Central Garden & Pet Company A (CENTA) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Central Garden & Pet Company A (CENTA) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 41.6% as of March 2023. Strategic assets (PP&E of $570.22 Million plus long-term investments of $-) total $570.22 Million, measured against net assets of $1.37 Billion. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. Check CENTA asset resilience ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Central Garden & Pet Company A Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2022)
This chart shows how Central Garden & Pet Company A's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 23 annual periods from 2000 to 2022. As of March 2023, the index stands at 41.6%, representing strategic assets of $570.22 Million against net assets of $1.37 Billion USD. See CENTA FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Central Garden & Pet Company A (2000–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Central Garden & Pet Company A from 2000 to 2022, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see CENTA market cap.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 43.7% | $583.32 Million | $583.32 Million | $- | $1.33 Billion | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2021 | 40.4% | $494.17 Million | $494.17 Million | $- | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +17.7 pp |
| 2020 | 22.7% | $244.67 Million | $244.67 Million | $- | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2019 | 25.8% | $257.50 Million | $245.41 Million | $12.10 Million | $996.18 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2018 | 24.8% | $236.15 Million | $217.65 Million | $18.50 Million | $952.83 Million | ▼ -5.1 pp |
| 2017 | 29.8% | $190.11 Million | $180.91 Million | $9.20 Million | $637.14 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2016 | 28.6% | $158.72 Million | $158.22 Million | $500.00K | $554.59 Million | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 2015 | 32.2% | $162.81 Million | $162.81 Million | $- | $506.38 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2014 | 34.3% | $166.85 Million | $166.85 Million | $- | $486.45 Million | ▼ -5.9 pp |
| 2013 | 40.2% | $188.91 Million | $188.91 Million | $- | $470.02 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2012 | 41.1% | $191.16 Million | $191.16 Million | $- | $464.88 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2011 | 38.6% | $176.40 Million | $176.40 Million | $- | $456.78 Million | ▲ +7.6 pp |
| 2010 | 31.1% | $165.28 Million | $165.28 Million | $- | $532.14 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2009 | 30.1% | $164.73 Million | $164.73 Million | $- | $547.34 Million | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2008 | 34.0% | $174.01 Million | $174.01 Million | $- | $511.43 Million | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 2007 | 25.9% | $201.61 Million | $201.61 Million | $- | $778.81 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2006 | 22.3% | $162.60 Million | $162.60 Million | $- | $728.53 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2005 | 20.2% | $110.59 Million | $110.59 Million | $- | $547.18 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2004 | 22.2% | $105.61 Million | $105.61 Million | $- | $476.80 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2003 | 23.9% | $101.54 Million | $101.54 Million | $- | $425.10 Million | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2002 | 26.7% | $100.86 Million | $100.86 Million | $- | $377.51 Million | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2001 | 23.9% | $108.80 Million | $108.80 Million | $- | $455.31 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2000 | 24.1% | $111.74 Million | $111.74 Million | $- | $463.95 Million | — |