Bell Copper Corp (BCU) — Net Asset Quality Index
Bell Copper Corp (BCU) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 75.1% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$12.43 Million minus total liabilities of CA$3.09 Million yields net assets of CA$9.33 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Bell Copper Corp (BCU) liquid assets ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Bell Copper Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1998–2024)
This chart shows how Bell Copper Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 27 annual periods from 1998 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 75.1%, representing net assets of CA$9.33 Million against total assets of CA$12.43 Million CAD. See BCU working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Bell Copper Corp (1998–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Bell Copper Corp from 1998 to 2024, covering 27 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market value of Bell Copper Corp.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 78.9% | CA$9.92 Million | CA$12.57 Million | CA$2.65 Million | ▼ -7.5 pp |
| 2023 | 86.4% | CA$9.40 Million | CA$10.87 Million | CA$1.47 Million | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2022 | 94.4% | CA$9.37 Million | CA$9.93 Million | CA$556.31K | ▲ +6.7 pp |
| 2021 | 87.7% | CA$7.05 Million | CA$8.05 Million | CA$993.42K | ▲ +47.0 pp |
| 2020 | 40.7% | CA$2.19 Million | CA$5.38 Million | CA$3.19 Million | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 2019 | 32.6% | CA$1.43 Million | CA$4.38 Million | CA$2.95 Million | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2018 | 31.2% | CA$1.34 Million | CA$4.30 Million | CA$2.96 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2017 | 27.7% | CA$1.20 Million | CA$4.33 Million | CA$3.13 Million | ▲ +21.7 pp |
| 2016 | 6.0% | CA$273.06K | CA$4.55 Million | CA$4.27 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2015 | 4.7% | CA$202.12K | CA$4.26 Million | CA$4.06 Million | ▼ -10.3 pp |
| 2014 | 15.0% | CA$502.25K | CA$3.34 Million | CA$2.84 Million | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 2013 | 29.3% | CA$975.01K | CA$3.33 Million | CA$2.35 Million | ▲ +235.6 pp |
| 2012 | -206.3% | CA$-7.50 Million | CA$3.64 Million | CA$11.14 Million | ▼ -270.6 pp |
| 2011 | 64.3% | CA$36.10 Million | CA$56.15 Million | CA$20.05 Million | ▲ +29.5 pp |
| 2010 | 34.8% | CA$7.32 Million | CA$21.03 Million | CA$13.71 Million | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 2009 | 39.4% | CA$9.53 Million | CA$24.20 Million | CA$14.66 Million | ▼ -6.1 pp |
| 2008 | 45.5% | CA$10.17 Million | CA$22.33 Million | CA$12.16 Million | ▼ -35.2 pp |
| 2007 | 80.7% | CA$11.06 Million | CA$13.70 Million | CA$2.64 Million | ▼ -15.3 pp |
| 2006 | 96.0% | CA$8.47 Million | CA$8.82 Million | CA$350.55K | ▲ +19.8 pp |
| 2005 | 76.2% | CA$3.34 Million | CA$4.39 Million | CA$1.04 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2004 | 77.1% | CA$1.23 Million | CA$1.60 Million | CA$365.50K | ▲ +36.4 pp |
| 2003 | 40.8% | CA$278.06K | CA$682.19K | CA$404.13K | ▲ +17.3 pp |
| 2002 | 23.5% | CA$194.20K | CA$827.52K | CA$633.32K | ▲ +58.9 pp |
| 2001 | -35.5% | CA$-306.67K | CA$864.48K | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -101.5 pp |
| 2000 | 66.0% | CA$528.03K | CA$800.15K | CA$272.12K | ▼ -32.2 pp |
| 1999 | 98.2% | CA$631.16K | CA$642.52K | CA$11.35K | ▲ +9.4 pp |
| 1998 | 88.8% | CA$193.42K | CA$217.73K | CA$24.32K | — |