Curis Inc (CRIS) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Curis Inc (CRIS) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($12.71 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Curis Inc (CRIS) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Curis Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1999–2025)
This chart shows how Curis Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 24 annual periods from 1999 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $12.71 Million with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Curis Inc market cap and net worth.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Curis Inc (1999–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Curis Inc from 1999 to 2025, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore reinvestment intensity of Curis Inc to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | $5.46 Million | $0.00 | $19.97 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $19.67 Million | $0.00 | $77.28 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | $46.55 Million | $0.00 | $108.85 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | $90.71 Million | $0.00 | $162.30 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | $130.67 Million | $0.00 | $204.36 Million | ▲ +37.4 pp |
| 2017 | 62.6% | $23.99 Million | $8.98 Million | $73.80 Million | ▼ -6.7 pp |
| 2016 | 69.3% | $29.27 Million | $8.98 Million | $57.75 Million | ▼ -16.8 pp |
| 2015 | 86.1% | $64.51 Million | $8.98 Million | $94.97 Million | ▲ +16.2 pp |
| 2014 | 69.8% | $29.78 Million | $8.98 Million | $62.61 Million | ▼ -10.3 pp |
| 2013 | 80.1% | $45.17 Million | $8.98 Million | $80.59 Million | ▲ +6.3 pp |
| 2012 | 73.8% | $34.27 Million | $8.98 Million | $69.98 Million | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 2011 | 77.5% | $39.88 Million | $8.98 Million | $48.18 Million | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2010 | 80.3% | $45.52 Million | $8.98 Million | $50.65 Million | ▲ +7.4 pp |
| 2009 | 72.8% | $33.05 Million | $8.98 Million | $36.10 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2008 | 75.9% | $37.22 Million | $8.98 Million | $39.98 Million | ▼ -5.0 pp |
| 2007 | 80.8% | $46.84 Million | $8.98 Million | $53.82 Million | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2006 | 75.0% | $35.90 Million | $8.98 Million | $52.27 Million | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2005 | 76.3% | $38.00 Million | $9.01 Million | $60.91 Million | ▼ -23.5 pp |
| 2004 | 99.8% | $48.91 Million | $102.12K | $67.63 Million | ▲ +23.4 pp |
| 2003 | 76.4% | $38.87 Million | $9.16 Million | $55.74 Million | ▲ +26.2 pp |
| 2002 | 50.2% | $18.54 Million | $9.23 Million | $62.44 Million | ▲ +23.3 pp |
| 2001 | 26.9% | $101.02 Million | $73.81 Million | $144.76 Million | ▼ -15.5 pp |
| 2000 | 42.5% | $168.81 Million | $97.15 Million | $182.68 Million | ▼ -57.3 pp |
| 1999 | 99.7% | $23.42 Million | $60.30K | $28.89 Million | — |