Roadman Investments Corp (LITT) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Roadman Investments Corp (LITT) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 85.8% as of March 2026. Working capital of CA$1.63 Million (current assets of CA$2.58 Million minus current liabilities of CA$945.34K) is measured against net assets of CA$1.90 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See Roadman Investments Corp defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Roadman Investments Corp Working Capital to Net Assets (2008–2025)
This chart shows how Roadman Investments Corp's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 85.8%, reflecting working capital of CA$1.63 Million against net assets of CA$1.90 Million CAD. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Roadman Investments Corp total assets.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Roadman Investments Corp (2008–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Roadman Investments Corp from 2008 to 2025, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check how resilient are Roadman Investments Corp's assets to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.4% | CA$3.52 Million | CA$3.54 Million | CA$4.31 Million | CA$789.61K | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2024 | 93.6% | CA$4.79 Million | CA$5.12 Million | CA$5.58 Million | CA$790.12K | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2023 | 95.7% | CA$6.59 Million | CA$6.89 Million | CA$7.23 Million | CA$639.70K | ▼ -2893.7 pp |
| 2022 | 2989.4% | CA$-320.73K | CA$-10.73K | CA$508.64K | CA$829.37K | ▲ +2896.1 pp |
| 2021 | 93.3% | CA$2.33 Million | CA$2.50 Million | CA$2.76 Million | CA$423.12K | ▼ -74.6 pp |
| 2020 | 167.9% | CA$-236.11K | CA$-140.66K | CA$246.29K | CA$482.40K | ▲ +145.6 pp |
| 2019 | 22.3% | CA$78.19K | CA$350.66K | CA$487.06K | CA$408.88K | ▼ -90.8 pp |
| 2018 | 113.1% | CA$-410.04K | CA$-362.46K | CA$306.15K | CA$716.20K | ▼ -11.7 pp |
| 2017 | 124.8% | CA$-618.83K | CA$-495.75K | CA$111.40K | CA$730.23K | ▲ +276.5 pp |
| 2016 | -151.7% | CA$-223.00K | CA$147.05K | CA$410.28K | CA$633.28K | ▼ -197.9 pp |
| 2015 | 46.2% | CA$344.24K | CA$744.48K | CA$399.92K | CA$55.68K | ▼ -50.4 pp |
| 2014 | 96.6% | CA$1.31 Million | CA$1.36 Million | CA$1.38 Million | CA$64.36K | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2013 | 98.7% | CA$1.19 Million | CA$1.21 Million | CA$1.22 Million | CA$29.43K | ▲ +72.2 pp |
| 2012 | 26.5% | CA$338.05K | CA$1.28 Million | CA$641.10K | CA$303.06K | ▲ +14.3 pp |
| 2011 | 12.2% | CA$311.53K | CA$2.56 Million | CA$641.66K | CA$330.13K | ▼ -17.1 pp |
| 2010 | 29.3% | CA$1.35 Million | CA$4.61 Million | CA$1.65 Million | CA$301.52K | ▼ -70.7 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$176.00K | CA$176.00K | CA$233.56K | CA$57.56K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$270.98K | CA$270.98K | CA$303.79K | CA$32.81K | — |