CellaVision AB (CEVI) — Net Asset Quality Index
CellaVision AB (CEVI) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 81.1% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of Skr1.09 Billion minus total liabilities of Skr207.31 Million yields net assets of Skr887.58 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check CEVI asset liquidity ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
CellaVision AB Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2000–2025)
This chart shows how CellaVision AB's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 26 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 81.1%, representing net assets of Skr887.58 Million against total assets of Skr1.09 Billion SEK. See CellaVision AB (CEVI) liquidity to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for CellaVision AB (2000–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for CellaVision AB from 2000 to 2025, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see CellaVision AB market cap and net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (SEK) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 81.1% | Skr887.58 Million | Skr1.09 Billion | Skr207.31 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2024 | 80.6% | Skr815.73 Million | Skr1.01 Billion | Skr196.16 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2023 | 77.1% | Skr716.39 Million | Skr928.71 Million | Skr212.32 Million | ▲ +5.2 pp |
| 2022 | 72.0% | Skr641.63 Million | Skr891.75 Million | Skr250.12 Million | ▲ +6.1 pp |
| 2021 | 65.8% | Skr543.28 Million | Skr825.21 Million | Skr281.93 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2020 | 64.3% | Skr429.62 Million | Skr668.02 Million | Skr238.41 Million | ▲ +10.0 pp |
| 2019 | 54.3% | Skr348.37 Million | Skr641.71 Million | Skr293.34 Million | ▼ -23.6 pp |
| 2018 | 77.9% | Skr290.38 Million | Skr372.78 Million | Skr82.41 Million | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2017 | 80.1% | Skr240.85 Million | Skr300.60 Million | Skr59.75 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2016 | 80.4% | Skr206.18 Million | Skr256.44 Million | Skr50.27 Million | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 2015 | 83.3% | Skr183.52 Million | Skr220.43 Million | Skr36.91 Million | ▲ +8.4 pp |
| 2014 | 74.8% | Skr151.30 Million | Skr202.25 Million | Skr50.95 Million | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2013 | 70.3% | Skr132.52 Million | Skr188.57 Million | Skr56.06 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2012 | 70.0% | Skr124.91 Million | Skr178.56 Million | Skr53.64 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2011 | 70.5% | Skr126.07 Million | Skr178.73 Million | Skr52.66 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2010 | 69.8% | Skr113.42 Million | Skr162.50 Million | Skr49.08 Million | ▲ +3.8 pp |
| 2009 | 66.0% | Skr74.80 Million | Skr113.35 Million | Skr38.55 Million | ▲ +18.3 pp |
| 2008 | 47.7% | Skr45.98 Million | Skr96.47 Million | Skr50.49 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2007 | 45.5% | Skr20.07 Million | Skr44.12 Million | Skr24.05 Million | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2006 | 42.9% | Skr17.73 Million | Skr41.33 Million | Skr23.60 Million | ▼ -14.5 pp |
| 2005 | 57.4% | Skr26.56 Million | Skr46.24 Million | Skr19.68 Million | ▲ +17.2 pp |
| 2004 | 40.2% | Skr18.15 Million | Skr45.12 Million | Skr26.97 Million | ▲ +13.8 pp |
| 2003 | 26.4% | Skr8.07 Million | Skr30.53 Million | Skr22.46 Million | ▼ -39.6 pp |
| 2002 | 66.0% | Skr48.66 Million | Skr73.69 Million | Skr25.02 Million | ▼ -5.6 pp |
| 2001 | 71.6% | Skr82.60 Million | Skr115.35 Million | Skr32.74 Million | ▼ -6.9 pp |
| 2000 | 78.5% | Skr66.67 Million | Skr84.89 Million | Skr18.21 Million | — |