Kiplin Metals Inc (KIP) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Kiplin Metals Inc (KIP) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 63.4% as of June 2025. Working capital of CA$881.49K (current assets of CA$885.89K minus current liabilities of CA$4.39K) is measured against net assets of CA$1.39 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See Kiplin Metals Inc (KIP) balance sheet quality index to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Kiplin Metals Inc Working Capital to Net Assets (2001–2024)
This chart shows how Kiplin Metals Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2001 to 2024. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at 63.4%, reflecting working capital of CA$881.49K against net assets of CA$1.39 Million CAD. Check KIP goodwill-adjusted equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Kiplin Metals Inc (2001–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Kiplin Metals Inc from 2001 to 2024, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see KIP market cap.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 65.9% | CA$978.13K | CA$1.48 Million | CA$993.78K | CA$15.65K | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2023 | 69.8% | CA$1.17 Million | CA$1.68 Million | CA$1.28 Million | CA$105.71K | ▲ +34.7 pp |
| 2022 | 35.2% | CA$39.71K | CA$112.84K | CA$53.48K | CA$13.77K | ▲ +13.3 pp |
| 2021 | 21.9% | CA$23.48K | CA$107.45K | CA$195.35K | CA$171.86K | ▼ -77.8 pp |
| 2020 | 99.6% | CA$500.39K | CA$502.21K | CA$613.29K | CA$112.91K | ▲ +127.5 pp |
| 2019 | -27.8% | CA$-380.53K | CA$1.37 Million | CA$10.16K | CA$390.69K | ▼ -13.1 pp |
| 2018 | -14.8% | CA$-224.81K | CA$1.52 Million | CA$32.49K | CA$257.30K | ▼ -17.7 pp |
| 2017 | 3.0% | CA$53.93K | CA$1.82 Million | CA$121.20K | CA$67.27K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2016 | 3.1% | CA$110.75K | CA$3.59 Million | CA$195.03K | CA$84.28K | ▼ -17.4 pp |
| 2015 | 20.5% | CA$827.80K | CA$4.05 Million | CA$1.18 Million | CA$357.01K | ▼ -67.6 pp |
| 2014 | 88.1% | CA$692.49K | CA$786.21K | CA$1.10 Million | CA$410.93K | ▼ -27.6 pp |
| 2013 | 115.7% | CA$-73.87K | CA$-63.87K | CA$2.82K | CA$76.69K | ▲ +6.5 pp |
| 2012 | 109.2% | CA$-772.99K | CA$-707.99K | CA$48.43K | CA$821.42K | ▼ -12.6 pp |
| 2011 | 121.8% | CA$-560.12K | CA$-459.88K | CA$17.70K | CA$577.82K | ▼ -33.7 pp |
| 2010 | 155.5% | CA$-281.16K | CA$-180.85K | CA$28.61K | CA$309.76K | ▲ +62.7 pp |
| 2009 | 92.8% | CA$1.30 Million | CA$1.40 Million | CA$1.38 Million | CA$80.04K | ▲ +12.5 pp |
| 2008 | 80.3% | CA$410.77K | CA$511.24K | CA$506.77K | CA$96.00K | ▲ +6.3 pp |
| 2007 | 74.0% | CA$286.82K | CA$387.41K | CA$360.91K | CA$74.10K | ▼ -25.7 pp |
| 2006 | 99.7% | CA$264.57K | CA$265.31K | CA$334.97K | CA$70.41K | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2005 | 101.6% | CA$-58.37K | CA$-57.44K | CA$190.94K | CA$249.31K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2004 | 100.4% | CA$-283.57K | CA$-282.42K | CA$3.65K | CA$287.23K | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2003 | 100.7% | CA$-218.68K | CA$-217.24K | CA$12.41K | CA$231.09K | ▼ -16.6 pp |
| 2002 | 117.3% | CA$-181.71K | CA$-154.91K | CA$13.99K | CA$195.70K | ▲ +17.3 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | CA$-184.24K | CA$-184.24K | CA$10.24K | CA$194.48K | — |