Bridgeline Digital Inc (BLIN) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Bridgeline Digital Inc (BLIN) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 68.7% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($2.99 Million) from net assets ($9.55 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore BLIN net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Bridgeline Digital Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2004–2025)
This chart shows how Bridgeline Digital Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 22 annual periods from 2004 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 68.7%, reflecting net assets of $9.55 Million with intangible assets of $2.99 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market cap of Bridgeline Digital Inc.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Bridgeline Digital Inc (2004–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Bridgeline Digital Inc from 2004 to 2025, covering 22 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore BLIN capex reinvestment rate to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 66.8% | $9.57 Million | $3.18 Million | $15.33 Million | ▲ +5.9 pp |
| 2024 | 60.9% | $10.01 Million | $3.91 Million | $15.60 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2023 | 57.3% | $11.46 Million | $4.89 Million | $17.63 Million | ▼ -11.9 pp |
| 2022 | 69.2% | $20.35 Million | $6.27 Million | $27.51 Million | ▲ +13.3 pp |
| 2021 | 55.9% | $17.58 Million | $7.75 Million | $34.97 Million | ▲ +16.0 pp |
| 2020 | 39.9% | $4.36 Million | $2.62 Million | $10.66 Million | ▲ +32.4 pp |
| 2019 | 7.6% | $3.80 Million | $3.51 Million | $11.15 Million | ▼ -92.0 pp |
| 2018 | 99.5% | $4.42 Million | $20.00K | $11.00 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2017 | 97.7% | $11.27 Million | $263.00K | $17.57 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2016 | 95.2% | $11.50 Million | $548.00K | $17.73 Million | ▲ +13.4 pp |
| 2015 | 81.9% | $5.67 Million | $1.03 Million | $19.19 Million | ▼ -10.2 pp |
| 2014 | 92.1% | $19.93 Million | $1.58 Million | $33.56 Million | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2013 | 93.3% | $22.75 Million | $1.52 Million | $36.98 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 93.4% | $22.97 Million | $1.53 Million | $33.69 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2011 | 92.8% | $21.21 Million | $1.53 Million | $31.41 Million | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2010 | 88.9% | $20.66 Million | $2.29 Million | $31.72 Million | ▼ -3.6 pp |
| 2009 | 92.5% | $19.90 Million | $1.49 Million | $24.25 Million | ▲ +8.9 pp |
| 2008 | 83.6% | $18.19 Million | $2.98 Million | $24.26 Million | ▼ -10.1 pp |
| 2007 | 93.7% | $22.88 Million | $1.44 Million | $25.76 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2006 | 94.6% | $5.63 Million | $303.00K | $9.82 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2005 | 94.1% | $5.59 Million | $331.00K | $6.74 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2004 | 98.1% | $3.87 Million | $72.00K | $4.96 Million | — |