Lucky Minerals Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Lucky Minerals Inc working capital to net assets ratio. Lucky Minerals Inc (LKY) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 100.0% as of March 2026. Working capital of CA$-8.20 Million (current assets of CA$36.55K minus current liabilities of CA$8.24 Million) is measured against net assets of CA$-8.20 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check Lucky Minerals Inc tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Lucky Minerals Inc (2008–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Lucky Minerals Inc from 2008 to 2025. This chart shows how Lucky Minerals Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting working capital of CA$-8.20 Million against net assets of CA$-8.20 Million CAD. See operational self-sufficiency of Lucky Minerals Inc to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Lucky Minerals Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2008–2025)
Lucky Minerals Inc working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2008 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Lucky Minerals Inc from 2008 to 2025, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Lucky Minerals Inc assets under control.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | CA$-8.01 Million | CA$-8.01 Million | CA$33.88K | CA$8.04 Million | ▼ -36.5 pp |
| 2023 | 136.5% | CA$-3.76 Million | CA$-2.75 Million | CA$66.85K | CA$3.82 Million | ▲ +139.1 pp |
| 2022 | -2.6% | CA$-169.82K | CA$6.43 Million | CA$1.32 Million | CA$1.49 Million | ▼ -36.9 pp |
| 2021 | 34.3% | CA$2.18 Million | CA$6.36 Million | CA$2.58 Million | CA$395.43K | ▲ +67.7 pp |
| 2020 | -33.4% | CA$-1.24 Million | CA$3.70 Million | CA$386.67K | CA$1.62 Million | ▲ +104.3 pp |
| 2019 | -137.7% | CA$-2.67 Million | CA$1.94 Million | CA$191.82K | CA$2.87 Million | ▲ +43.7 pp |
| 2018 | -181.4% | CA$-724.98K | CA$399.74K | CA$1.26 Million | CA$1.99 Million | ▼ -176.5 pp |
| 2017 | -4.8% | CA$-30.78K | CA$636.80K | CA$99.39K | CA$130.17K | ▼ -8.5 pp |
| 2016 | 3.7% | CA$21.09K | CA$577.66K | CA$33.39K | CA$12.30K | ▼ -34.6 pp |
| 2015 | 38.2% | CA$294.37K | CA$769.64K | CA$314.53K | CA$20.16K | ▼ -45.7 pp |
| 2014 | 83.9% | CA$812.47K | CA$968.01K | CA$838.47K | CA$26.00K | ▲ +36.4 pp |
| 2013 | 47.5% | CA$196.29K | CA$413.27K | CA$252.19K | CA$55.90K | ▲ +12.9 pp |
| 2012 | 34.6% | CA$34.64K | CA$100.05K | CA$77.29K | CA$42.65K | ▲ +25.3 pp |
| 2011 | 9.4% | CA$14.62K | CA$156.20K | CA$57.34K | CA$42.71K | ▼ -27.9 pp |
| 2010 | 37.3% | CA$174.59K | CA$468.06K | CA$199.15K | CA$24.56K | ▼ -10.0 pp |
| 2009 | 47.3% | CA$186.94K | CA$395.56K | CA$220.94K | CA$34.00K | ▼ -52.7 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$-11.73K | CA$-11.73K | CA$7.33K | CA$19.06K | — |