Roadman Investments Corp (LITT) — Net Asset Quality Index
Roadman Investments Corp (LITT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 66.8% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$2.85 Million minus total liabilities of CA$945.34K yields net assets of CA$1.90 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read Roadman Investments Corp debt and liabilities for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Roadman Investments Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2008–2025)
This chart shows how Roadman Investments Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 66.8%, representing net assets of CA$1.90 Million against total assets of CA$2.85 Million CAD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see LITT market cap.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Roadman Investments Corp (2008–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Roadman Investments Corp from 2008 to 2025, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check Roadman Investments Corp (LITT) strategic investment index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 81.8% | CA$3.54 Million | CA$4.33 Million | CA$789.61K | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2024 | 86.6% | CA$5.12 Million | CA$5.91 Million | CA$790.12K | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 2023 | 91.5% | CA$6.89 Million | CA$7.52 Million | CA$639.70K | ▲ +92.8 pp |
| 2022 | -1.3% | CA$-10.73K | CA$818.64K | CA$829.37K | ▼ -86.8 pp |
| 2021 | 85.5% | CA$2.50 Million | CA$2.92 Million | CA$423.12K | ▲ +126.7 pp |
| 2020 | -41.2% | CA$-140.66K | CA$341.74K | CA$482.40K | ▼ -87.3 pp |
| 2019 | 46.2% | CA$350.66K | CA$759.53K | CA$408.88K | ▲ +148.6 pp |
| 2018 | -102.5% | CA$-362.46K | CA$353.74K | CA$716.20K | ▲ +109.0 pp |
| 2017 | -211.4% | CA$-495.75K | CA$234.47K | CA$730.23K | ▼ -230.3 pp |
| 2016 | 18.8% | CA$147.05K | CA$780.32K | CA$633.28K | ▼ -74.2 pp |
| 2015 | 93.0% | CA$744.48K | CA$800.16K | CA$55.68K | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2014 | 95.5% | CA$1.36 Million | CA$1.42 Million | CA$64.36K | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2013 | 97.6% | CA$1.21 Million | CA$1.24 Million | CA$29.43K | ▲ +16.8 pp |
| 2012 | 80.8% | CA$1.28 Million | CA$1.58 Million | CA$303.06K | ▼ -7.8 pp |
| 2011 | 88.6% | CA$2.56 Million | CA$2.89 Million | CA$330.13K | ▼ -5.3 pp |
| 2010 | 93.9% | CA$4.61 Million | CA$4.91 Million | CA$301.52K | ▲ +18.5 pp |
| 2009 | 75.4% | CA$176.00K | CA$233.56K | CA$57.56K | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2008 | 89.2% | CA$270.98K | CA$303.79K | CA$32.81K | — |