Kiplin Metals Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Kiplin Metals Inc working capital to net assets ratio. Kiplin Metals Inc (KIP) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 40.4% as of June 2026. Working capital of CA$754.84K (current assets of CA$842.11K minus current liabilities of CA$87.27K) is measured against net assets of CA$1.87 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check Kiplin Metals Inc (KIP) tangible equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Kiplin Metals Inc (2001–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Kiplin Metals Inc from 2001 to 2025. This chart shows how Kiplin Metals Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 25 annual periods from 2001 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 40.4%, reflecting working capital of CA$754.84K against net assets of CA$1.87 Million CAD. See how many days can Kiplin Metals Inc fund operations to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Kiplin Metals Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Kiplin Metals Inc working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Kiplin Metals Inc from 2001 to 2025, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see KIP asset base.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 63.1% | CA$1.01 Million | CA$1.60 Million | CA$1.03 Million | CA$26.96K | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2024 | 65.9% | CA$978.13K | CA$1.48 Million | CA$993.78K | CA$15.65K | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2023 | 69.8% | CA$1.17 Million | CA$1.68 Million | CA$1.28 Million | CA$105.71K | ▲ +34.7 pp |
| 2022 | 35.2% | CA$39.71K | CA$112.84K | CA$53.48K | CA$13.77K | ▲ +13.3 pp |
| 2021 | 21.9% | CA$23.48K | CA$107.45K | CA$195.35K | CA$171.86K | ▼ -77.8 pp |
| 2020 | 99.6% | CA$500.39K | CA$502.21K | CA$613.29K | CA$112.91K | ▲ +127.5 pp |
| 2019 | -27.8% | CA$-380.53K | CA$1.37 Million | CA$10.16K | CA$390.69K | ▼ -13.1 pp |
| 2018 | -14.8% | CA$-224.81K | CA$1.52 Million | CA$32.49K | CA$257.30K | ▼ -17.7 pp |
| 2017 | 3.0% | CA$53.93K | CA$1.82 Million | CA$121.20K | CA$67.27K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2016 | 3.1% | CA$110.75K | CA$3.59 Million | CA$195.03K | CA$84.28K | ▼ -17.4 pp |
| 2015 | 20.5% | CA$827.80K | CA$4.05 Million | CA$1.18 Million | CA$357.01K | ▼ -67.6 pp |
| 2014 | 88.1% | CA$692.49K | CA$786.21K | CA$1.10 Million | CA$410.93K | ▼ -27.6 pp |
| 2013 | 115.7% | CA$-73.87K | CA$-63.87K | CA$2.82K | CA$76.69K | ▲ +6.5 pp |
| 2012 | 109.2% | CA$-772.99K | CA$-707.99K | CA$48.43K | CA$821.42K | ▼ -12.6 pp |
| 2011 | 121.8% | CA$-560.12K | CA$-459.88K | CA$17.70K | CA$577.82K | ▼ -33.7 pp |
| 2010 | 155.5% | CA$-281.16K | CA$-180.85K | CA$28.61K | CA$309.76K | ▲ +62.7 pp |
| 2009 | 92.8% | CA$1.30 Million | CA$1.40 Million | CA$1.38 Million | CA$80.04K | ▲ +12.5 pp |
| 2008 | 80.3% | CA$410.77K | CA$511.24K | CA$506.77K | CA$96.00K | ▲ +6.3 pp |
| 2007 | 74.0% | CA$286.82K | CA$387.41K | CA$360.91K | CA$74.10K | ▼ -25.7 pp |
| 2006 | 99.7% | CA$264.57K | CA$265.31K | CA$334.97K | CA$70.41K | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2005 | 101.6% | CA$-58.37K | CA$-57.44K | CA$190.94K | CA$249.31K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2004 | 100.4% | CA$-283.57K | CA$-282.42K | CA$3.65K | CA$287.23K | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2003 | 100.7% | CA$-218.68K | CA$-217.24K | CA$12.41K | CA$231.09K | ▼ -16.6 pp |
| 2002 | 117.3% | CA$-181.71K | CA$-154.91K | CA$13.99K | CA$195.70K | ▲ +17.3 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | CA$-184.24K | CA$-184.24K | CA$10.24K | CA$194.48K | — |