Fiserv Inc. (FISV) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Fiserv Inc. (FISV) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 85.3% as of December 2024. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($4.07 Billion) from net assets ($27.69 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore FISV net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Fiserv Inc. Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1994–2023)
This chart shows how Fiserv Inc.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 30 annual periods from 1994 to 2023. As of December 2024, the ratio stands at 85.3%, reflecting net assets of $27.69 Billion with intangible assets of $4.07 Billion USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Fiserv Inc. worth.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Fiserv Inc. (1994–2023)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Fiserv Inc. from 1994 to 2023, covering 30 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore Fiserv Inc. (FISV) reinvestment ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 63.4% | $30.67 Billion | $11.21 Billion | $90.89 Billion | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2022 | 60.8% | $31.69 Billion | $12.41 Billion | $83.87 Billion | ▲ +4.7 pp |
| 2021 | 56.2% | $31.95 Billion | $14.01 Billion | $76.25 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2020 | 53.9% | $33.33 Billion | $15.36 Billion | $74.62 Billion | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2019 | 49.4% | $34.86 Billion | $17.64 Billion | $77.54 Billion | ▲ +42.8 pp |
| 2018 | 6.5% | $2.29 Billion | $2.14 Billion | $11.26 Billion | ▼ -24.5 pp |
| 2017 | 31.1% | $2.73 Billion | $1.88 Billion | $10.29 Billion | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2016 | 27.9% | $2.54 Billion | $1.83 Billion | $9.74 Billion | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2015 | 29.6% | $2.66 Billion | $1.87 Billion | $9.34 Billion | ▼ -9.6 pp |
| 2014 | 39.2% | $3.29 Billion | $2.00 Billion | $9.34 Billion | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2013 | 40.3% | $3.58 Billion | $2.14 Billion | $9.51 Billion | ▼ -8.2 pp |
| 2012 | 48.5% | $3.42 Billion | $1.76 Billion | $8.50 Billion | ▲ +6.2 pp |
| 2011 | 42.3% | $3.26 Billion | $1.88 Billion | $8.55 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2010 | 41.8% | $3.23 Billion | $1.88 Billion | $8.28 Billion | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 2009 | 33.7% | $3.03 Billion | $2.01 Billion | $8.38 Billion | ▲ +15.5 pp |
| 2008 | 18.2% | $2.59 Billion | $2.12 Billion | $9.33 Billion | ▲ +12.4 pp |
| 2007 | 5.8% | $2.47 Billion | $2.32 Billion | $11.85 Billion | ▼ -68.9 pp |
| 2006 | 74.7% | $2.43 Billion | $614.82 Million | $6.21 Billion | ▲ +90.0 pp |
| 2005 | -15.3% | $2.47 Billion | $2.84 Billion | $6.04 Billion | ▼ -22.6 pp |
| 2004 | 7.2% | $2.56 Billion | $2.38 Billion | $8.38 Billion | ▲ +17.4 pp |
| 2003 | -10.1% | $2.20 Billion | $2.42 Billion | $7.21 Billion | ▼ -18.6 pp |
| 2002 | 8.5% | $1.83 Billion | $1.67 Billion | $6.44 Billion | ▼ -22.4 pp |
| 2001 | 30.8% | $1.60 Billion | $1.11 Billion | $5.32 Billion | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2000 | 32.4% | $1.25 Billion | $846.74 Million | $5.59 Billion | ▲ +5.9 pp |
| 1999 | 26.5% | $1.09 Billion | $802.07 Million | $5.31 Billion | ▼ -6.3 pp |
| 1998 | 32.8% | $885.80 Million | $595.20 Million | $3.96 Billion | ▼ -14.5 pp |
| 1997 | 47.3% | $769.30 Million | $405.70 Million | $3.64 Billion | ▲ +14.7 pp |
| 1996 | 32.5% | $507.30 Million | $342.20 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▲ +15.0 pp |
| 1995 | 17.6% | $434.30 Million | $357.90 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▼ -40.3 pp |
| 1994 | 57.9% | $350.80 Million | $147.70 Million | $1.42 Billion | — |