CellaVision AB Tangible Net Worth Ratio
CellaVision AB tangible net worth ratio. CellaVision AB (CEVI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 54.0% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (Skr408.20 Million) from net assets (Skr887.58 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check CellaVision AB PP&E and investment ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of CellaVision AB (2000–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of CellaVision AB from 2000 to 2025. This chart shows how CellaVision AB's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 26 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 54.0%, reflecting net assets of Skr887.58 Million with intangible assets of Skr408.20 Million SEK. See CellaVision AB short-term liquidity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
CellaVision AB Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
CellaVision AB tangible net worth ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for CellaVision AB from 2000 to 2025, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see CellaVision AB (CEVI) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (SEK) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 54.0% | Skr887.58 Million | Skr408.20 Million | Skr1.09 Billion | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2024 | 55.9% | Skr815.73 Million | Skr359.51 Million | Skr1.01 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2023 | 56.8% | Skr716.39 Million | Skr309.44 Million | Skr928.71 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2022 | 57.1% | Skr641.63 Million | Skr275.09 Million | Skr891.75 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2021 | 55.1% | Skr543.28 Million | Skr244.07 Million | Skr825.21 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2020 | 56.0% | Skr429.62 Million | Skr188.91 Million | Skr668.02 Million | ▲ +9.0 pp |
| 2019 | 47.0% | Skr348.37 Million | Skr184.55 Million | Skr641.71 Million | ▼ -29.6 pp |
| 2018 | 76.6% | Skr290.38 Million | Skr67.82 Million | Skr372.78 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2017 | 77.7% | Skr240.85 Million | Skr53.73 Million | Skr300.60 Million | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2016 | 83.2% | Skr206.18 Million | Skr34.72 Million | Skr256.44 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2015 | 84.0% | Skr183.52 Million | Skr29.40 Million | Skr220.43 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2014 | 82.0% | Skr151.30 Million | Skr27.22 Million | Skr202.25 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2013 | 80.0% | Skr132.52 Million | Skr26.47 Million | Skr188.57 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2012 | 80.7% | Skr124.91 Million | Skr24.15 Million | Skr178.56 Million | ▼ -19.3 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | Skr126.07 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr178.73 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | Skr113.42 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr162.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | Skr74.80 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr113.35 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | Skr45.98 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr96.47 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | Skr20.07 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr44.12 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | Skr17.73 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr41.33 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | Skr26.56 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr46.24 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | Skr18.15 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr45.12 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | Skr8.07 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr30.53 Million | ▲ +10.4 pp |
| 2002 | 89.6% | Skr48.66 Million | Skr5.06 Million | Skr73.69 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2001 | 90.5% | Skr82.60 Million | Skr7.82 Million | Skr115.35 Million | ▼ -9.5 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | Skr66.67 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr84.89 Million | — |