Elektrotim SA (ELT) — Net Asset Quality Index
Elektrotim SA (ELT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 43.5% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of zł283.73 Million minus total liabilities of zł160.44 Million yields net assets of zł123.29 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Elektrotim SA asset resilience ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Elektrotim SA Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2008–2024)
This chart shows how Elektrotim SA's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2008 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 43.5%, representing net assets of zł123.29 Million against total assets of zł283.73 Million PLN. See ELT current assets to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Elektrotim SA (2008–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Elektrotim SA from 2008 to 2024, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see ELT market cap overview.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (PLN) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 51.0% | zł134.37 Million | zł263.67 Million | zł129.30 Million | ▲ +12.6 pp |
| 2023 | 38.4% | zł103.17 Million | zł268.60 Million | zł165.43 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2022 | 36.9% | zł99.12 Million | zł268.33 Million | zł169.21 Million | ▼ -6.2 pp |
| 2021 | 43.1% | zł77.94 Million | zł180.82 Million | zł102.88 Million | ▲ +4.1 pp |
| 2020 | 39.0% | zł71.25 Million | zł182.53 Million | zł111.28 Million | ▲ +4.4 pp |
| 2019 | 34.6% | zł54.43 Million | zł157.12 Million | zł102.69 Million | ▼ -5.4 pp |
| 2018 | 40.0% | zł71.45 Million | zł178.60 Million | zł107.14 Million | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2017 | 43.5% | zł76.45 Million | zł175.94 Million | zł99.49 Million | ▼ -7.4 pp |
| 2016 | 50.9% | zł84.51 Million | zł166.15 Million | zł81.64 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2015 | 49.1% | zł98.38 Million | zł200.24 Million | zł101.87 Million | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2014 | 51.7% | zł81.93 Million | zł158.37 Million | zł76.44 Million | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2013 | 59.7% | zł89.03 Million | zł149.08 Million | zł60.05 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2012 | 59.5% | zł87.35 Million | zł146.72 Million | zł59.37 Million | ▼ -5.0 pp |
| 2011 | 64.5% | zł89.94 Million | zł139.43 Million | zł49.48 Million | ▼ -6.5 pp |
| 2010 | 71.0% | zł86.59 Million | zł121.90 Million | zł35.32 Million | ▼ -7.2 pp |
| 2009 | 78.3% | zł94.17 Million | zł120.34 Million | zł26.17 Million | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 2008 | 72.6% | zł90.17 Million | zł124.23 Million | zł34.06 Million | — |