (ACM) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 20.5% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $11.94 Billion minus total liabilities of $9.49 Billion yields net assets of $2.45 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check ACM asset liquidity ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Aecom Technology Corporation Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2002–2025)
This chart shows how Aecom Technology Corporation's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 23 annual periods from 2002 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 20.5%, representing net assets of $2.45 Billion against total assets of $11.94 Billion USD. See working capital to net assets of Aecom Technology Corporation to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Aecom Technology Corporation (2002–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Aecom Technology Corporation from 2002 to 2025, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Aecom Technology Corporation market cap and net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22.1% | $2.70 Billion | $12.20 Billion | $9.50 Billion | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2024 | 19.7% | $2.37 Billion | $12.06 Billion | $9.69 Billion | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2023 | 21.2% | $2.38 Billion | $11.23 Billion | $8.85 Billion | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2022 | 23.4% | $2.61 Billion | $11.14 Billion | $8.53 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2021 | 24.1% | $2.83 Billion | $11.73 Billion | $8.90 Billion | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2020 | 26.3% | $3.41 Billion | $13.00 Billion | $9.59 Billion | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2019 | 26.8% | $3.90 Billion | $14.55 Billion | $10.65 Billion | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2018 | 29.1% | $4.28 Billion | $14.68 Billion | $10.40 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2017 | 29.3% | $4.21 Billion | $14.40 Billion | $10.18 Billion | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2016 | 26.0% | $3.55 Billion | $13.67 Billion | $10.12 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2015 | 25.9% | $3.63 Billion | $14.01 Billion | $10.38 Billion | ▼ -11.2 pp |
| 2014 | 37.1% | $2.27 Billion | $6.12 Billion | $3.85 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2013 | 36.6% | $2.07 Billion | $5.67 Billion | $3.59 Billion | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2012 | 39.3% | $2.22 Billion | $5.66 Billion | $3.44 Billion | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2011 | 41.4% | $2.40 Billion | $5.79 Billion | $3.39 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2010 | 40.8% | $2.14 Billion | $5.24 Billion | $3.10 Billion | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2009 | 46.3% | $1.75 Billion | $3.79 Billion | $2.04 Billion | ▲ +6.2 pp |
| 2008 | 40.1% | $1.44 Billion | $3.60 Billion | $2.15 Billion | ▼ -12.0 pp |
| 2007 | 52.2% | $1.30 Billion | $2.49 Billion | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +67.1 pp |
| 2006 | -14.9% | $-272.19 Million | $1.83 Billion | $2.10 Billion | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2005 | -16.2% | $-230.16 Million | $1.42 Billion | $1.66 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2003 | -17.1% | $-181.00 Million | $1.06 Billion | $1.24 Billion | ▼ -5.9 pp |
| 2002 | -11.2% | $-108.00 Million | $965.00 Million | $1.07 Billion | — |