Calumet Specialty Products Partners Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Calumet Specialty Products Partners tangible net worth ratio. Calumet Specialty Products Partners (CLMT) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -494.5% as of June 2020. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($64.80 Million) from net assets ($10.90 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check Calumet Specialty Products Partners strategic asset allocation index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Calumet Specialty Products Partners (2004–2019)
Tangible net worth ratio of Calumet Specialty Products Partners from 2004 to 2019. This chart shows how Calumet Specialty Products Partners's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 16 annual periods from 2004 to 2019. As of June 2020, the ratio stands at -494.5%, reflecting net assets of $10.90 Million with intangible assets of $64.80 Million USD. See Calumet Specialty Products Partners short-term liquidity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Calumet Specialty Products Partners Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2004–2019)
Calumet Specialty Products Partners tangible net worth ratio by year from 2004 to 2019. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Calumet Specialty Products Partners from 2004 to 2019, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Calumet Specialty Products Partners (CLMT) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | -319.4% | $21.60 Million | $90.60 Million | $1.86 Billion | ▼ -285.5 pp |
| 2018 | -33.9% | $65.70 Million | $88.00 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▼ -44.0 pp |
| 2017 | 10.0% | $119.90 Million | $107.90 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▼ -8.4 pp |
| 2016 | 18.4% | $218.70 Million | $178.50 Million | $2.73 Billion | ▼ -46.2 pp |
| 2015 | 64.5% | $603.90 Million | $214.10 Million | $2.94 Billion | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 2014 | 68.2% | $810.20 Million | $257.50 Million | $3.12 Billion | ▼ -11.8 pp |
| 2013 | 80.0% | $1.06 Billion | $212.90 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2012 | 77.9% | $889.79 Million | $197.08 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▼ -19.0 pp |
| 2011 | 96.9% | $728.90 Million | $22.68 Million | $1.73 Billion | ▲ +4.3 pp |
| 2010 | 92.6% | $398.28 Million | $29.67 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2009 | 92.2% | $485.35 Million | $38.09 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2008 | 89.5% | $473.21 Million | $49.50 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2007 | 99.4% | $399.64 Million | $2.46 Million | $678.86 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2006 | 99.9% | $378.69 Million | $566.00K | $530.17 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2005 | 97.4% | $39.05 Million | $1.02 Million | $399.72 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2004 | 95.7% | $34.51 Million | $1.48 Million | $318.21 Million | — |