Lombard et Medot SA (MLCAC) — Net Asset Quality Index
Lombard et Medot SA (MLCAC) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 41.4% as of December 2024. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of €33.33 Million minus total liabilities of €19.53 Million yields net assets of €13.80 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Lombard et Medot SA (MLCAC) asset resilience to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Lombard et Medot SA Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1998–2024)
This chart shows how Lombard et Medot SA's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 25 annual periods from 1998 to 2024. As of December 2024, the index stands at 41.4%, representing net assets of €13.80 Million against total assets of €33.33 Million EUR. See MLCAC working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Lombard et Medot SA (1998–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Lombard et Medot SA from 1998 to 2024, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Lombard et Medot SA market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (EUR) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41.4% | €13.80 Million | €33.33 Million | €19.53 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2023 | 39.0% | €13.82 Million | €35.44 Million | €21.62 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2022 | 39.0% | €13.71 Million | €35.10 Million | €21.40 Million | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 2021 | 42.0% | €13.78 Million | €32.85 Million | €19.07 Million | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2020 | 38.3% | €13.92 Million | €36.36 Million | €22.45 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2017 | 38.9% | €13.66 Million | €35.08 Million | €21.42 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2016 | 38.7% | €15.33 Million | €39.67 Million | €24.34 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2015 | 37.9% | €15.94 Million | €42.09 Million | €26.15 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2014 | 40.2% | €14.33 Million | €35.68 Million | €21.36 Million | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2013 | 42.9% | €14.68 Million | €34.20 Million | €19.52 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2012 | 42.8% | €14.70 Million | €34.39 Million | €19.68 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2011 | 44.3% | €15.10 Million | €34.11 Million | €19.01 Million | ▼ -8.1 pp |
| 2010 | 52.4% | €14.79 Million | €28.21 Million | €13.42 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2009 | 53.3% | €13.35 Million | €25.04 Million | €11.68 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2008 | 53.2% | €12.99 Million | €24.41 Million | €11.42 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2007 | 58.4% | €12.31 Million | €21.08 Million | €8.77 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2006 | 58.0% | €13.32 Million | €22.96 Million | €9.64 Million | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2005 | 53.1% | €14.12 Million | €26.59 Million | €12.47 Million | ▲ +10.4 pp |
| 2004 | 42.7% | €11.61 Million | €27.21 Million | €15.60 Million | ▲ +10.8 pp |
| 2003 | 31.9% | €13.94 Million | €43.71 Million | €29.77 Million | ▲ +10.2 pp |
| 2002 | 21.7% | €14.42 Million | €66.54 Million | €52.13 Million | ▼ -8.3 pp |
| 2001 | 30.0% | €18.38 Million | €61.36 Million | €42.98 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2000 | 30.1% | €16.87 Million | €56.07 Million | €39.20 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 1999 | 32.0% | €16.21 Million | €50.64 Million | €34.43 Million | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 1998 | 28.6% | €10.48 Million | €36.63 Million | €26.15 Million | — |