Roadman Investments Corp Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Roadman Investments Corp working capital to net assets ratio. Roadman Investments Corp (LITT) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 85.8% as of March 2026. Working capital of CA$1.63 Million (current assets of CA$2.58 Million minus current liabilities of CA$945.34K) is measured against net assets of CA$1.90 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check Roadman Investments Corp tangible equity quality to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Roadman Investments Corp (2008–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Roadman Investments Corp from 2008 to 2025. This chart shows how Roadman Investments Corp's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 85.8%, reflecting working capital of CA$1.63 Million against net assets of CA$1.90 Million CAD. See LITT defensive asset coverage days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Roadman Investments Corp Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2008–2025)
Roadman Investments Corp working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2008 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Roadman Investments Corp from 2008 to 2025, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Roadman Investments Corp total assets.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.4% | CA$3.52 Million | CA$3.54 Million | CA$4.31 Million | CA$789.61K | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2024 | 93.6% | CA$4.79 Million | CA$5.12 Million | CA$5.58 Million | CA$790.12K | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2023 | 95.7% | CA$6.59 Million | CA$6.89 Million | CA$7.23 Million | CA$639.70K | ▼ -2893.7 pp |
| 2022 | 2989.4% | CA$-320.73K | CA$-10.73K | CA$508.64K | CA$829.37K | ▲ +2896.1 pp |
| 2021 | 93.3% | CA$2.33 Million | CA$2.50 Million | CA$2.76 Million | CA$423.12K | ▼ -74.6 pp |
| 2020 | 167.9% | CA$-236.11K | CA$-140.66K | CA$246.29K | CA$482.40K | ▲ +145.6 pp |
| 2019 | 22.3% | CA$78.19K | CA$350.66K | CA$487.06K | CA$408.88K | ▼ -90.8 pp |
| 2018 | 113.1% | CA$-410.04K | CA$-362.46K | CA$306.15K | CA$716.20K | ▼ -11.7 pp |
| 2017 | 124.8% | CA$-618.83K | CA$-495.75K | CA$111.40K | CA$730.23K | ▲ +276.5 pp |
| 2016 | -151.7% | CA$-223.00K | CA$147.05K | CA$410.28K | CA$633.28K | ▼ -197.9 pp |
| 2015 | 46.2% | CA$344.24K | CA$744.48K | CA$399.92K | CA$55.68K | ▼ -50.4 pp |
| 2014 | 96.6% | CA$1.31 Million | CA$1.36 Million | CA$1.38 Million | CA$64.36K | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2013 | 98.7% | CA$1.19 Million | CA$1.21 Million | CA$1.22 Million | CA$29.43K | ▲ +72.2 pp |
| 2012 | 26.5% | CA$338.05K | CA$1.28 Million | CA$641.10K | CA$303.06K | ▲ +14.3 pp |
| 2011 | 12.2% | CA$311.53K | CA$2.56 Million | CA$641.66K | CA$330.13K | ▼ -17.1 pp |
| 2010 | 29.3% | CA$1.35 Million | CA$4.61 Million | CA$1.65 Million | CA$301.52K | ▼ -70.7 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$176.00K | CA$176.00K | CA$233.56K | CA$57.56K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$270.98K | CA$270.98K | CA$303.79K | CA$32.81K | — |