Roadman Investments Corp (LITT) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Roadman Investments Corp (LITT) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 77.1% as of September 2025. Working capital of CA$2.09 Million (current assets of CA$4.04 Million minus current liabilities of CA$1.95 Million) is measured against net assets of CA$2.71 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See Roadman Investments Corp balance sheet independence to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Roadman Investments Corp Working Capital to Net Assets (2008–2025)
This chart shows how Roadman Investments Corp's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 77.1%, reflecting working capital of CA$2.09 Million against net assets of CA$2.71 Million CAD. Check LITT intangible-adjusted equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Roadman Investments Corp (2008–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Roadman Investments Corp from 2008 to 2025, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see LITT market cap.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.4% | CA$3.52 Million | CA$3.54 Million | CA$4.31 Million | CA$789.61K | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2024 | 93.6% | CA$4.79 Million | CA$5.12 Million | CA$5.58 Million | CA$790.12K | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2023 | 95.7% | CA$6.59 Million | CA$6.89 Million | CA$7.23 Million | CA$639.70K | ▼ -2893.7 pp |
| 2022 | 2989.4% | CA$-320.73K | CA$-10.73K | CA$508.64K | CA$829.37K | ▲ +2896.1 pp |
| 2021 | 93.3% | CA$2.33 Million | CA$2.50 Million | CA$2.76 Million | CA$423.12K | ▼ -74.6 pp |
| 2020 | 167.9% | CA$-236.11K | CA$-140.66K | CA$246.29K | CA$482.40K | ▲ +145.6 pp |
| 2019 | 22.3% | CA$78.19K | CA$350.66K | CA$487.06K | CA$408.88K | ▼ -90.8 pp |
| 2018 | 113.1% | CA$-410.04K | CA$-362.46K | CA$306.15K | CA$716.20K | ▼ -11.7 pp |
| 2017 | 124.8% | CA$-618.83K | CA$-495.75K | CA$111.40K | CA$730.23K | ▲ +276.5 pp |
| 2016 | -151.7% | CA$-223.00K | CA$147.05K | CA$410.28K | CA$633.28K | ▼ -197.9 pp |
| 2015 | 46.2% | CA$344.24K | CA$744.48K | CA$399.92K | CA$55.68K | ▼ -50.4 pp |
| 2014 | 96.6% | CA$1.31 Million | CA$1.36 Million | CA$1.38 Million | CA$64.36K | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2013 | 98.7% | CA$1.19 Million | CA$1.21 Million | CA$1.22 Million | CA$29.43K | ▲ +72.2 pp |
| 2012 | 26.5% | CA$338.05K | CA$1.28 Million | CA$641.10K | CA$303.06K | ▲ +14.3 pp |
| 2011 | 12.2% | CA$311.53K | CA$2.56 Million | CA$641.66K | CA$330.13K | ▼ -17.1 pp |
| 2010 | 29.3% | CA$1.35 Million | CA$4.61 Million | CA$1.65 Million | CA$301.52K | ▼ -70.7 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$176.00K | CA$176.00K | CA$233.56K | CA$57.56K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$270.98K | CA$270.98K | CA$303.79K | CA$32.81K | — |