Lucky Minerals Inc (LKY) — Net Asset Quality Index
Lucky Minerals Inc (LKY) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -22440.3% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$36.55K minus total liabilities of CA$8.24 Million yields net assets of CA$-8.20 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read debt load of Lucky Minerals Inc for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Lucky Minerals Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2008–2025)
This chart shows how Lucky Minerals Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at -22440.3%, representing net assets of CA$-8.20 Million against total assets of CA$36.55K CAD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Lucky Minerals Inc stock valuation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Lucky Minerals Inc (2008–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Lucky Minerals Inc from 2008 to 2025, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check LKY capital-intensive asset ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -23631.9% | CA$-8.01 Million | CA$33.88K | CA$8.04 Million | ▼ -23374.9 pp |
| 2023 | -257.0% | CA$-2.75 Million | CA$1.07 Million | CA$3.82 Million | ▼ -338.0 pp |
| 2022 | 81.1% | CA$6.43 Million | CA$7.93 Million | CA$1.50 Million | ▲ +3.8 pp |
| 2021 | 77.3% | CA$6.36 Million | CA$8.23 Million | CA$1.87 Million | ▲ +7.7 pp |
| 2020 | 69.5% | CA$3.70 Million | CA$5.33 Million | CA$1.62 Million | ▲ +35.8 pp |
| 2019 | 33.8% | CA$1.94 Million | CA$5.75 Million | CA$3.81 Million | ▲ +17.0 pp |
| 2018 | 16.7% | CA$399.74K | CA$2.39 Million | CA$1.99 Million | ▼ -66.3 pp |
| 2017 | 83.0% | CA$636.80K | CA$766.97K | CA$130.17K | ▼ -14.9 pp |
| 2016 | 97.9% | CA$577.66K | CA$589.97K | CA$12.30K | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2015 | 97.4% | CA$769.64K | CA$789.79K | CA$20.16K | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2014 | 97.4% | CA$968.01K | CA$994.01K | CA$26.00K | ▲ +9.3 pp |
| 2013 | 88.1% | CA$413.27K | CA$469.17K | CA$55.90K | ▲ +18.0 pp |
| 2012 | 70.1% | CA$100.05K | CA$142.71K | CA$42.65K | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2011 | 71.3% | CA$156.20K | CA$219.06K | CA$62.86K | ▼ -20.0 pp |
| 2010 | 91.3% | CA$468.06K | CA$512.76K | CA$44.70K | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2009 | 92.1% | CA$395.56K | CA$429.56K | CA$34.00K | ▲ +252.1 pp |
| 2008 | -160.0% | CA$-11.73K | CA$7.33K | CA$19.06K | — |