Kiplin Metals Inc (KIP) — Net Asset Quality Index
Kiplin Metals Inc (KIP) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 99.7% as of June 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$1.40 Million minus total liabilities of CA$4.39K yields net assets of CA$1.39 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Kiplin Metals Inc liquid asset ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Kiplin Metals Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2024)
This chart shows how Kiplin Metals Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2001 to 2024. As of June 2025, the index stands at 99.7%, representing net assets of CA$1.39 Million against total assets of CA$1.40 Million CAD. See KIP working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Kiplin Metals Inc (2001–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Kiplin Metals Inc from 2001 to 2024, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Kiplin Metals Inc (KIP) total market value.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 99.0% | CA$1.48 Million | CA$1.50 Million | CA$15.65K | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2023 | 94.1% | CA$1.68 Million | CA$1.78 Million | CA$105.71K | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2022 | 89.1% | CA$112.84K | CA$126.61K | CA$13.77K | ▲ +50.7 pp |
| 2021 | 38.5% | CA$107.45K | CA$279.32K | CA$171.86K | ▼ -43.2 pp |
| 2020 | 81.6% | CA$502.21K | CA$615.12K | CA$112.91K | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2019 | 77.8% | CA$1.37 Million | CA$1.76 Million | CA$390.69K | ▼ -7.8 pp |
| 2018 | 85.6% | CA$1.52 Million | CA$1.78 Million | CA$257.30K | ▼ -10.9 pp |
| 2017 | 96.4% | CA$1.82 Million | CA$1.89 Million | CA$67.27K | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2016 | 97.7% | CA$3.59 Million | CA$3.67 Million | CA$84.28K | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2015 | 91.9% | CA$4.05 Million | CA$4.40 Million | CA$357.01K | ▲ +42.2 pp |
| 2014 | 49.7% | CA$786.21K | CA$1.58 Million | CA$795.93K | ▲ +548.0 pp |
| 2013 | -498.3% | CA$-63.87K | CA$12.82K | CA$76.69K | ▲ +125.9 pp |
| 2012 | -624.2% | CA$-707.99K | CA$113.43K | CA$821.42K | ▼ -234.3 pp |
| 2011 | -389.9% | CA$-459.88K | CA$117.94K | CA$577.82K | ▼ -249.6 pp |
| 2010 | -140.3% | CA$-180.85K | CA$128.91K | CA$309.76K | ▼ -234.9 pp |
| 2009 | 94.6% | CA$1.40 Million | CA$1.48 Million | CA$80.04K | ▲ +10.4 pp |
| 2008 | 84.2% | CA$511.24K | CA$607.24K | CA$96.00K | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2007 | 83.9% | CA$387.41K | CA$461.50K | CA$74.10K | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2006 | 79.0% | CA$265.31K | CA$335.71K | CA$70.41K | ▲ +109.0 pp |
| 2005 | -29.9% | CA$-57.44K | CA$191.86K | CA$249.31K | ▲ +5846.5 pp |
| 2004 | -5876.4% | CA$-282.42K | CA$4.81K | CA$287.23K | ▼ -4307.9 pp |
| 2003 | -1568.5% | CA$-217.24K | CA$13.85K | CA$231.09K | ▼ -1188.8 pp |
| 2002 | -379.8% | CA$-154.91K | CA$40.79K | CA$195.70K | ▲ +1419.4 pp |
| 2001 | -1799.2% | CA$-184.24K | CA$10.24K | CA$194.48K | — |