Kiplin Metals Inc Net Asset Quality Index
Kiplin Metals Inc net asset quality index. Kiplin Metals Inc (KIP) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 95.5% as of June 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$1.96 Million minus total liabilities of CA$87.27K yields net assets of CA$1.87 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See what is Kiplin Metals Inc's book value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Kiplin Metals Inc (2001–2025)
Net asset quality index of Kiplin Metals Inc from 2001 to 2025. This chart shows how Kiplin Metals Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 25 annual periods from 2001 to 2025. As of June 2026, the index stands at 95.5%, representing net assets of CA$1.87 Million against total assets of CA$1.96 Million CAD. Check Kiplin Metals Inc (KIP) strategic investment index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Kiplin Metals Inc Net Asset Quality Index by Year (2001–2025)
Kiplin Metals Inc net asset quality index by year from 2001 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Kiplin Metals Inc from 2001 to 2025, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see KIP stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 98.3% | CA$1.60 Million | CA$1.62 Million | CA$26.96K | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2024 | 99.0% | CA$1.48 Million | CA$1.50 Million | CA$15.65K | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2023 | 94.1% | CA$1.68 Million | CA$1.78 Million | CA$105.71K | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2022 | 89.1% | CA$112.84K | CA$126.61K | CA$13.77K | ▲ +50.7 pp |
| 2021 | 38.5% | CA$107.45K | CA$279.32K | CA$171.86K | ▼ -43.2 pp |
| 2020 | 81.6% | CA$502.21K | CA$615.12K | CA$112.91K | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2019 | 77.8% | CA$1.37 Million | CA$1.76 Million | CA$390.69K | ▼ -7.8 pp |
| 2018 | 85.6% | CA$1.52 Million | CA$1.78 Million | CA$257.30K | ▼ -10.9 pp |
| 2017 | 96.4% | CA$1.82 Million | CA$1.89 Million | CA$67.27K | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2016 | 97.7% | CA$3.59 Million | CA$3.67 Million | CA$84.28K | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2015 | 91.9% | CA$4.05 Million | CA$4.40 Million | CA$357.01K | ▲ +42.2 pp |
| 2014 | 49.7% | CA$786.21K | CA$1.58 Million | CA$795.93K | ▲ +548.0 pp |
| 2013 | -498.3% | CA$-63.87K | CA$12.82K | CA$76.69K | ▲ +125.9 pp |
| 2012 | -624.2% | CA$-707.99K | CA$113.43K | CA$821.42K | ▼ -234.3 pp |
| 2011 | -389.9% | CA$-459.88K | CA$117.94K | CA$577.82K | ▼ -249.6 pp |
| 2010 | -140.3% | CA$-180.85K | CA$128.91K | CA$309.76K | ▼ -234.9 pp |
| 2009 | 94.6% | CA$1.40 Million | CA$1.48 Million | CA$80.04K | ▲ +10.4 pp |
| 2008 | 84.2% | CA$511.24K | CA$607.24K | CA$96.00K | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2007 | 83.9% | CA$387.41K | CA$461.50K | CA$74.10K | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2006 | 79.0% | CA$265.31K | CA$335.71K | CA$70.41K | ▲ +109.0 pp |
| 2005 | -29.9% | CA$-57.44K | CA$191.86K | CA$249.31K | ▲ +5846.5 pp |
| 2004 | -5876.4% | CA$-282.42K | CA$4.81K | CA$287.23K | ▼ -4307.9 pp |
| 2003 | -1568.5% | CA$-217.24K | CA$13.85K | CA$231.09K | ▼ -1188.8 pp |
| 2002 | -379.8% | CA$-154.91K | CA$40.79K | CA$195.70K | ▲ +1419.4 pp |
| 2001 | -1799.2% | CA$-184.24K | CA$10.24K | CA$194.48K | — |