Ceylon Graphite Corp Net Asset Quality Index
Ceylon Graphite Corp net asset quality index. Ceylon Graphite Corp (CYL) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -1.6% as of December 2023. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$4.88 Million minus total liabilities of CA$4.96 Million yields net assets of CA$-76.01K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Ceylon Graphite Corp (CYL) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Ceylon Graphite Corp (2001–2023)
Net asset quality index of Ceylon Graphite Corp from 2001 to 2023. This chart shows how Ceylon Graphite Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 22 annual periods from 2001 to 2023. As of December 2023, the index stands at -1.6%, representing net assets of CA$-76.01K against total assets of CA$4.88 Million CAD. See CYL total equity for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Ceylon Graphite Corp Net Asset Quality Index by Year (2001–2023)
Ceylon Graphite Corp net asset quality index by year from 2001 to 2023. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Ceylon Graphite Corp from 2001 to 2023, covering 22 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Ceylon Graphite Corp market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 11.0% | CA$523.15K | CA$4.77 Million | CA$4.25 Million | ▲ +7.5 pp |
| 2022 | 3.5% | CA$140.01K | CA$3.99 Million | CA$3.85 Million | ▼ -34.6 pp |
| 2021 | 38.1% | CA$2.17 Million | CA$5.70 Million | CA$3.53 Million | ▲ +32.2 pp |
| 2020 | 5.9% | CA$237.45K | CA$4.05 Million | CA$3.81 Million | ▼ -15.2 pp |
| 2019 | 21.0% | CA$809.05K | CA$3.85 Million | CA$3.04 Million | ▼ -31.9 pp |
| 2018 | 53.0% | CA$1.69 Million | CA$3.18 Million | CA$1.50 Million | ▼ -5.8 pp |
| 2017 | 58.7% | CA$2.29 Million | CA$3.89 Million | CA$1.61 Million | ▲ +36.3 pp |
| 2016 | 22.5% | CA$234.09K | CA$1.04 Million | CA$807.12K | ▲ +2073.9 pp |
| 2015 | -2051.5% | CA$-374.15K | CA$18.24K | CA$392.38K | ▼ -2109.8 pp |
| 2014 | 58.3% | CA$114.49K | CA$196.31K | CA$81.82K | ▼ -12.8 pp |
| 2013 | 71.1% | CA$175.40K | CA$246.54K | CA$71.14K | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2012 | 66.6% | CA$328.05K | CA$492.74K | CA$164.70K | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2011 | 60.0% | CA$460.33K | CA$767.05K | CA$306.71K | ▼ -35.0 pp |
| 2009 | 95.0% | CA$8.97 Million | CA$9.44 Million | CA$467.49K | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2008 | 92.5% | CA$10.10 Million | CA$10.92 Million | CA$822.28K | ▼ -4.7 pp |
| 2007 | 97.2% | CA$480.93K | CA$494.90K | CA$13.97K | ▲ +14825.1 pp |
| 2006 | -14728.0% | CA$-372.91K | CA$2.53K | CA$375.44K | ▲ +19651.5 pp |
| 2005 | -34379.5% | CA$-336.57K | CA$979.00 | CA$337.55K | ▲ +90236.0 pp |
| 2004 | -124615.4% | CA$-306.55K | CA$246.00 | CA$306.80K | ▼ -109834.9 pp |
| 2003 | -14780.6% | CA$-293.99K | CA$1.99K | CA$295.98K | ▼ -8221.7 pp |
| 2002 | -6558.9% | CA$-268.06K | CA$4.09K | CA$272.15K | ▼ -5970.6 pp |
| 2001 | -588.2% | CA$-236.85K | CA$40.27K | CA$277.12K | — |