Lombard et Medot SA (MLCAC) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Lombard et Medot SA (MLCAC) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 185.7% as of December 2024. Working capital of €25.63 Million (current assets of €29.61 Million minus current liabilities of €3.98 Million) is measured against net assets of €13.80 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See MLCAC cash and liquid assets coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Lombard et Medot SA Working Capital to Net Assets (1998–2024)
This chart shows how Lombard et Medot SA's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 25 annual periods from 1998 to 2024. As of December 2024, the ratio stands at 185.7%, reflecting working capital of €25.63 Million against net assets of €13.80 Million EUR. For the complete balance sheet picture, see balance sheet size of Lombard et Medot SA.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Lombard et Medot SA (1998–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Lombard et Medot SA from 1998 to 2024, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check MLCAC asset resilience ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (EUR) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 185.7% | €25.63 Million | €13.80 Million | €29.61 Million | €3.98 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2023 | 190.9% | €26.37 Million | €13.82 Million | €31.59 Million | €5.22 Million | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2022 | 193.6% | €26.53 Million | €13.71 Million | €31.43 Million | €4.90 Million | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2021 | 196.9% | €27.15 Million | €13.78 Million | €29.28 Million | €2.14 Million | ▼ -18.4 pp |
| 2020 | 215.3% | €29.97 Million | €13.92 Million | €32.64 Million | €2.67 Million | ▲ +30.4 pp |
| 2017 | 184.9% | €25.26 Million | €13.66 Million | €30.60 Million | €5.35 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2016 | 183.1% | €28.07 Million | €15.33 Million | €34.44 Million | €6.37 Million | ▲ +11.4 pp |
| 2015 | 171.7% | €27.38 Million | €15.94 Million | €36.85 Million | €9.47 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2014 | 170.5% | €24.42 Million | €14.33 Million | €31.19 Million | €6.77 Million | ▲ +19.4 pp |
| 2013 | 151.1% | €22.18 Million | €14.68 Million | €29.72 Million | €7.54 Million | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2012 | 153.9% | €22.63 Million | €14.70 Million | €29.99 Million | €7.35 Million | ▲ +83.6 pp |
| 2011 | 70.4% | €10.63 Million | €15.10 Million | €29.63 Million | €19.01 Million | ▼ -20.2 pp |
| 2010 | 90.5% | €13.39 Million | €14.79 Million | €24.13 Million | €10.74 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2009 | 90.1% | €12.03 Million | €13.35 Million | €21.16 Million | €9.13 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2008 | 89.9% | €11.68 Million | €12.99 Million | €20.62 Million | €8.94 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2007 | 88.7% | €10.92 Million | €12.31 Million | €19.43 Million | €8.51 Million | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2006 | 84.1% | €11.20 Million | €13.32 Million | €20.76 Million | €9.56 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2005 | 84.6% | €11.94 Million | €14.12 Million | €23.95 Million | €12.01 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2004 | 85.3% | €9.90 Million | €11.61 Million | €25.41 Million | €15.51 Million | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2003 | 87.5% | €12.20 Million | €13.94 Million | €40.75 Million | €28.54 Million | ▲ +15.0 pp |
| 2002 | 72.5% | €10.46 Million | €14.42 Million | €62.53 Million | €52.08 Million | ▼ -59.7 pp |
| 2001 | 132.2% | €24.30 Million | €18.38 Million | €57.50 Million | €33.20 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2000 | 132.4% | €22.34 Million | €16.87 Million | €52.70 Million | €30.36 Million | ▲ +16.1 pp |
| 1999 | 116.4% | €18.86 Million | €16.21 Million | €47.49 Million | €28.63 Million | ▲ +31.3 pp |
| 1998 | 85.0% | €8.91 Million | €10.48 Million | €34.40 Million | €25.49 Million | — |