Ceylon Graphite Corp (CYL) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Ceylon Graphite Corp (CYL) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 5897.8% as of December 2023. Working capital of CA$-4.48 Million (current assets of CA$382.06K minus current liabilities of CA$4.87 Million) is measured against net assets of CA$-76.01K. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See Ceylon Graphite Corp balance sheet independence to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Ceylon Graphite Corp Working Capital to Net Assets (2001–2023)
This chart shows how Ceylon Graphite Corp's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 22 annual periods from 2001 to 2023. As of December 2023, the ratio stands at 5897.8%, reflecting working capital of CA$-4.48 Million against net assets of CA$-76.01K CAD. Check Ceylon Graphite Corp (CYL) tangible net worth to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Ceylon Graphite Corp (2001–2023)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Ceylon Graphite Corp from 2001 to 2023, covering 22 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see CYL market cap overview.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | -710.1% | CA$-3.72 Million | CA$523.15K | CA$420.73K | CA$4.14 Million | ▲ +1725.0 pp |
| 2022 | -2435.1% | CA$-3.41 Million | CA$140.01K | CA$421.33K | CA$3.83 Million | ▼ -2373.3 pp |
| 2021 | -61.8% | CA$-1.34 Million | CA$2.17 Million | CA$2.18 Million | CA$3.52 Million | ▲ +560.8 pp |
| 2020 | -622.6% | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$237.45K | CA$388.17K | CA$1.87 Million | ▼ -530.9 pp |
| 2019 | -91.6% | CA$-741.28K | CA$809.05K | CA$672.73K | CA$1.41 Million | ▼ -16.2 pp |
| 2018 | -75.4% | CA$-1.27 Million | CA$1.69 Million | CA$209.26K | CA$1.48 Million | ▼ -57.6 pp |
| 2017 | -17.8% | CA$-407.85K | CA$2.29 Million | CA$1.20 Million | CA$1.61 Million | ▼ -117.8 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | CA$234.09K | CA$234.09K | CA$1.04 Million | CA$807.12K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$-374.15K | CA$-374.15K | CA$18.24K | CA$392.38K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$114.49K | CA$114.49K | CA$196.31K | CA$81.82K | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2013 | 97.5% | CA$171.06K | CA$175.40K | CA$242.19K | CA$71.14K | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2012 | 96.8% | CA$317.40K | CA$328.05K | CA$482.10K | CA$164.70K | ▲ +25.4 pp |
| 2011 | 71.4% | CA$328.64K | CA$460.33K | CA$635.35K | CA$306.71K | ▲ +52.1 pp |
| 2009 | 19.3% | CA$1.73 Million | CA$8.97 Million | CA$2.15 Million | CA$424.28K | ▼ -64.4 pp |
| 2008 | 83.7% | CA$8.45 Million | CA$10.10 Million | CA$8.78 Million | CA$334.06K | ▼ -16.3 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$480.93K | CA$480.93K | CA$494.90K | CA$13.97K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | CA$-372.91K | CA$-372.91K | CA$2.53K | CA$375.44K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$-336.57K | CA$-336.57K | CA$979.00 | CA$337.55K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$-306.55K | CA$-306.55K | CA$246.00 | CA$306.80K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$-293.99K | CA$-293.99K | CA$1.99K | CA$295.98K | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2002 | 100.7% | CA$-270.02K | CA$-268.06K | CA$2.13K | CA$272.15K | ▼ -11.1 pp |
| 2001 | 111.8% | CA$-264.83K | CA$-236.85K | CA$12.29K | CA$277.12K | — |