Ceylon Graphite Corp (CYL) — Net Asset Quality Index
Ceylon Graphite Corp (CYL) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -1.6% as of December 2023. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$4.88 Million minus total liabilities of CA$4.96 Million yields net assets of CA$-76.01K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See CYL cash and liquid assets coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Ceylon Graphite Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2023)
This chart shows how Ceylon Graphite Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 22 annual periods from 2001 to 2023. As of December 2023, the index stands at -1.6%, representing net assets of CA$-76.01K against total assets of CA$4.88 Million CAD. Explore cash flow conversion of Ceylon Graphite Corp to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Ceylon Graphite Corp (2001–2023)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Ceylon Graphite Corp from 2001 to 2023, covering 22 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see CYL market cap overview.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 11.0% | CA$523.15K | CA$4.77 Million | CA$4.25 Million | ▲ +7.5 pp |
| 2022 | 3.5% | CA$140.01K | CA$3.99 Million | CA$3.85 Million | ▼ -34.6 pp |
| 2021 | 38.1% | CA$2.17 Million | CA$5.70 Million | CA$3.53 Million | ▲ +32.2 pp |
| 2020 | 5.9% | CA$237.45K | CA$4.05 Million | CA$3.81 Million | ▼ -15.2 pp |
| 2019 | 21.0% | CA$809.05K | CA$3.85 Million | CA$3.04 Million | ▼ -31.9 pp |
| 2018 | 53.0% | CA$1.69 Million | CA$3.18 Million | CA$1.50 Million | ▼ -5.8 pp |
| 2017 | 58.7% | CA$2.29 Million | CA$3.89 Million | CA$1.61 Million | ▲ +36.3 pp |
| 2016 | 22.5% | CA$234.09K | CA$1.04 Million | CA$807.12K | ▲ +2073.9 pp |
| 2015 | -2051.5% | CA$-374.15K | CA$18.24K | CA$392.38K | ▼ -2109.8 pp |
| 2014 | 58.3% | CA$114.49K | CA$196.31K | CA$81.82K | ▼ -12.8 pp |
| 2013 | 71.1% | CA$175.40K | CA$246.54K | CA$71.14K | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2012 | 66.6% | CA$328.05K | CA$492.74K | CA$164.70K | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2011 | 60.0% | CA$460.33K | CA$767.05K | CA$306.71K | ▼ -35.0 pp |
| 2009 | 95.0% | CA$8.97 Million | CA$9.44 Million | CA$467.49K | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2008 | 92.5% | CA$10.10 Million | CA$10.92 Million | CA$822.28K | ▼ -4.7 pp |
| 2007 | 97.2% | CA$480.93K | CA$494.90K | CA$13.97K | ▲ +14825.1 pp |
| 2006 | -14728.0% | CA$-372.91K | CA$2.53K | CA$375.44K | ▲ +19651.5 pp |
| 2005 | -34379.5% | CA$-336.57K | CA$979.00 | CA$337.55K | ▲ +90236.0 pp |
| 2004 | -124615.4% | CA$-306.55K | CA$246.00 | CA$306.80K | ▼ -109834.9 pp |
| 2003 | -14780.6% | CA$-293.99K | CA$1.99K | CA$295.98K | ▼ -8221.7 pp |
| 2002 | -6558.9% | CA$-268.06K | CA$4.09K | CA$272.15K | ▼ -5970.6 pp |
| 2001 | -588.2% | CA$-236.85K | CA$40.27K | CA$277.12K | — |