CellaVision AB (CEVI) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
CellaVision AB (CEVI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 54.0% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (Skr408.20 Million) from net assets (Skr887.58 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See how liquid is CellaVision AB's working capital to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
CellaVision AB Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2000–2025)
This chart shows how CellaVision AB's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 26 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 54.0%, reflecting net assets of Skr887.58 Million with intangible assets of Skr408.20 Million SEK. See CEVI defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for CellaVision AB (2000–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for CellaVision AB from 2000 to 2025, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see CEVI market cap overview.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (SEK) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 54.0% | Skr887.58 Million | Skr408.20 Million | Skr1.09 Billion | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2024 | 55.9% | Skr815.73 Million | Skr359.51 Million | Skr1.01 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2023 | 56.8% | Skr716.39 Million | Skr309.44 Million | Skr928.71 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2022 | 57.1% | Skr641.63 Million | Skr275.09 Million | Skr891.75 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2021 | 55.1% | Skr543.28 Million | Skr244.07 Million | Skr825.21 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2020 | 56.0% | Skr429.62 Million | Skr188.91 Million | Skr668.02 Million | ▲ +9.0 pp |
| 2019 | 47.0% | Skr348.37 Million | Skr184.55 Million | Skr641.71 Million | ▼ -29.6 pp |
| 2018 | 76.6% | Skr290.38 Million | Skr67.82 Million | Skr372.78 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2017 | 77.7% | Skr240.85 Million | Skr53.73 Million | Skr300.60 Million | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2016 | 83.2% | Skr206.18 Million | Skr34.72 Million | Skr256.44 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2015 | 84.0% | Skr183.52 Million | Skr29.40 Million | Skr220.43 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2014 | 82.0% | Skr151.30 Million | Skr27.22 Million | Skr202.25 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2013 | 80.0% | Skr132.52 Million | Skr26.47 Million | Skr188.57 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2012 | 80.7% | Skr124.91 Million | Skr24.15 Million | Skr178.56 Million | ▼ -19.3 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | Skr126.07 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr178.73 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | Skr113.42 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr162.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | Skr74.80 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr113.35 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | Skr45.98 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr96.47 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | Skr20.07 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr44.12 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | Skr17.73 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr41.33 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | Skr26.56 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr46.24 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | Skr18.15 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr45.12 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | Skr8.07 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr30.53 Million | ▲ +10.4 pp |
| 2002 | 89.6% | Skr48.66 Million | Skr5.06 Million | Skr73.69 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2001 | 90.5% | Skr82.60 Million | Skr7.82 Million | Skr115.35 Million | ▼ -9.5 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | Skr66.67 Million | Skr0.00 | Skr84.89 Million | — |