Eaton Vance Senior Income Closed Fund (EVF) — Net Asset Quality Index
Eaton Vance Senior Income Closed Fund (EVF) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 85.7% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $167.99 Million minus total liabilities of $24.06 Million yields net assets of $143.93 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check financial resilience of Eaton Vance Senior Income Closed Fund to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Eaton Vance Senior Income Closed Fund Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2006–2025)
This chart shows how Eaton Vance Senior Income Closed Fund's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 85.7%, representing net assets of $143.93 Million against total assets of $167.99 Million USD. See EVF working capital efficiency to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Eaton Vance Senior Income Closed Fund (2006–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Eaton Vance Senior Income Closed Fund from 2006 to 2025, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market value of Eaton Vance Senior Income Closed Fund.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 62.9% | $108.56 Million | $172.46 Million | $63.90 Million | ▼ -22.1 pp |
| 2024 | 85.1% | $144.76 Million | $170.11 Million | $25.35 Million | ▲ +23.4 pp |
| 2023 | 61.7% | $107.08 Million | $173.64 Million | $66.57 Million | ▼ -22.1 pp |
| 2022 | 83.7% | $143.82 Million | $171.74 Million | $27.93 Million | ▲ +10.6 pp |
| 2021 | 73.1% | $299.03 Million | $408.99 Million | $109.96 Million | ▲ +15.1 pp |
| 2020 | 58.1% | $272.26 Million | $468.99 Million | $196.73 Million | ▼ -13.6 pp |
| 2019 | 71.7% | $304.54 Million | $424.86 Million | $120.33 Million | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 2018 | 74.6% | $333.63 Million | $447.38 Million | $113.76 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2017 | 76.8% | $332.41 Million | $432.55 Million | $100.14 Million | ▼ -13.2 pp |
| 2016 | 90.0% | $361.80 Million | $401.83 Million | $40.03 Million | ▲ +6.1 pp |
| 2015 | 83.9% | $376.01 Million | $448.12 Million | $72.10 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2014 | 83.7% | $388.05 Million | $463.48 Million | $75.44 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2013 | 81.6% | $388.37 Million | $475.82 Million | $87.45 Million | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2008 | 77.7% | $383.03 Million | $492.97 Million | $109.94 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2007 | 76.6% | $430.99 Million | $562.40 Million | $131.41 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2006 | 77.7% | $428.90 Million | $551.95 Million | $123.05 Million | — |