Fiserv Inc. (FISV) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Fiserv Inc. (FISV) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 85.3% as of December 2024. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($4.07 Billion) from net assets ($27.69 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See FISV working capital efficiency to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Fiserv Inc. Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1994–2023)
This chart shows how Fiserv Inc.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 30 annual periods from 1994 to 2023. As of December 2024, the ratio stands at 85.3%, reflecting net assets of $27.69 Billion with intangible assets of $4.07 Billion USD. See operational self-sufficiency of Fiserv Inc. to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Fiserv Inc. (1994–2023)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Fiserv Inc. from 1994 to 2023, covering 30 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market cap of Fiserv Inc..
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 63.4% | $30.67 Billion | $11.21 Billion | $90.89 Billion | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2022 | 60.8% | $31.69 Billion | $12.41 Billion | $83.87 Billion | ▲ +4.7 pp |
| 2021 | 56.2% | $31.95 Billion | $14.01 Billion | $76.25 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2020 | 53.9% | $33.33 Billion | $15.36 Billion | $74.62 Billion | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2019 | 49.4% | $34.86 Billion | $17.64 Billion | $77.54 Billion | ▲ +42.8 pp |
| 2018 | 6.5% | $2.29 Billion | $2.14 Billion | $11.26 Billion | ▼ -24.5 pp |
| 2017 | 31.1% | $2.73 Billion | $1.88 Billion | $10.29 Billion | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2016 | 27.9% | $2.54 Billion | $1.83 Billion | $9.74 Billion | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2015 | 29.6% | $2.66 Billion | $1.87 Billion | $9.34 Billion | ▼ -9.6 pp |
| 2014 | 39.2% | $3.29 Billion | $2.00 Billion | $9.34 Billion | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2013 | 40.3% | $3.58 Billion | $2.14 Billion | $9.51 Billion | ▼ -8.2 pp |
| 2012 | 48.5% | $3.42 Billion | $1.76 Billion | $8.50 Billion | ▲ +6.2 pp |
| 2011 | 42.3% | $3.26 Billion | $1.88 Billion | $8.55 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2010 | 41.8% | $3.23 Billion | $1.88 Billion | $8.28 Billion | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 2009 | 33.7% | $3.03 Billion | $2.01 Billion | $8.38 Billion | ▲ +15.5 pp |
| 2008 | 18.2% | $2.59 Billion | $2.12 Billion | $9.33 Billion | ▲ +12.4 pp |
| 2007 | 5.8% | $2.47 Billion | $2.32 Billion | $11.85 Billion | ▼ -68.9 pp |
| 2006 | 74.7% | $2.43 Billion | $614.82 Million | $6.21 Billion | ▲ +90.0 pp |
| 2005 | -15.3% | $2.47 Billion | $2.84 Billion | $6.04 Billion | ▼ -22.6 pp |
| 2004 | 7.2% | $2.56 Billion | $2.38 Billion | $8.38 Billion | ▲ +17.4 pp |
| 2003 | -10.1% | $2.20 Billion | $2.42 Billion | $7.21 Billion | ▼ -18.6 pp |
| 2002 | 8.5% | $1.83 Billion | $1.67 Billion | $6.44 Billion | ▼ -22.4 pp |
| 2001 | 30.8% | $1.60 Billion | $1.11 Billion | $5.32 Billion | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2000 | 32.4% | $1.25 Billion | $846.74 Million | $5.59 Billion | ▲ +5.9 pp |
| 1999 | 26.5% | $1.09 Billion | $802.07 Million | $5.31 Billion | ▼ -6.3 pp |
| 1998 | 32.8% | $885.80 Million | $595.20 Million | $3.96 Billion | ▼ -14.5 pp |
| 1997 | 47.3% | $769.30 Million | $405.70 Million | $3.64 Billion | ▲ +14.7 pp |
| 1996 | 32.5% | $507.30 Million | $342.20 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▲ +15.0 pp |
| 1995 | 17.6% | $434.30 Million | $357.90 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▼ -40.3 pp |
| 1994 | 57.9% | $350.80 Million | $147.70 Million | $1.42 Billion | — |