Roadman Investments Corp Net Asset Quality Index
Roadman Investments Corp net asset quality index. Roadman Investments Corp (LITT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 66.8% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$2.85 Million minus total liabilities of CA$945.34K yields net assets of CA$1.90 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Roadman Investments Corp cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Roadman Investments Corp (2008–2025)
Net asset quality index of Roadman Investments Corp from 2008 to 2025. This chart shows how Roadman Investments Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 66.8%, representing net assets of CA$1.90 Million against total assets of CA$2.85 Million CAD. See shareholders equity of Roadman Investments Corp for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Roadman Investments Corp Net Asset Quality Index by Year (2008–2025)
Roadman Investments Corp net asset quality index by year from 2008 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Roadman Investments Corp from 2008 to 2025, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Roadman Investments Corp.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 81.8% | CA$3.54 Million | CA$4.33 Million | CA$789.61K | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2024 | 86.6% | CA$5.12 Million | CA$5.91 Million | CA$790.12K | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 2023 | 91.5% | CA$6.89 Million | CA$7.52 Million | CA$639.70K | ▲ +92.8 pp |
| 2022 | -1.3% | CA$-10.73K | CA$818.64K | CA$829.37K | ▼ -86.8 pp |
| 2021 | 85.5% | CA$2.50 Million | CA$2.92 Million | CA$423.12K | ▲ +126.7 pp |
| 2020 | -41.2% | CA$-140.66K | CA$341.74K | CA$482.40K | ▼ -87.3 pp |
| 2019 | 46.2% | CA$350.66K | CA$759.53K | CA$408.88K | ▲ +148.6 pp |
| 2018 | -102.5% | CA$-362.46K | CA$353.74K | CA$716.20K | ▲ +109.0 pp |
| 2017 | -211.4% | CA$-495.75K | CA$234.47K | CA$730.23K | ▼ -230.3 pp |
| 2016 | 18.8% | CA$147.05K | CA$780.32K | CA$633.28K | ▼ -74.2 pp |
| 2015 | 93.0% | CA$744.48K | CA$800.16K | CA$55.68K | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2014 | 95.5% | CA$1.36 Million | CA$1.42 Million | CA$64.36K | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2013 | 97.6% | CA$1.21 Million | CA$1.24 Million | CA$29.43K | ▲ +16.8 pp |
| 2012 | 80.8% | CA$1.28 Million | CA$1.58 Million | CA$303.06K | ▼ -7.8 pp |
| 2011 | 88.6% | CA$2.56 Million | CA$2.89 Million | CA$330.13K | ▼ -5.3 pp |
| 2010 | 93.9% | CA$4.61 Million | CA$4.91 Million | CA$301.52K | ▲ +18.5 pp |
| 2009 | 75.4% | CA$176.00K | CA$233.56K | CA$57.56K | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2008 | 89.2% | CA$270.98K | CA$303.79K | CA$32.81K | — |