Roadman Investments Corp (LITT) — Net Asset Quality Index
Roadman Investments Corp (LITT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 58.1% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$4.66 Million minus total liabilities of CA$1.95 Million yields net assets of CA$2.71 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check LITT cash and liquid asset ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Roadman Investments Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2008–2025)
This chart shows how Roadman Investments Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of September 2025, the index stands at 58.1%, representing net assets of CA$2.71 Million against total assets of CA$4.66 Million CAD. See LITT current assets to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Roadman Investments Corp (2008–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Roadman Investments Corp from 2008 to 2025, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see LITT company net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 81.8% | CA$3.54 Million | CA$4.33 Million | CA$789.61K | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2024 | 86.6% | CA$5.12 Million | CA$5.91 Million | CA$790.12K | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 2023 | 91.5% | CA$6.89 Million | CA$7.52 Million | CA$639.70K | ▲ +92.8 pp |
| 2022 | -1.3% | CA$-10.73K | CA$818.64K | CA$829.37K | ▼ -86.8 pp |
| 2021 | 85.5% | CA$2.50 Million | CA$2.92 Million | CA$423.12K | ▲ +126.7 pp |
| 2020 | -41.2% | CA$-140.66K | CA$341.74K | CA$482.40K | ▼ -87.3 pp |
| 2019 | 46.2% | CA$350.66K | CA$759.53K | CA$408.88K | ▲ +148.6 pp |
| 2018 | -102.5% | CA$-362.46K | CA$353.74K | CA$716.20K | ▲ +109.0 pp |
| 2017 | -211.4% | CA$-495.75K | CA$234.47K | CA$730.23K | ▼ -230.3 pp |
| 2016 | 18.8% | CA$147.05K | CA$780.32K | CA$633.28K | ▼ -74.2 pp |
| 2015 | 93.0% | CA$744.48K | CA$800.16K | CA$55.68K | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2014 | 95.5% | CA$1.36 Million | CA$1.42 Million | CA$64.36K | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2013 | 97.6% | CA$1.21 Million | CA$1.24 Million | CA$29.43K | ▲ +16.8 pp |
| 2012 | 80.8% | CA$1.28 Million | CA$1.58 Million | CA$303.06K | ▼ -7.8 pp |
| 2011 | 88.6% | CA$2.56 Million | CA$2.89 Million | CA$330.13K | ▼ -5.3 pp |
| 2010 | 93.9% | CA$4.61 Million | CA$4.91 Million | CA$301.52K | ▲ +18.5 pp |
| 2009 | 75.4% | CA$176.00K | CA$233.56K | CA$57.56K | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2008 | 89.2% | CA$270.98K | CA$303.79K | CA$32.81K | — |