Stefstock Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Stefstock tangible net worth ratio. Stefstock (SSK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of August 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (ZAC0.00) from net assets (ZAC69.42 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check Stefstock (SSK) strategic asset index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Stefstock (2007–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Stefstock from 2007 to 2025. This chart shows how Stefstock's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 16 annual periods from 2007 to 2025. As of August 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of ZAC69.42 Million with intangible assets of ZAC0.00 ZAC. See Stefstock current assets vs equity to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Stefstock Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2007–2025)
Stefstock tangible net worth ratio by year from 2007 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Stefstock from 2007 to 2025, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Stefstock.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (ZAC) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | ZAC16.31 Million | ZAC0.00 | ZAC5.09 Billion | ▲ +98.0 pp |
| 2021 | 2.0% | ZAC352.57 Million | ZAC345.66 Million | ZAC5.41 Billion | ▼ -97.9 pp |
| 2020 | 99.8% | ZAC711.67 Million | ZAC1.34 Million | ZAC6.65 Billion | ▲ +26.2 pp |
| 2019 | 73.6% | ZAC1.73 Billion | ZAC457.58 Million | ZAC6.45 Billion | ▼ -26.3 pp |
| 2018 | 99.8% | ZAC1.88 Billion | ZAC2.92 Million | ZAC6.42 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2017 | 99.5% | ZAC2.44 Billion | ZAC11.34 Million | ZAC6.57 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2016 | 99.2% | ZAC2.61 Billion | ZAC20.29 Million | ZAC6.51 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2015 | 98.8% | ZAC2.40 Billion | ZAC28.21 Million | ZAC6.52 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2014 | 98.4% | ZAC2.20 Billion | ZAC36.13 Million | ZAC6.30 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2013 | 97.8% | ZAC2.00 Billion | ZAC44.44 Million | ZAC6.20 Billion | ▲ +101.0 pp |
| 2012 | -3.2% | ZAC2.11 Billion | ZAC2.18 Billion | ZAC5.91 Billion | ▼ -42.2 pp |
| 2011 | 38.9% | ZAC1.85 Billion | ZAC1.13 Billion | ZAC5.07 Billion | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2010 | 33.1% | ZAC1.68 Billion | ZAC1.13 Billion | ZAC5.03 Billion | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 2009 | 28.0% | ZAC1.61 Billion | ZAC1.16 Billion | ZAC5.02 Billion | ▼ -46.7 pp |
| 2008 | 74.7% | ZAC615.77 Million | ZAC155.95 Million | ZAC1.83 Billion | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2007 | 72.6% | ZAC215.68 Million | ZAC59.09 Million | ZAC786.46 Million | — |