Lucky Minerals Inc (LKY) — Net Asset Quality Index
Lucky Minerals Inc (LKY) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -23248.8% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$35.09K minus total liabilities of CA$8.19 Million yields net assets of CA$-8.16 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See LKY cash and liquid assets coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Lucky Minerals Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2008–2025)
This chart shows how Lucky Minerals Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at -23248.8%, representing net assets of CA$-8.16 Million against total assets of CA$35.09K CAD. Explore LKY cash generation efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Lucky Minerals Inc (2008–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Lucky Minerals Inc from 2008 to 2025, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see LKY market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -23631.9% | CA$-8.01 Million | CA$33.88K | CA$8.04 Million | ▼ -23374.9 pp |
| 2023 | -257.0% | CA$-2.75 Million | CA$1.07 Million | CA$3.82 Million | ▼ -338.0 pp |
| 2022 | 81.1% | CA$6.43 Million | CA$7.93 Million | CA$1.50 Million | ▲ +3.8 pp |
| 2021 | 77.3% | CA$6.36 Million | CA$8.23 Million | CA$1.87 Million | ▲ +7.7 pp |
| 2020 | 69.5% | CA$3.70 Million | CA$5.33 Million | CA$1.62 Million | ▲ +35.8 pp |
| 2019 | 33.8% | CA$1.94 Million | CA$5.75 Million | CA$3.81 Million | ▲ +17.0 pp |
| 2018 | 16.7% | CA$399.74K | CA$2.39 Million | CA$1.99 Million | ▼ -66.3 pp |
| 2017 | 83.0% | CA$636.80K | CA$766.97K | CA$130.17K | ▼ -14.9 pp |
| 2016 | 97.9% | CA$577.66K | CA$589.97K | CA$12.30K | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2015 | 97.4% | CA$769.64K | CA$789.79K | CA$20.16K | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2014 | 97.4% | CA$968.01K | CA$994.01K | CA$26.00K | ▲ +9.3 pp |
| 2013 | 88.1% | CA$413.27K | CA$469.17K | CA$55.90K | ▲ +18.0 pp |
| 2012 | 70.1% | CA$100.05K | CA$142.71K | CA$42.65K | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2011 | 71.3% | CA$156.20K | CA$219.06K | CA$62.86K | ▼ -20.0 pp |
| 2010 | 91.3% | CA$468.06K | CA$512.76K | CA$44.70K | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2009 | 92.1% | CA$395.56K | CA$429.56K | CA$34.00K | ▲ +252.1 pp |
| 2008 | -160.0% | CA$-11.73K | CA$7.33K | CA$19.06K | — |