Central Garden & Pet Company A Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Central Garden & Pet Company A working capital to net assets ratio. Central Garden & Pet Company A (CENTA) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 89.7% as of March 2026. Working capital of $1.48 Billion (current assets of $2.09 Billion minus current liabilities of $605.16 Million) is measured against net assets of $1.65 Billion. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check how tangible is Central Garden & Pet Company A's equity to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Central Garden & Pet Company A (1992–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Central Garden & Pet Company A from 1992 to 2025. This chart shows how Central Garden & Pet Company A's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 34 annual periods from 1992 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 89.7%, reflecting working capital of $1.48 Billion against net assets of $1.65 Billion USD. See how many days can Central Garden & Pet Company A fund operations to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Central Garden & Pet Company A Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
Central Garden & Pet Company A working capital to net assets ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Central Garden & Pet Company A from 1992 to 2025, covering 34 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Central Garden & Pet Company A assets under control.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 90.7% | $1.44 Billion | $1.58 Billion | $1.98 Billion | $538.76 Million | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2024 | 88.1% | $1.37 Billion | $1.56 Billion | $1.89 Billion | $515.38 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2023 | 86.0% | $1.25 Billion | $1.45 Billion | $1.71 Billion | $457.99 Million | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2022 | 81.5% | $1.09 Billion | $1.33 Billion | $1.55 Billion | $465.89 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2021 | 83.5% | $1.02 Billion | $1.22 Billion | $1.54 Billion | $522.32 Million | ▼ -17.2 pp |
| 2020 | 100.7% | $1.09 Billion | $1.08 Billion | $1.53 Billion | $440.26 Million | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2019 | 103.3% | $1.03 Billion | $996.18 Million | $1.31 Billion | $278.52 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2018 | 105.4% | $1.00 Billion | $952.83 Million | $1.22 Billion | $212.96 Million | ▲ +32.8 pp |
| 2017 | 72.6% | $462.85 Million | $637.14 Million | $683.06 Million | $220.21 Million | ▼ -19.8 pp |
| 2016 | 92.4% | $512.59 Million | $554.59 Million | $714.81 Million | $202.22 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2015 | 94.2% | $476.92 Million | $506.38 Million | $653.82 Million | $176.90 Million | ▼ -8.3 pp |
| 2014 | 102.5% | $498.45 Million | $486.45 Million | $671.55 Million | $173.10 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2013 | 104.3% | $490.32 Million | $470.02 Million | $672.65 Million | $182.33 Million | ▲ +8.5 pp |
| 2012 | 95.8% | $445.30 Million | $464.88 Million | $651.78 Million | $206.48 Million | ▲ +5.9 pp |
| 2011 | 89.9% | $410.65 Million | $456.78 Million | $602.59 Million | $191.93 Million | ▲ +8.4 pp |
| 2010 | 81.5% | $433.70 Million | $532.14 Million | $627.90 Million | $194.19 Million | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2009 | 78.1% | $427.24 Million | $547.34 Million | $621.49 Million | $194.25 Million | ▼ -10.1 pp |
| 2008 | 88.1% | $450.70 Million | $511.43 Million | $671.75 Million | $221.05 Million | ▲ +27.8 pp |
| 2007 | 60.4% | $470.22 Million | $778.81 Million | $685.51 Million | $215.29 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2006 | 58.7% | $427.40 Million | $728.53 Million | $634.70 Million | $207.30 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2005 | 62.8% | $343.46 Million | $547.18 Million | $510.28 Million | $166.82 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2004 | 61.4% | $292.95 Million | $476.80 Million | $464.86 Million | $171.91 Million | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2003 | 71.2% | $302.87 Million | $425.10 Million | $456.06 Million | $153.19 Million | ▲ +30.4 pp |
| 2002 | 40.8% | $154.02 Million | $377.51 Million | $361.12 Million | $207.11 Million | ▲ +16.4 pp |
| 2001 | 24.4% | $110.99 Million | $455.31 Million | $403.76 Million | $292.77 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2000 | 26.1% | $121.13 Million | $463.95 Million | $420.15 Million | $299.02 Million | ▼ -8.1 pp |
| 1999 | 34.2% | $169.70 Million | $495.70 Million | $484.80 Million | $315.10 Million | ▼ -12.9 pp |
| 1998 | 47.2% | $277.70 Million | $588.80 Million | $472.30 Million | $194.60 Million | ▼ -42.9 pp |
| 1997 | 90.1% | $253.90 Million | $281.80 Million | $414.40 Million | $160.50 Million | ▲ +16.3 pp |
| 1996 | 73.8% | $95.70 Million | $129.60 Million | $240.50 Million | $144.80 Million | ▲ +8.0 pp |
| 1995 | 65.9% | $25.30 Million | $38.40 Million | $116.60 Million | $91.30 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 1994 | 64.7% | $25.70 Million | $39.70 Million | $118.50 Million | $92.80 Million | ▼ -10.3 pp |
| 1993 | 75.1% | $26.80 Million | $35.70 Million | $124.00 Million | $97.20 Million | ▲ +13.6 pp |
| 1992 | 61.5% | $9.90 Million | $16.10 Million | $108.30 Million | $98.40 Million | — |