Enea S.A. (ENA) — Net Asset Quality Index
Enea S.A. (ENA) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 49.7% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of zł37.57 Billion minus total liabilities of zł18.90 Billion yields net assets of zł18.67 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See ENA defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Enea S.A. Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2007–2025)
This chart shows how Enea S.A.'s Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2007 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 49.7%, representing net assets of zł18.67 Billion against total assets of zł37.57 Billion PLN. Explore ENA cash flow metrics to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Enea S.A. (2007–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Enea S.A. from 2007 to 2025, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Enea S.A. stock valuation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (PLN) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44.5% | zł17.74 Billion | zł39.89 Billion | zł22.15 Billion | ▲ +3.1 pp |
| 2024 | 41.4% | zł16.33 Billion | zł39.47 Billion | zł23.14 Billion | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2023 | 39.5% | zł15.44 Billion | zł39.11 Billion | zł23.67 Billion | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 2022 | 43.1% | zł16.15 Billion | zł37.43 Billion | zł21.29 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2021 | 43.8% | zł15.18 Billion | zł34.63 Billion | zł19.45 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 43.8% | zł13.09 Billion | zł29.89 Billion | zł16.80 Billion | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2019 | 47.1% | zł15.48 Billion | zł32.84 Billion | zł17.36 Billion | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2018 | 50.2% | zł15.05 Billion | zł29.97 Billion | zł14.92 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2017 | 49.4% | zł14.00 Billion | zł28.31 Billion | zł14.31 Billion | ▼ -3.6 pp |
| 2016 | 53.0% | zł13.01 Billion | zł24.54 Billion | zł11.52 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2015 | 52.7% | zł12.12 Billion | zł22.99 Billion | zł10.87 Billion | ▼ -13.9 pp |
| 2014 | 66.6% | zł12.06 Billion | zł18.11 Billion | zł6.04 Billion | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2013 | 70.4% | zł11.49 Billion | zł16.32 Billion | zł4.83 Billion | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2012 | 74.4% | zł10.94 Billion | zł14.71 Billion | zł3.77 Billion | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2011 | 76.5% | zł10.48 Billion | zł13.70 Billion | zł3.22 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2010 | 76.9% | zł9.88 Billion | zł12.84 Billion | zł2.96 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2009 | 76.6% | zł9.37 Billion | zł12.23 Billion | zł2.86 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2008 | 75.3% | zł9.02 Billion | zł11.99 Billion | zł2.96 Billion | ▲ +6.4 pp |
| 2007 | 68.9% | zł6.77 Billion | zł9.82 Billion | zł3.05 Billion | — |